Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 108 (8806 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 12-16-2017 9:12 PM
257 online now:
jar, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), Rrhain (3 members, 254 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Post Volume:
Total: 824,399 Year: 29,005/21,208 Month: 1,071/1,847 Week: 446/475 Day: 109/102 Hour: 1/1

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions

EvC Forum All Forums Social and Religious Issues Faith and Belief Science proves that the tomb of Jesus (Christ ?)and James the Just have been found.

Key: Answered, Noted, Unanswered
Originator: LamarkNewAge, 01-13-2017 4:29 PM
  Msg
Num
Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
 
Conclusion (Message 3)
By Phat
01-14-2017 2:32 PM
Message 4
By frako
01-14-2017 7:10 PM
so what's the evidence? (Message 6)
By Modulous
01-15-2017 10:42 AM
Message 8
By Phat
01-15-2017 11:50 AM
Message 24
By caffeine
01-16-2017 1:46 PM
Message 46
By Theodoric
02-01-2017 8:54 PM
Topic's mood 2 Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
By Admin
01-14-2017 7:49 AM
   
Topic's mood 3 Conclusion (Message 3)
By Phat
01-14-2017 2:32 PM
Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 5)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 3:48 AM
Phat and his issues. (Message 28)
By LamarkNewAge
01-19-2017 3:11 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 32)
By ringo
01-20-2017 11:05 AM
Topic's mood 4 Message 4
By frako
01-14-2017 7:10 PM
Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
Message 20
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:13 AM
Topic's mood 5 Re: Conclusion (Message 5)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 3:48 AM
Conclusion (Message 3)
By Phat
01-14-2017 2:32 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 7)
By Phat
01-15-2017 11:46 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 14)
By NoNukes
01-16-2017 2:52 AM
Topic's mood 6 so what's the evidence? (Message 6)
By Modulous
01-15-2017 10:42 AM
Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
 
Topic's mood 7 Re: Conclusion (Message 7)
By Phat
01-15-2017 11:46 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 5)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 3:48 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 10)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 12:31 PM
Topic's mood 8 Message 8
By Phat
01-15-2017 11:50 AM
Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
Message 9
By Porosity
01-15-2017 12:10 PM
Topic's mood 9 Message 9
By Porosity
01-15-2017 12:10 PM
Message 8
By Phat
01-15-2017 11:50 AM
Faith and Science (Message 11)
By Phat
01-15-2017 3:28 PM
Topic's mood 10 Re: Conclusion (Message 10)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 12:31 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 7)
By Phat
01-15-2017 11:46 AM
 
Topic's mood 11 Faith and Science (Message 11)
By Phat
01-15-2017 3:28 PM
Message 9
By Porosity
01-15-2017 12:10 PM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 12)
By Porosity
01-15-2017 4:04 PM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 13)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 6:16 PM
Topic's mood 12 Re: Faith and Science (Message 12)
By Porosity
01-15-2017 4:04 PM
Faith and Science (Message 11)
By Phat
01-15-2017 3:28 PM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 16)
By Phat
01-16-2017 6:41 AM
Topic's mood 13 Re: Faith and Science (Message 13)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 6:16 PM
Faith and Science (Message 11)
By Phat
01-15-2017 3:28 PM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 17)
By Phat
01-16-2017 6:50 AM
Topic's mood 14 Re: Conclusion (Message 14)
By NoNukes
01-16-2017 2:52 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 5)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 3:48 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 15)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:14 AM
Topic's mood 15 Re: Conclusion (Message 15)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:14 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 14)
By NoNukes
01-16-2017 2:52 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 25)
By NoNukes
01-16-2017 3:26 PM
Topic's mood 16 Re: Faith and Science (Message 16)
By Phat
01-16-2017 6:41 AM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 12)
By Porosity
01-15-2017 4:04 PM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 19)
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:11 AM
Topic's mood 17 Re: Faith and Science (Message 17)
By Phat
01-16-2017 6:50 AM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 13)
By Tangle
01-15-2017 6:16 PM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 18)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 8:11 AM
Topic's mood 18 Re: Faith and Science (Message 18)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 8:11 AM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 17)
By Phat
01-16-2017 6:50 AM
 
Topic's mood 19 Re: Faith and Science (Message 19)
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:11 AM
Re: Faith and Science (Message 16)
By Phat
01-16-2017 6:41 AM
 
