Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 114 (8796 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 10-23-2017 5:59 AM
341 online now:
PaulK, Tangle (2 members, 339 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Upcoming Birthdays: DrJones*, willietern
Post Volume:
Total: 821,063 Year: 25,669/21,208 Month: 1,296/2,338 Week: 53/364 Day: 4/49 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions

Internal Message Text
[qs]You have to face up to the facts if there is no known or at least plausible mechanism that could account for a spontaneous generation, we are left to conclude that a higher-intellegence is responsible for life.[/qs]

A thousand years ago there was no known or at least plausible mechanism that count account for lightning so our Viking friends concluded it was Thor throwing hammers at the giants. They were wrong.

In fact, the history of science is littered with such examples, once upon a time people in their ignorance concluded that some supernatural entity or doodad was responsible for the things they couldn't explain. Time and time again they've been proven wrong by scientists working away at a problem until they find the answer.

What reason can you give to believe that in this case not knowing how it happened should lead to the repeatedly discredited conclusion that goddidit?

Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017