Lysimachus- Thread via backdoor

Lysimachus seems intend on arguing for the ark of the covenant via the backdoor. Rather than start a thread - he is discussing the matter via threads on various other subjects.The continuation of art styles through a speculated flood

quote:

---

MSG131: You want evidence for the Ark of the Covenant? or Noah's Ark? Like I said, I will not divulge on the AofC now. Perhaps in the future. The above was just a taste. For now and a while, it's Noah's Ark and the flood.

---

quote:

---

MSG124: Willowtree,

​

I will make a Noah's Ark/Flood thread as soon as possible. First, I'm in the process of typing up a lot of information that has not been put on the web that is desperately needed.

​

And about the blood on the Ark...ahhemm...well...let me tell you this Willowtree, that is a touchy subject, and that is why I'm more hesitant to embark upon that subject. Remember, of all the discoveries claimed by W.A.R, the Ark of the Covenant is the ONLY "wait and see" discovery. AND SO ON FOR ABOUT 400 WORDS

---

Giant people in the bible?

quote:

---

MSG130: Anything other than Ron Wyatt's discoveries...there is a high percentage that I could "be had". But regarding Ron's discoveries themselves, I guarantee you 100% that I haven't, as I have been exposed full force to the truths and lies spread to the world regarding them, and am right in the lime light of information. I have personal connections with not only several witnesses, but also contributers and workers themselves involved with W.A.R. Just be patient, and I will take the time to thoroughly provide and document much uncovered information to the public online. Even your questions regarding the Ark of the Covenant and the blood *now that is a touchy subject, and very hard for people to swallow, but once closely investigated, one will realize that the idea is a far cry from being a scam*

---

quote:

---

MSG124: And no need to feel sorry for me folks. I feel sorry that you are incapable of embarking on these discussions more intelligently, as you've all been had that Ron Wyatt is a fraud. Now this I am 100% certain of, as I have the offical governent papers to back up my claims. I'm just waiting for the moment to speil my information.

---

and so on.I would ask that Lysimachus refrains from saying to posters that they change their tune once the evidence turns up and so forth.If he wants has some evidence that he wants to present -present it - I don't want jam tomorrow, I want it today. If the evidence is not in a fit state to present at the moment, don't bring it up.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-22-2004 02:48 PM

I actually agree with this. It's getting old and annoying. I've been noticing the you'll-be-sorry-once-I-have-my-evidence posts, too.

---

The Laminator
B ULLS HITFor goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

Offhand, Lysimachus seems to post in forums/topics not of my personal interest - I don't pay much attention to them. I did do a slight review, but I'm not now about to go back and in depth digest his past messages (which can be found by going here, and entering Lysimachus in the "Search by User Name" field).But Charles' complain seems to be most legitimate.So, Lysimachus, it's time to debate in good faith. Post things to topics they belong in. Back up your assertions with data - If you really don't have anything of substance to say, they don't say anything. If you don't clean up your act, a suspension is probably coming.I guess other members can report subsequent Lysimachus "badness" to this topic. Please don't clutter the topic with irrelivent chatter.Adminnemooseus

Sorry, I don't have time for this stuff now. I don't discuss when other people want, but when I'm ready. That is my rule of thumb. Don't go trying to pull me in a variety of topics to try and dilute the concentration of my upcoming topic. That's a tactic you use to try and overwhelm me with more material I can handle--making it "appear" that I can't substantiate anything. It's much easier to be the "questionaire" rather than the "answerer". All you do is ask questions, but you arn't considerate enough to ask them one at a time.Good night, it's late.