Topic's mood 20 Message 20
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:13 AM
Message 4
By frako
01-14-2017 7:10 PM
Message 21
By vimesey
01-16-2017 11:22 AM
Topic's mood 21 Message 21
By vimesey
01-16-2017 11:22 AM
Message 20
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:13 AM
Message 22
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:36 AM
Topic's mood 22 Message 22
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:36 AM
Message 21
By vimesey
01-16-2017 11:22 AM
Message 23
By vimesey
01-16-2017 11:44 AM
Topic's mood 23 Message 23
By vimesey
01-16-2017 11:44 AM
Message 22
By ringo
01-16-2017 11:36 AM
 
Topic's mood 24 Message 24
By caffeine
01-16-2017 1:46 PM
Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
 
Topic's mood 25 Re: Conclusion (Message 25)
By NoNukes
01-16-2017 3:26 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 15)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:14 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 26)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:35 PM
Topic's mood 26 Re: Conclusion (Message 26)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:35 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 25)
By NoNukes
01-16-2017 3:26 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 27)
By Modulous
01-16-2017 4:18 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 29)
By NoNukes
01-19-2017 9:38 PM
Topic's mood 27 Re: Conclusion (Message 27)
By Modulous
01-16-2017 4:18 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 26)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 28 Phat and his issues. (Message 28)
By LamarkNewAge
01-19-2017 3:11 PM
Conclusion (Message 3)
By Phat
01-14-2017 2:32 PM
 
Topic's mood 29 Re: Conclusion (Message 29)
By NoNukes
01-19-2017 9:38 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 26)
By Tangle
01-16-2017 3:35 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 30)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 3:19 AM
Topic's mood 30 Re: Conclusion (Message 30)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 3:19 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 29)
By NoNukes
01-19-2017 9:38 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 31)
By Phat
01-20-2017 7:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 37)
By NoNukes
01-20-2017 3:48 PM
Topic's mood 31 Re: Conclusion (Message 31)
By Phat
01-20-2017 7:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 30)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 3:19 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 34)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 12:57 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 78)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 1:58 PM
Topic's mood 32 Re: Conclusion (Message 32)
By ringo
01-20-2017 11:05 AM
Conclusion (Message 3)
By Phat
01-14-2017 2:32 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 33)
By Phat
01-20-2017 12:27 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 55)
By Phat
11-04-2017 12:45 PM
Topic's mood 33 Re: Conclusion (Message 33)
By Phat
01-20-2017 12:27 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 32)
By ringo
01-20-2017 11:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 35)
By Porosity
01-20-2017 1:09 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 36)
By LamarkNewAge
01-20-2017 3:29 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 43)
By ringo
01-23-2017 10:47 AM
Topic's mood 34 Re: Conclusion (Message 34)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 12:57 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 31)
By Phat
01-20-2017 7:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 41)
By Phat
01-21-2017 4:32 AM
Topic's mood 35 Re: Conclusion (Message 35)
By Porosity
01-20-2017 1:09 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 33)
By Phat
01-20-2017 12:27 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 45)
By Theodoric
02-01-2017 8:53 PM
Topic's mood 36 Re: Conclusion (Message 36)
By LamarkNewAge
01-20-2017 3:29 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 33)
By Phat
01-20-2017 12:27 PM
 
Topic's mood 37 Re: Conclusion (Message 37)
By NoNukes
01-20-2017 3:48 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 30)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 3:19 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 38)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 6:02 PM
Topic's mood 38 Re: Conclusion (Message 38)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 6:02 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 37)
By NoNukes
01-20-2017 3:48 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 39)
By NoNukes
01-20-2017 7:22 PM
Topic's mood 39 Re: Conclusion (Message 39)
By NoNukes
01-20-2017 7:22 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 38)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 6:02 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 40)
By Tangle
01-21-2017 3:29 AM
Topic's mood 40 Re: Conclusion (Message 40)
By Tangle
01-21-2017 3:29 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 39)
By NoNukes
01-20-2017 7:22 PM
 
Topic's mood 41 Re: Conclusion (Message 41)
By Phat
01-21-2017 4:32 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 34)
By Tangle
01-20-2017 12:57 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 42)
By Tangle
01-21-2017 5:05 AM
Topic's mood 42 Re: Conclusion (Message 42)
By Tangle
01-21-2017 5:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 41)
By Phat
01-21-2017 4:32 AM
 
Topic's mood 43 Re: Conclusion (Message 43)
By ringo
01-23-2017 10:47 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 33)
By Phat
01-20-2017 12:27 PM
 
Topic's mood 44 While we are discussig a "literal definition" of "delusion" vs "subjective evidence" (Message 44)
By LamarkNewAge
02-01-2017 3:43 PM
   
