God gave us what we need to survive

God gave people what we need to survive. Many evolutionists argue that fish evolved into humans. How did they have the correct DNA sequences to develop back bones and limbs? A fish certainly does not have any of these things.It is my belief that God gave humans as well as animals what they needed in order to survive. What looks like speciation is actually many recessive genes that have all came out together. To add to this dilemma there are different regions to the world. Naturally people in Africa are going to look different from those in Sweden. God gave humans the ability to adapt. Biological Evolution did not.There have been fossils of humans found in Africa that have been said to have different jaw structures. First African Americans have differently shaped jaws than those of Americans, second as a skull ages the top bone of the jaw actually receeds and last undergoing thousands of years as a fossil the bones of the body undergo major changes caused by the pressure of the earth. {Added blank lines between the paragraphs. alphablu82 had indented them in the raw text form, but indentations do not work in the displayed form of the message. - Adminnemooseus}This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 01-11-2006 01:22 PM

First of all, your first paragraph has pretty glaring errors. While some fish may indeed not have boney spinal columns, many (most?) do. Per "limbs" - I think that the bottom fins found on most to all fish would qualify as limbs. That is true regardless of whatever ancestorial relationship fish may or may not have to humans. This appears to be the key sentence in the second paragraph. Would you like to pursue this specific item as a new topic?The third paragraph is rather muddled. The general theme is human jaw structure. Properly presented, this might also make for a new topic.So, my impression is that in your three paragraphs you have presented a non-topic and two distinct possible topics. But the themes of paragraphs two and three do not belong in the same topic.Please reply in this topic. Let's see if we can get something from your message 1 to work as a new topic.Please do not propose any other new topics until we resolve the content of this one.Adminnemooseus

---

I would like to open up a new topic on how recessive genes may not show up for many years. I have talked with someone getting their Phd in Geology and he says that is a problem faced in paleontology. If this is approved I will elaborate further.

You know, PhD sometimes refers to "Piled higher and Deeper". More seriously, you're going to need to elaborate on this little tidbit further before the topic gets approved and promoted.Please post a new message in this topic, with that eloboration. If and when approved that message can become message 1 of the open to debate topic. We'll also put a suitable topic title on it at that time. Maybe "Later Expression of Recessive Genes" will function as that title.Adminnemooseus

---

Well, despite my posting of the above message, alphablu82 has PNT'ed the superbly titled New topic (yes, that link tag is the proposed title).Not a good way to stay on the happy side of admin-moose.This topic abandoned and closed.AdminnemooseusThis message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 01-12-2006 03:14 PM

---