Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   abiogenesis hypothesis and the despair of professed materialist
kendemyer
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 135 (140529)
09-06-2004 10:29 PM


To: All
TO: ALL
Based on my reading of this issue the scientific community is not upbeat and has no real answers at this time regarding the abiogenesis hypothesis. I do not think they ever will obviously.
Sincerely,
Ken
TO: Jar
I really do not see much point in your question. I am not here to rack up debate points or play word games. If you wish to do additional research on this matter feel free. At this time, I am satisfied with what I have found on this issue.
Sincerely,
Ken

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by RAZD, posted 09-06-2004 10:36 PM kendemyer has not replied
 Message 135 by lfen, posted 09-12-2004 12:49 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 122 of 135 (140533)
09-06-2004 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by kendemyer
09-06-2004 10:29 PM


Re: To: All
To Ken:
You are free to have that opinion, no matter how factual or erroneous, as that is the beauty of America.
It also will have no bearing on the truth of the matter, nor on the reality of what did happen 3.5 billion years ago.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by kendemyer, posted 09-06-2004 10:29 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 123 of 135 (140652)
09-07-2004 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by kendemyer
09-03-2004 6:59 PM


Re: I now have the preponderance of evidence
quote:
Actually I will take just one lie from these gentlemen. Please do not cite disreputable behavior by a particular creationist and then try the logical fallacy of guilt by association. I insist on this because if you want to be a freethinker you need to avoid logical fallacies.
This site written by G. R. Morton lines out several instances where Hugh Ross ignores current scientific findings in order to keep his theories afloat. Therefore, if Hugh Ross is willing to ignore scientific evidence, then it is very possible that he would ignore any upbeat mood at a conference that supports views that he is opposed to philosophically. Therefore, we have to throw out Ross, and being that Fazale and Ross are co-authors of the quote in question, then we have to throw out the entire quote. Secondly, the one quote you offer from a professionaly trained scientist is not even from the meeting but from an abstract printed a year before the meeting.
Therefore, your quotes do not meet up with Fisher's criteria since quotes from one bad source does not history make.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by kendemyer, posted 09-03-2004 6:59 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 124 of 135 (140661)
09-07-2004 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by jar
09-06-2004 10:37 AM


Re: Hey Ken, for the seventh or so time
Tiki lights

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by jar, posted 09-06-2004 10:37 AM jar has not replied

  
kendemyer
Inactive Member


Message 125 of 135 (140679)
09-07-2004 1:35 PM


to: ALL
I for one am not a big fan of Hugh Ross. I am a YEC and I think he accepts big bang etc. I will let readers decide though if the Gr. Morton material is a case of Ross ignoring extremely empirically valid science or merely disputing science that is not very empirically established.

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Loudmouth, posted 09-07-2004 1:37 PM kendemyer has not replied
 Message 127 by jar, posted 09-07-2004 5:28 PM kendemyer has not replied
 Message 132 by AdminAsgara, posted 09-07-2004 8:29 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 126 of 135 (140680)
09-07-2004 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by kendemyer
09-07-2004 1:35 PM


Re: to: ALL
quote:
I will let readers decide though if the Gr. Morton material is a case of Ross ignoring extremely empirically valid science or merely disputing science that is not very empirically established.
I have decided that Hugh Ross is not a reliable witness given his track record. Therefore, all of your evidence of a "sour mood" is thrown out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by kendemyer, posted 09-07-2004 1:35 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 127 of 135 (140728)
09-07-2004 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by kendemyer
09-07-2004 1:35 PM


For the eighth time or so
What would make a convention upbeat?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by kendemyer, posted 09-07-2004 1:35 PM kendemyer has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Wounded King, posted 09-07-2004 6:03 PM jar has replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 128 of 135 (140740)
09-07-2004 6:03 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by jar
09-07-2004 5:28 PM