Topic's mood 45 Re: Conclusion (Message 45)
By Theodoric
02-01-2017 8:53 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 35)
By Porosity
01-20-2017 1:09 PM
 
Topic's mood 46 Message 46
By Theodoric
02-01-2017 8:54 PM
Message 1
By LamarkNewAge
01-13-2017 4:29 PM
 
Topic's mood 47 More on visions and the rising from the dead issue among scholars. (Message 47)
By LamarkNewAge
02-28-2017 3:23 PM
   
Topic's mood 48 Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 48)
By LamarkNewAge
03-15-2017 3:41 PM
 
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 49)
By Theodoric
03-15-2017 5:49 PM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 52)
By caffeine
03-16-2017 2:30 PM
Topic's mood 49 Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 49)
By Theodoric
03-15-2017 5:49 PM
Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 48)
By LamarkNewAge
03-15-2017 3:41 PM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 50)
By LamarkNewAge
03-15-2017 8:06 PM
Some views of Tabor are. (Message 51)
By LamarkNewAge
03-16-2017 12:38 PM
Re Richard Carrier: Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (just read link) (Message 59)
By LamarkNewAge
11-19-2017 12:21 AM
Topic's mood 50 Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 50)
By LamarkNewAge
03-15-2017 8:06 PM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 49)
By Theodoric
03-15-2017 5:49 PM
 
Topic's mood 51 Some views of Tabor are. (Message 51)
By LamarkNewAge
03-16-2017 12:38 PM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 49)
By Theodoric
03-15-2017 5:49 PM
 
Topic's mood 52 Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 52)
By caffeine
03-16-2017 2:30 PM
Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 48)
By LamarkNewAge
03-15-2017 3:41 PM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 53)
By LamarkNewAge
03-16-2017 5:57 PM
Topic's mood 53 Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 53)
By LamarkNewAge
03-16-2017 5:57 PM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 52)
By caffeine
03-16-2017 2:30 PM
 
Topic's mood 54 Origen of Alexandria on the defensive against the pagan Celsus. (Message 54)
By LamarkNewAge
04-03-2017 11:01 PM
   
Topic's mood 55 Re: Conclusion (Message 55)
By Phat
11-04-2017 12:45 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 32)
By ringo
01-20-2017 11:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 56)
By ringo
11-05-2017 2:08 PM
Topic's mood 56 Re: Conclusion (Message 56)
By ringo
11-05-2017 2:08 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 55)
By Phat
11-04-2017 12:45 PM
Metaphors Galore (Message 57)
By Phat
11-05-2017 3:02 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 61)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:13 AM
Topic's mood 57 Metaphors Galore (Message 57)
By Phat
11-05-2017 3:02 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 56)
By ringo
11-05-2017 2:08 PM
Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 58)
By ringo
11-06-2017 10:40 AM
Topic's mood 58 Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 58)
By ringo
11-06-2017 10:40 AM
Metaphors Galore (Message 57)
By Phat
11-05-2017 3:02 PM
Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 60)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:04 AM
Topic's mood 59 Re Richard Carrier: Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (just read link) (Message 59)
By LamarkNewAge
11-19-2017 12:21 AM
Re: Is Mary Magdalene called “Mariamene Mara” (compelling evidence) (Message 49)
By Theodoric
03-15-2017 5:49 PM
 
Topic's mood 60 Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 60)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:04 AM
Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 58)
By ringo
11-06-2017 10:40 AM
Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 65)
By ringo
11-19-2017 1:28 PM
"Mariamne is the name of Mary Magdalene...that’s the missing piece, that’s the Ringo" (Message 67)
By LamarkNewAge
11-19-2017 10:14 PM
Topic's mood 61 Re: Conclusion (Message 61)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:13 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 56)
By ringo
11-05-2017 2:08 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 62)
By Tangle
11-19-2017 9:04 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 66)
By ringo
11-19-2017 1:34 PM
Topic's mood 62 Re: Conclusion (Message 62)
By Tangle
11-19-2017 9:04 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 61)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:13 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 63)
By Phat
11-19-2017 9:10 AM
Topic's mood 63 Re: Conclusion (Message 63)
By Phat
11-19-2017 9:10 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 62)
By Tangle
11-19-2017 9:04 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 64)
By Tangle
11-19-2017 9:45 AM
Topic's mood 64 Re: Conclusion (Message 64)
By Tangle
11-19-2017 9:45 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 63)
By Phat
11-19-2017 9:10 AM
 
