Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 136 (8434 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-31-2015 3:47 PM
136 online now:
Coragyps, Omnivorous, PaulK, Percy (Admin), RAZD, Stile, Tangle, xongsmith (8 members, 128 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Biblewarrior
Upcoming Birthdays: garabella60, GW1971, jingpaler, jpowder50, matsunagakyle, michlagayu, Omnivorous, poNdsstay, powersamor29, ropyli, sakohan950
Post Volume:
Total: 766,533 Year: 21,491/30,875 Month: 2,123/4,092 Week: 174/622 Day: 70/104 Hour: 7/11

Internal Message Text
 
 
 
 
 
[qs]I suggest if you wish to continue that line of discussion, you propose a new thread.[/qs]

Thanks for merging my names, that was not some sneeky attempt by myself.

How about the title 'The obvious desgn of desgn' and we pick up where we left off, without me writting out an OP, is that possible?

Or do I need an OP

Dawn Bertot

Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2015