Understanding through Discussion

Register | FAQ | Rules | Search | Forums | All Topics

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 322 (6525 total)
Current session began: 09-08-2010 6:04 AM
Page Loaded: 09-08-2010 6:04 AM
33 online now:
Upcoming Birthdays: Bikerman
Post Volume:
Total: 579,934 Year: 38,802/48,637 Month: 2,024/6,636 Week: 658/2,060 Day: 32/202 Hour: 0/2

EvC Forum All Forums Side Orders Coffee House Was the destruction of the twin towers scientifically possible on 9/11
 

Originator Info

lost-apathy

Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 67
From: Scottsdale, Az, USA
Registered: 04-24-2005
Participants (35) No.
Posts
(151)
Member's
Posts
Dr Adequate 21 Dr Adequate Posts Only
lost-apathy 20 lost-apathy Posts Only
molbiogirl 14 molbiogirl Posts Only
randman 12 randman Posts Only
Chiroptera 10 Chiroptera Posts Only
subbie 7 subbie Posts Only
Admin 6 Admin Posts Only
Percy 6 Percy Posts Only
crashfrog 5 crashfrog Posts Only
jar 5 jar Posts Only
Taz 5 Taz Posts Only
Archer Opterix 4 Archer Opterix Posts Only
IamJoseph 3 IamJoseph Posts Only
nator 3 nator Posts Only
riVeRraT 3 riVeRraT Posts Only
Buzsaw 2 Buzsaw Posts Only
Hyroglyphx 2 Hyroglyphx Posts Only
kjsimons 2 kjsimons Posts Only
Rahvin 2 Rahvin Posts Only
rbp 2 rbp Posts Only
teen4christ 2 teen4christ Posts Only
VirtuousGuile 2 VirtuousGuile Posts Only
1071 1 1071 Posts Only
Adminastasia 1 Adminastasia Posts Only
Annafan 1 Annafan Posts Only
AnswersInGenitals 1 AnswersInGenitals Posts Only
Clark 1 Clark Posts Only
DrJones* 1 DrJones* Posts Only
Jaderis 1 Jaderis Posts Only
mark24 1 mark24 Posts Only
Mr Jack 1 Mr Jack Posts Only
Nuggin 1 Nuggin Posts Only
ramoss 1 ramoss Posts Only
Son Goku 1 Son Goku Posts Only
Vacate 1 Vacate Posts Only
Thread Info

Originated:08-18-2007 7:43 PM
Total Participants:35
Total Posts:151

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was the destruction of the twin towers scientifically possible on 9/11
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 533
From: Orlando,FL
Registered: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 3

Message 148 of 151 (432354)
05-29-2008 9:00 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by VirtuousGuile
05-29-2008 6:51 AM


Re: Please offer me an explanation
VG writes:

Now the question that has bugged me is why didn't the subsequent central steel columns on the lower floors, which weren't damaged give way with out seemingly any resistance, or why didn't they seemingly affect the fall of the structure.

The answer is that the floors in the building weren't designed (and no building is) to withstand the dynamic load of the top quarter of the building falling on it. The equation F = ma shows that the force load goes up as acceleration increases (ie the top of the building falling due to gravity ~9.8m/s/s). No other explaination should be needed.

Edited by kjsimons, : Mixed up my physics equations.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by VirtuousGuile, posted 05-29-2008 6:51 AM VirtuousGuile has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Percy, posted 05-29-2008 9:09 AM
 Message 150 by VirtuousGuile, posted 05-29-2008 9:12 AM

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 533
From: Orlando,FL
Registered: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 3

Message 151 of 151 (432357)
05-29-2008 9:22 AM
Reply to: Message 149 by Percy
05-29-2008 9:09 AM


Re: Please offer me an explanation
Sorry, I mixed up my equations, not enough coffee! :)

Kinetic energy K is found by: K = (mv^2)/2.

And the towers had a whole lot of kinetic energy once it started falling


This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Percy, posted 05-29-2008 9:09 AM Percy has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:



[ Home | Forums | All Topics | Site Map | Contact Us ]

Copyright 2001-2010 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 3.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2010