Topic's mood 65 Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 65)
By ringo
11-19-2017 1:28 PM
Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 60)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:04 AM
 
Topic's mood 66 Re: Conclusion (Message 66)
By ringo
11-19-2017 1:34 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 61)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:13 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 69)
By Phat
11-20-2017 2:39 AM
Topic's mood 67 "Mariamne is the name of Mary Magdalene...that’s the missing piece, that’s the Ringo" (Message 67)
By LamarkNewAge
11-19-2017 10:14 PM
Re: Metaphors Galore (Message 60)
By Phat
11-19-2017 3:04 AM
Re: "Mariamne is the name of Mary Magdalene...that’s the missing piece, that’s the Ringo" (Message 68)
By Phat
11-20-2017 2:36 AM
Topic's mood 68 Re: "Mariamne is the name of Mary Magdalene...that’s the missing piece, that’s the Ringo" (Message 68)
By Phat
11-20-2017 2:36 AM
"Mariamne is the name of Mary Magdalene...that’s the missing piece, that’s the Ringo" (Message 67)
By LamarkNewAge
11-19-2017 10:14 PM
Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 70)
By LamarkNewAge
11-20-2017 11:54 PM
Topic's mood 69 Re: Conclusion (Message 69)
By Phat
11-20-2017 2:39 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 66)
By ringo
11-19-2017 1:34 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 72)
By ringo
11-21-2017 10:46 AM
Topic's mood 70 Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 70)
By LamarkNewAge
11-20-2017 11:54 PM
Re: "Mariamne is the name of Mary Magdalene...that’s the missing piece, that’s the Ringo" (Message 68)
By Phat
11-20-2017 2:36 AM
Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 76)
By Phat
11-22-2017 1:09 PM
Topic's mood 71 Science proves? (Message 71)
By Coyote
11-21-2017 12:22 AM
 
Re: Science proves? (Message 73)
By LamarkNewAge
11-21-2017 9:55 PM
Re: Science proves? Here is the caption text from the article. (Message 74)
By LamarkNewAge
11-21-2017 10:01 PM
Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 88)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 5:19 PM
Topic's mood 72 Re: Conclusion (Message 72)
By ringo
11-21-2017 10:46 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 69)
By Phat
11-20-2017 2:39 AM
 
Topic's mood 73 Re: Science proves? (Message 73)
By LamarkNewAge
11-21-2017 9:55 PM
Science proves? (Message 71)
By Coyote
11-21-2017 12:22 AM
 
Topic's mood 74 Re: Science proves? Here is the caption text from the article. (Message 74)
By LamarkNewAge
11-21-2017 10:01 PM
Science proves? (Message 71)
By Coyote
11-21-2017 12:22 AM
 
Topic's mood 75 The SCIENTIFIC soil composition issue again. (Message 75)
By LamarkNewAge
11-21-2017 10:38 PM
   
Topic's mood 76 Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 76)
By Phat
11-22-2017 1:09 PM
Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 70)
By LamarkNewAge
11-20-2017 11:54 PM
Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 77)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 1:35 PM
Topic's mood 77 Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 77)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 1:35 PM
Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 76)
By Phat
11-22-2017 1:09 PM
Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 82)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:11 PM
Topic's mood 78 Re: Conclusion (Message 78)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 1:58 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 31)
By Phat
01-20-2017 7:05 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 79)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 2:21 PM
Topic's mood 79 Re: Conclusion (Message 79)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 2:21 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 78)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 1:58 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 80)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 3:10 PM
Topic's mood 80 Re: Conclusion (Message 80)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 3:10 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 79)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 2:21 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 81)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 3:49 PM
Topic's mood 81 Re: Conclusion (Message 81)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 3:49 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 80)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 3:10 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 83)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:14 PM
Topic's mood 82 Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 82)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:11 PM
Re: Evidence that Apostolic tradition that Catholics and Protestants accept is FALSE. (Message 77)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 1:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 83 Re: Conclusion (Message 83)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:14 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 81)
By New Cat's Eye
11-22-2017 3:49 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 84)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:22 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 106)
By New Cat's Eye
12-04-2017 11:32 AM
Topic's mood 84 Re: Conclusion (Message 84)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:22 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 83)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:14 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 85)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:43 PM
Topic's mood 85 Re: Conclusion (Message 85)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:43 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 84)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:22 PM
Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 86)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:59 PM
Topic's mood 86 Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 86)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:59 PM
Re: Conclusion (Message 85)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:43 PM
Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 87)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 5:15 PM
Topic's mood 87 Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 87)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 5:15 PM
Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 86)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 4:59 PM
Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 89)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 5:22 PM
Topic's mood 88 Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 88)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 5:19 PM
Science proves? (Message 71)
By Coyote
11-21-2017 12:22 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 91)
By Coyote
11-22-2017 10:07 PM
Topic's mood 89 Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 89)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 5:22 PM
Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 87)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 5:15 PM
Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 90)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 5:30 PM
Topic's mood 90 Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 90)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 5:30 PM
Re: Tabor is accused of being a semi-closeted JEW-by-choice (Message 89)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 5:22 PM
 
