Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 0/1

EvC Forum ⇒ All Forums ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Big Bang and Cosmology ⇒

The Big Bang and the visible past.

Key: •Answered, •Noted, •Unanswered
Originator: opfresco, 11-16-2009 7:14 AM
  Msg
Num 		Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By opfresco
11-16-2009 7:14 AM
  
•Message 3
By Modulous
11-16-2009 8:33 AM
•A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 5)
By Yrreg
09-19-2010 5:46 PM
Topic's mood 2 Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
By Admin
11-16-2009 8:19 AM
    
Topic's mood 3 Message 3
By Modulous
11-16-2009 8:33 AM
 Message 1
By opfresco
11-16-2009 7:14 AM
•Message 4
By opfresco
11-17-2009 3:44 AM
Topic's mood 4 Message 4
By opfresco
11-17-2009 3:44 AM
 Message 3
By Modulous
11-16-2009 8:33 AM
  
Topic's mood 5 A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 5)
By Yrreg
09-19-2010 5:46 PM
 Message 1
By opfresco
11-16-2009 7:14 AM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 6)
By Huntard
09-19-2010 5:53 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 7)
By cavediver
09-19-2010 5:55 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 8)
By frako
09-19-2010 5:59 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 9)
By nwr
09-19-2010 6:03 PM
Topic's mood 6 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 6)
By Huntard
09-19-2010 5:53 PM
 A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 5)
By Yrreg
09-19-2010 5:46 PM
  
Topic's mood 7 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 7)
By cavediver
09-19-2010 5:55 PM
 A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 5)
By Yrreg
09-19-2010 5:46 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 10)
By jar
09-19-2010 6:07 PM
Topic's mood 8 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 8)
By frako
09-19-2010 5:59 PM
 A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 5)
By Yrreg
09-19-2010 5:46 PM
  
Topic's mood 9 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 9)
By nwr
09-19-2010 6:03 PM
 A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 5)
By Yrreg
09-19-2010 5:46 PM
  
Topic's mood 10 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 10)
By jar
09-19-2010 6:07 PM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 7)
By cavediver
09-19-2010 5:55 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 11)
By Tanypteryx
09-19-2010 6:23 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 15)
By Omnivorous
09-21-2010 11:21 AM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 78)
By RCS
10-02-2010 2:04 AM
Topic's mood 11 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 11)
By Tanypteryx
09-19-2010 6:23 PM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 10)
By jar
09-19-2010 6:07 PM
  
Topic's mood 12 Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 12)
By Yrreg
09-20-2010 5:15 PM
  
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 13)
By frako
09-20-2010 5:19 PM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 14)
By Blue Jay
09-21-2010 11:04 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 21)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 3:49 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 30)
By Phat
09-22-2010 10:41 AM
Topic's mood 13 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 13)
By frako
09-20-2010 5:19 PM
 Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 12)
By Yrreg
09-20-2010 5:15 PM
  
Topic's mood 14 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 14)
By Blue Jay
09-21-2010 11:04 AM
 Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 12)
By Yrreg
09-20-2010 5:15 PM
  
Topic's mood 15 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 15)
By Omnivorous
09-21-2010 11:21 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 10)
By jar
09-19-2010 6:07 PM
  
Topic's mood 16 Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 16)
By Yrreg
09-21-2010 6:25 PM
  
•Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 17)
By Omnivorous
09-21-2010 6:54 PM
•Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 18)
By Nij
09-21-2010 9:45 PM
•Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 19)
By onifre
09-21-2010 10:00 PM
•Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 20)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 3:06 AM
Topic's mood 17 Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 17)
By Omnivorous
09-21-2010 6:54 PM
 Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 16)
By Yrreg
09-21-2010 6:25 PM
  
Topic's mood 18 Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 18)
By Nij
09-21-2010 9:45 PM
 Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 16)
By Yrreg
09-21-2010 6:25 PM
  
Topic's mood 19 Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 19)
By onifre
09-21-2010 10:00 PM
 Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 16)
By Yrreg
09-21-2010 6:25 PM
  
Topic's mood 20 Re: Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 20)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 3:06 AM
 Okay, now that you have situated yourself inside a box, you don't think... (Message 16)
By Yrreg
09-21-2010 6:25 PM
  
