I see. Once again, a crucial flaw of short-posts is demonstrated: it gives idiots room to move.
If you are going to call me a hatemongering, gibbering, ignorant, and insinuate that I'm a flake; then perhaps you need to justify your comments, you jerk.
As I see it, I simply asked if it would be acceptable to start a discussion, on the stated topic, while following the rules of your forum; but to also have a link to something which does not follow your forum rules, as a reference-background for some of the things I did not desire to repeat ad-nauseam.
I tried to be honest about this. Look, should I have said nothing, and just added the link as my homepage? Would that have not over-burdened your poor little mind?
Gibberish? How dare you? The html started out as a listing of arguments and counter-arguments. As time passed, I kept tinkering with it - hence the highly punctuated, train-of-thought writing style. I am not an author, there is no charge attached to reading it. Simply operating on you get what you pay for: live with it. No one is being violently forced to read anything, smuck-boy.
How dare you state that I am ignorant concerning the subject matter?! Dare I even ask how you reached this conclusion? Via Link-Osmosis, perhaps? Advanced Introduction-Skimming Extrapolation, perhaps? Years of experience of almost-reading? Based on what, exactly?
I would hazard that you found something emotionally offensive at the very start of the HTML, and typical of the breed, translated that into 'ignorance': you and Michael Jackson, man; two of a kind.
Tell me, how old are you? 12? You 'reason' like a pissed-off little child. Grow up.
IMO you would seem to be implying that I'm some kind of unbalanced moron with some kind of crazy, worthless 'manifesto'. Again, if you would actually justify this, I mean rationally, apart from your little bruised heart moaning periodically, that would be nice. Of course, please do not over-strain yourself.
I would understand, perfectly, if you were to call me a foul-mouthed, angry, demented, scum-ball bastard, because I am: I am not under any illusion of what DearSir reads like. Hence my stating that, up front. Get it? (Sigh. Why do I even ask...)
And what is the deal with altering the link? Why not just delete it? In fact, why not just kill the topic itself, and send me a threatening email? What kind of response did you expect of me? Are you looking for that extra little bit of justification to kill the topic? Why wait? I sincerely hope that you are not typical of the admins here: because you are a useless little twit.
R.
(PS: As for being anti-any-religion: dude, are you then pro-NAMBLA? Do you draw any lines, ever, anywhere? Critique of the Religion of Peace is very well documented. I can read. I think certain things are deeply, deeply wrong. Get it? More to the point, I have no intension of posting anything like that HERE. Do I have your permission, O kind sir, to post such things elsewhere? Pretty Please?)
Edited by AChristianDarkly, : No reason given.
Edited by AChristianDarkly, : 0;-)
OCCD...
™ Version 4.2