Topic's mood 91 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 91)
By Coyote
11-22-2017 10:07 PM
Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 88)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 5:19 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 92)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 10:56 PM
Topic's mood 92 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 92)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 10:56 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 91)
By Coyote
11-22-2017 10:07 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 93)
By Pressie
11-23-2017 6:25 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 94)
By Phat
11-23-2017 9:36 AM
Topic's mood 93 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 93)
By Pressie
11-23-2017 6:25 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 92)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 10:56 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 95)
By LamarkNewAge
11-23-2017 9:50 AM
Topic's mood 94 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 94)
By Phat
11-23-2017 9:36 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 92)
By LamarkNewAge
11-22-2017 10:56 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 97)
By ringo
11-23-2017 10:48 AM
Topic's mood 95 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 95)
By LamarkNewAge
11-23-2017 9:50 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 93)
By Pressie
11-23-2017 6:25 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 96)
By Coyote
11-23-2017 10:45 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 102)
By caffeine
12-03-2017 1:41 PM
Topic's mood 96 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 96)
By Coyote
11-23-2017 10:45 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 95)
By LamarkNewAge
11-23-2017 9:50 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 99)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 3:25 AM
Topic's mood 97 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 97)
By ringo
11-23-2017 10:48 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 94)
By Phat
11-23-2017 9:36 AM
 
Topic's mood 98 A ray of sunshine (new James discovery is a semi-hot story December 2017 (Message 98)
By LamarkNewAge
12-02-2017 4:15 PM
   
Topic's mood 99 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 99)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 3:25 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 96)
By Coyote
11-23-2017 10:45 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 100)
By Coyote
12-03-2017 10:14 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 101)
By ringo
12-03-2017 1:35 PM
Topic's mood 100 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 100)
By Coyote
12-03-2017 10:14 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 99)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 3:25 AM
 
Topic's mood 101 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 101)
By ringo
12-03-2017 1:35 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 99)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 3:25 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 103)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 5:22 PM
Topic's mood 102 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 102)
By caffeine
12-03-2017 1:41 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 95)
By LamarkNewAge
11-23-2017 9:50 AM
 
Topic's mood 103 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 103)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 5:22 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 101)
By ringo
12-03-2017 1:35 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 104)
By Tangle
12-04-2017 3:53 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 105)
By ringo
12-04-2017 10:47 AM
Topic's mood 104 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 104)
By Tangle
12-04-2017 3:53 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 103)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 5:22 PM
 
Topic's mood 105 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 105)
By ringo
12-04-2017 10:47 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 103)
By kbertsche
12-03-2017 5:22 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 107)
By kbertsche
12-04-2017 1:13 PM
Topic's mood 106 Re: Conclusion (Message 106)
By New Cat's Eye
12-04-2017 11:32 AM
Re: Conclusion (Message 83)
By Aussie
11-22-2017 4:14 PM
 
Topic's mood 107 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 107)
By kbertsche
12-04-2017 1:13 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 105)
By ringo
12-04-2017 10:47 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 108)
By ringo
12-05-2017 10:58 AM
Topic's mood 108 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 108)
By ringo
12-05-2017 10:58 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 107)
By kbertsche
12-04-2017 1:13 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 109)
By kbertsche
12-05-2017 12:58 PM
Topic's mood 109 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 109)
By kbertsche
12-05-2017 12:58 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 108)
By ringo
12-05-2017 10:58 AM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 110)
By ringo
12-06-2017 2:08 PM
Topic's mood 110 Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 110)
By ringo
12-06-2017 2:08 PM
Re: Science can actually be flawed massively? (Message 109)
By kbertsche
12-05-2017 12:58 PM
 
Topic's mood 111 Candidia Moss on the "new" James textual discovery. (Message 111)
By LamarkNewAge
12-16-2017 12:57 AM
   

Thread is open and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is open and has recent unread messages.
Thread is open and very active, but has no unread messages.
Thread is open, very active, and has unread messages.
Thread is closed and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is closed and has recent unread messages.
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017