Topic's mood 21 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 21)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 3:49 AM
 Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 12)
By Yrreg
09-20-2010 5:15 PM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 22)
By Larni
09-22-2010 4:21 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 24)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 7:52 AM
Topic's mood 22 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 22)
By Larni
09-22-2010 4:21 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 21)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 3:49 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 23)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 6:47 AM
Topic's mood 23 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 23)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 6:47 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 22)
By Larni
09-22-2010 4:21 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 27)
By Larni
09-22-2010 8:34 AM
Topic's mood 24 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 24)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 7:52 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 21)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 3:49 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 25)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 8:08 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 26)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 8:09 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 28)
By Larni
09-22-2010 8:40 AM
Topic's mood 25 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 25)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 8:08 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 24)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 7:52 AM
•Re: Hunter's Randed Yada (Message 34)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:31 AM
Topic's mood 26 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 26)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 8:09 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 24)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 7:52 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 32)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:01 AM
Topic's mood 27 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 27)
By Larni
09-22-2010 8:34 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 23)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 6:47 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 29)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 10:33 AM
Topic's mood 28 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 28)
By Larni
09-22-2010 8:40 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 24)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 7:52 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 33)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:25 AM
Topic's mood 29 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 29)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 10:33 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 27)
By Larni
09-22-2010 8:34 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 31)
By Larni
09-22-2010 10:43 AM
Topic's mood 30 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 30)
By Phat
09-22-2010 10:41 AM
 Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 12)
By Yrreg
09-20-2010 5:15 PM
  
Topic's mood 31 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 31)
By Larni
09-22-2010 10:43 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 29)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 10:33 AM
  
Topic's mood 32 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 32)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:01 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 26)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 8:09 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 36)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 11:58 AM
Topic's mood 33 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 33)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:25 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 28)
By Larni
09-22-2010 8:40 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 35)
By jar
09-22-2010 11:45 AM
•Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 37)
By Larni
09-22-2010 12:29 PM
Topic's mood 34 Re: Hunter's Randed Yada (Message 34)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:31 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 25)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 8:08 AM
•Re: Hunter's Randed Yada (Message 38)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 12:51 PM
Topic's mood 35 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 35)
By jar
09-22-2010 11:45 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 33)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:25 AM
  
Topic's mood 36 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 36)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 11:58 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 32)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:01 AM
•Re: Incomprehension (Message 39)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:04 AM
Topic's mood 37 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 37)
By Larni
09-22-2010 12:29 PM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 33)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:25 AM
•Re: Supportive Evidence (Message 41)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:26 AM
Topic's mood 38 Re: Hunter's Randed Yada (Message 38)
By Huntard
09-22-2010 12:51 PM
 Re: Hunter's Randed Yada (Message 34)
By Buzsaw
09-22-2010 11:31 AM
  
Topic's mood 39 Re: Incomprehension (Message 39)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:04 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 36)
By cavediver
09-22-2010 11:58 AM
•Re: Incomprehension (Message 40)
By nwr
09-24-2010 12:21 AM
•Re: Incomprehension (Message 47)
By cavediver
09-24-2010 4:11 AM
Topic's mood 40 Re: Incomprehension (Message 40)
By nwr
09-24-2010 12:21 AM
 Re: Incomprehension (Message 39)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:04 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 42)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:49 AM
Topic's mood 41 Re: Supportive Evidence (Message 41)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:26 AM
 Re: Is that attitude intelligent, not to go further than the big bang? (Message 37)
By Larni
09-22-2010 12:29 PM
  
Topic's mood 42 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 42)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:49 AM
 Re: Incomprehension (Message 40)
By nwr
09-24-2010 12:21 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 43)
By nwr
09-24-2010 12:58 AM
Topic's mood 43 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 43)
By nwr
09-24-2010 12:58 AM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 42)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:49 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 44)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:45 AM
Topic's mood 44 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 44)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:45 AM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 43)
By nwr
09-24-2010 12:58 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 45)
By nwr
09-24-2010 2:10 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 46)
By frako
09-24-2010 2:12 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 61)
By cavediver
09-24-2010 6:22 PM
Topic's mood 45 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 45)
By nwr
09-24-2010 2:10 AM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 44)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:45 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 48)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 9:13 AM
Topic's mood 46 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 46)
By frako
09-24-2010 2:12 AM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 44)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:45 AM
  
