Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,408 Year: 3,665/9,624 Month: 536/974 Week: 149/276 Day: 23/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Brad Answered another board
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5054 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 1 of 1 (18253)
09-25-2002 11:40 AM


Re: An answer not at my odd genesis for yeC
Posted by Brad McFall on September 26, 2002, 12:15 am , in reply to "A Question for yec"
209.150.249.21
SIMPLE:
The thing is a perversion.
This word was used by Maxwell in his discussion of circularly polarized light and Pasteur was if only dimly aware of something called by him a "grand assymetry" while Morowitz in designing better chemical pedagogy uncovered the term as used by Gibbs who made the spin into an independent development. Cant belive the chimp ask some other chump. While I do not yet know if this word has any claim to Einstein's thought about how it may have been to "ride" a light wave the CONcept *may* be useable to give a better physicall interpretation of "mutation" by showing how x-rays and bodily shape distortion can not be uniquely independent in the sense of Gibbs in the light of Maxwell's equations. I can not even in any fancy imagination think that science can be writ any clearer.
The evidence to establish this as a "mechanism" would re-call an economic bottom line not yet global that FIRST would need to find some convergence of two databases {one on the surface with two indpenedent variables (e and m) and the other in a tube with three (e, m, g)} and then the thinking on the experimental philsophy of the design of the implementation of perversions OUTSIDE making money for insurance companies could begin for this notion not only could if granted show where microevolution can not locate mesoevolution and thus can not bauplan-change no matter the range change thought (but also show ?perhaps? that (was said in Conneticut) some work in bioelectromagnetics but not the c/e illusion IS?? perverted (as was the discussion of Darwin Campfire Chat become)and thus explained, all the while distinguishing any national interest in classification that affect division of litigation involving health effects categorized as ion-izing vs non-ioninizing that may not in the STOP to evolution not exist. Really. YEC IT IS this is no O-K(market) special. Serously. Da d stations. G stands in for gravity and gravitas you known already what the e and m are for. ij=0?
This was from the NO ANSWERS IN GENESIS board.
That is ALL i must SIay. God Bless. get it or get before the kind kind. JJJ ( this was only the "," in the BOOK NOOK)
-----
Added by Adminnemooseus:
This seems to be the board home page:
No Answers in Genesis Discussion Board
This is the opening message (from John Stear), of the topic Brad mentioned:
http://members3.boardhost.com/john666/msg/29482.html
[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 09-25-2002]

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024