Re: For the eighth time or so
Free Beer?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by jar, posted 09-07-2004 5:28 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by jar, posted 09-07-2004 6:07 PM Wounded King has replied
 Message 130 by jar, posted 09-07-2004 6:07 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 129 of 135 (140741)
09-07-2004 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Wounded King
09-07-2004 6:03 PM


Re: For the eighth time or so
So far we have free beer, tikki torches and a couple other suggestions but not one word from Ken who made the unsupported assertion that the convention was downbeat. No one yet has suggested pretty girls, free goodie bags, free boiled shrimp or any of the other posibilities. My guess is that Ken, as usual, simply doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and so cannot answer.
This message has been edited by jar, 09-07-2004 05:09 PM

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Wounded King, posted 09-07-2004 6:03 PM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by Asgara, posted 09-07-2004 6:36 PM jar has not replied
 Message 134 by Wounded King, posted 09-08-2004 9:41 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 130 of 135 (140742)
09-07-2004 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Wounded King
09-07-2004 6:03 PM


Re: For the eighth time or so
Duplicate post, see above. Mea Culpa.
This message has been edited by jar, 09-07-2004 05:09 PM

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Wounded King, posted 09-07-2004 6:03 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Asgara
Member (Idle past 2323 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 131 of 135 (140749)
09-07-2004 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by jar
09-07-2004 6:07 PM


Re: For the eighth time or so
I had suggested an open bar, but beer alone is fine by me. Tikki torches, goodie bags and free shrimp make for a festive atmosphere, but the pretty girls don't really do much for me.

Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"
http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com
http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by jar, posted 09-07-2004 6:07 PM jar has not replied

  
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2323 days)
Posts: 2073
From: The Universe
Joined: 10-11-2003


Message 132 of 135 (140805)
09-07-2004 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by kendemyer
09-07-2004 1:35 PM


Re: to: ALL
Ken, please answer the question in this post
EvC Forum: abiogenesis hypothesis and the despair of professed materialist
Jar has asked you numerous times and I for one would like you to post a concise answer.
Please address this post
EvC Forum: abiogenesis hypothesis and the despair of professed materialist
Please give an actual answer to this post
EvC Forum: abiogenesis hypothesis and the despair of professed materialist
Posts in this thread other than direct answers to these questions will result in a suspension.

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe


http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com
http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by kendemyer, posted 09-07-2004 1:35 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Lindum
Member (Idle past 3417 days)
Posts: 162
From: Colonia Lindensium
Joined: 02-29-2004


Message 133 of 135 (140810)
09-07-2004 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by kendemyer
09-05-2004 7:27 PM


Re: to: all
Hi Ken,
Ken writes:
See my last post to you in the "professed atheism" thread.
Sadly, this does not answer my direct questions. Here they are again:
quote:
Questions: How many attendees of the aforementioned conference described it as upbeat (or similar); how many described it as downbeat (or similar); and how many commented on the mood at all?
Also, how many attended the conference?
Cheers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by kendemyer, posted 09-05-2004 7:27 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 134 of 135 (140912)
09-08-2004 9:41 AM
Reply to: Message 129 by jar
09-07-2004 6:07 PM


Re: For the eighth time or so
That conference isn't just upbeat, its practically dissolute.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by jar, posted 09-07-2004 6:07 PM jar has not replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4698 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 135 of 135 (141755)
09-12-2004 12:49 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by kendemyer
09-06-2004 10:29 PM


Re: To: All
Ken,
Ooook! posted this link to a paper on this topic, fascinating stuff and gives good insight into the work being done in abiogenesis at this time if you will read it.
Searching for the common ancestor - PubMed
Because they don't confidently claim to know exactly how it was done and give engineering explanations based on conjecture but stated with the confidence of fact like the Noah's Ark articles you posted you can read it without threat to your beliefs and then happily dismiss the article, but at least you'll have a little better idea about what the biologists are doing.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by kendemyer, posted 09-06-2004 10:29 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024