Topic's mood 47 Re: Incomprehension (Message 47)
By cavediver
09-24-2010 4:11 AM
 Re: Incomprehension (Message 39)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 12:04 AM
  
Topic's mood 48 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 48)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 9:13 AM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 45)
By nwr
09-24-2010 2:10 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 49)
By Huntard
09-24-2010 9:49 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 51)
By nwr
09-24-2010 10:35 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 52)
By jar
09-24-2010 10:35 AM
•Dereailing again? (Message 53)
By Theodoric
09-24-2010 10:42 AM
Topic's mood 49 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 49)
By Huntard
09-24-2010 9:49 AM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 48)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 9:13 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 50)
By nwr
09-24-2010 10:31 AM
Topic's mood 50 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 50)
By nwr
09-24-2010 10:31 AM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 49)
By Huntard
09-24-2010 9:49 AM
  
Topic's mood 51 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 51)
By nwr
09-24-2010 10:35 AM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 48)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 9:13 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 55)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:36 PM
Topic's mood 52 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 52)
By jar
09-24-2010 10:35 AM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 48)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 9:13 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 56)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:48 PM
Topic's mood 53 Dereailing again? (Message 53)
By Theodoric
09-24-2010 10:42 AM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 48)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 9:13 AM
•Re: Dereailing again? (Message 54)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:34 PM
Topic's mood 54 Re: Dereailing again? (Message 54)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:34 PM
 Dereailing again? (Message 53)
By Theodoric
09-24-2010 10:42 AM
•Re: Dereailing again? (Message 57)
By Son
09-24-2010 1:58 PM
•Re: Dereailing again? (Message 60)
By onifre
09-24-2010 5:43 PM
Topic's mood 55 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 55)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:36 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 51)
By nwr
09-24-2010 10:35 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 59)
By nwr
09-24-2010 2:33 PM
Topic's mood 56 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 56)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:48 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 52)
By jar
09-24-2010 10:35 AM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 58)
By jar
09-24-2010 2:07 PM
Topic's mood 57 Re: Dereailing again? (Message 57)
By Son
09-24-2010 1:58 PM
 Re: Dereailing again? (Message 54)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:34 PM
  
Topic's mood 58 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 58)
By jar
09-24-2010 2:07 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 56)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:48 PM
  
Topic's mood 59 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 59)
By nwr
09-24-2010 2:33 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 55)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:36 PM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 62)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 7:31 PM
Topic's mood 60 Re: Dereailing again? (Message 60)
By onifre
09-24-2010 5:43 PM
 Re: Dereailing again? (Message 54)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:34 PM
  
Topic's mood 61 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 61)
By cavediver
09-24-2010 6:22 PM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 44)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 1:45 AM
•Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 66)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 8:44 PM
Topic's mood 62 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 62)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 7:31 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 59)
By nwr
09-24-2010 2:33 PM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 63)
By AZPaul3
09-24-2010 7:48 PM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 64)
By frako
09-24-2010 7:55 PM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 65)
By jar
09-24-2010 8:16 PM
•Re: Redefining Definition (Message 69)
By nwr
09-24-2010 11:01 PM
Topic's mood 63 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 63)
By AZPaul3
09-24-2010 7:48 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 62)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 7:31 PM
  
Topic's mood 64 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 64)
By frako
09-24-2010 7:55 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 62)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 7:31 PM
  
Topic's mood 65 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 65)
By jar
09-24-2010 8:16 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 62)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 7:31 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 67)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 10:28 PM
Topic's mood 66 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 66)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 8:44 PM
 Re: Comprehending terms. (Message 61)
By cavediver
09-24-2010 6:22 PM
  
Topic's mood 67 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 67)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 10:28 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 65)
By jar
09-24-2010 8:16 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 68)
By jar
09-24-2010 10:41 PM
Topic's mood 68 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 68)
By jar
09-24-2010 10:41 PM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 67)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 10:28 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 70)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 11:03 PM
Topic's mood 69 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 69)
By nwr
09-24-2010 11:01 PM
 Re: Redefining Definition (Message 62)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 7:31 PM
  
