Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 158 (8094 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-22-2014 11:25 PM
192 online now:
Coyote, edge, hooah212002, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), roxrkool, Taz (6 members, 186 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: yudi
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 732,951 Year: 18,792/28,606 Month: 2,063/2,305 Week: 268/671 Day: 114/68 Hour: 2/3

Internal Message Text
 
 
 
 
[qs][qs]Syllogism 1
Premise 1: Entropy always grows (second law of thermodynamics)[/qs]
Wrong, entropy can decrease, at least, in an open system. And even in a closed system, entropy can locally decrease.[/qs]

But the average trend will be towards entropy, otherwise the second law of thermodynamics doesnt goes ...(what is the right word? Up? count?)

But premise 1/2 can be replaced by anything that proves the universe is not infinite, like: if the universe excisted for an infinite time, we could not have a tomorrow. As we would have more than infinite days.

[qs]There is no evidence for this. Further, "cause" implies a "before", there was no "before" the big bang, just like there is no "north" of the north pole.[/qs]

But the question I have, is: what caused the big bang?
Because it either must have a cause, or a supernatural power created it. (To translate in your example: When you're reached the north pole, you've found the cause for it being the north pole the magnetic field. If you've reached the big bang, you would find the cause.)

Oh and you're right PaulK. I ain't a native English speaker, I agree with you that begins fits the context better.

Copyright 2001-2014 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2014