Topic's mood 70 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 70)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 11:03 PM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 68)
By jar
09-24-2010 10:41 PM
•So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 71)
By jar
09-24-2010 11:15 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 72)
By DevilsAdvocate
09-25-2010 8:08 AM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 79)
By Dr Adequate
10-02-2010 2:49 AM
Topic's mood 71 So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 71)
By jar
09-24-2010 11:15 PM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 70)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 11:03 PM
•Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 73)
By Buzsaw
09-25-2010 8:14 AM
Topic's mood 72 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 72)
By DevilsAdvocate
09-25-2010 8:08 AM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 70)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 11:03 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 74)
By Buzsaw
09-25-2010 8:33 AM
Topic's mood 73 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 73)
By Buzsaw
09-25-2010 8:14 AM
 So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 71)
By jar
09-24-2010 11:15 PM
•Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 75)
By DevilsAdvocate
09-25-2010 8:39 AM
•Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 76)
By jar
09-25-2010 11:28 AM
Topic's mood 74 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 74)
By Buzsaw
09-25-2010 8:33 AM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 72)
By DevilsAdvocate
09-25-2010 8:08 AM
  
Topic's mood 75 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 75)
By DevilsAdvocate
09-25-2010 8:39 AM
 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 73)
By Buzsaw
09-25-2010 8:14 AM
•Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 77)
By Buzsaw
09-27-2010 9:50 PM
Topic's mood 76 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 76)
By jar
09-25-2010 11:28 AM
 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 73)
By Buzsaw
09-25-2010 8:14 AM
  
Topic's mood 77 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 77)
By Buzsaw
09-27-2010 9:50 PM
 Re: So present the evidence Buz!!!!!!!!! (Message 75)
By DevilsAdvocate
09-25-2010 8:39 AM
  
Topic's mood 78 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 78)
By RCS
10-02-2010 2:04 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 10)
By jar
09-19-2010 6:07 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 80)
By jar
10-02-2010 10:27 AM
Topic's mood 79 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 79)
By Dr Adequate
10-02-2010 2:49 AM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 70)
By Buzsaw
09-24-2010 11:03 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 87)
By Buzsaw
10-05-2010 5:43 PM
Topic's mood 80 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 80)
By jar
10-02-2010 10:27 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 78)
By RCS
10-02-2010 2:04 AM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 81)
By anglagard
10-02-2010 12:25 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 82)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:08 AM
Topic's mood 81 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 81)
By anglagard
10-02-2010 12:25 PM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 80)
By jar
10-02-2010 10:27 AM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 83)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:15 AM
Topic's mood 82 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 82)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:08 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 80)
By jar
10-02-2010 10:27 AM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 85)
By Nij
10-05-2010 6:25 AM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 86)
By jar
10-05-2010 10:08 AM
Topic's mood 83 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 83)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:15 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 81)
By anglagard
10-02-2010 12:25 PM
•Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 84)
By Nij
10-05-2010 5:54 AM
Topic's mood 84 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 84)
By Nij
10-05-2010 5:54 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 83)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:15 AM
  
Topic's mood 85 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 85)
By Nij
10-05-2010 6:25 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 82)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:08 AM
  
Topic's mood 86 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 86)
By jar
10-05-2010 10:08 AM
 Re: A purely scientific background is not the whole picture of existence. (Message 82)
By RCS
10-05-2010 12:08 AM
  
Topic's mood 87 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 87)
By Buzsaw
10-05-2010 5:43 PM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 79)
By Dr Adequate
10-02-2010 2:49 AM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 88)
By onifre
10-05-2010 5:53 PM
Topic's mood 88 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 88)
By onifre
10-05-2010 5:53 PM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 87)
By Buzsaw
10-05-2010 5:43 PM
•Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 89)
By Buzsaw
10-05-2010 7:40 PM
Topic's mood 89 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 89)
By Buzsaw
10-05-2010 7:40 PM
 Re: Visionary Models Of The Alleged Past (Message 88)
By onifre
10-05-2010 5:53 PM
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)

Thread is open and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is open and has recent unread messages.
Thread is open and very active, but has no unread messages.
Thread is open, very active, and has unread messages.
Thread is closed and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is closed and has recent unread messages.
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024