|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,766 Year: 4,023/9,624 Month: 894/974 Week: 221/286 Day: 28/109 Hour: 1/3 |
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution. We Have The Fossils. We Win. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
granpa Member (Idle past 2367 days) Posts: 128 Joined: |
Genesis describes the evolution of man. The rest of the Bible describes the evolution of Jesus.
Why BELIEVE that it will rain today when you can KNOW that it might rain today. Belief is unnecessary and illogical. A moral person is a person that understands that the universe does not revolve around their ego. A civilized society is a society whose laws do not revolve around any one person or group of people.The more a society treats everyone as equals the more civilized it is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5949 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
Stasis is also a fundamental prediction of evolution. The same process that cause change also cause stasis. The variable there is how well adapted the population already is. Think of negative feedback loops as an analogy.
And Darwin did know and state that the rate of evolutionary change would vary. He overemphasized gradualism in response to the saltationists who called for sudden changes, such as a new organ appearing in a single generation. Saltationism is basically just another form of creationism.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 99 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
I wonder which part of Genesis "describes the evolution of man"? Kind of off-topic, though.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 99 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
The bet Darwin never suspected that the superstition of spontaneuos generation would reappear in a different form - Punctuated Equilibrium.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
granpa Member (Idle past 2367 days) Posts: 128 Joined: |
I cant propose a new topic because I cant post in that forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
granpa writes: I cant propose a new topic because I cant post in that forum. I just checked - You didn't have and still don't have any posting restrictions in any forum, including "Proposed New Topics". Adminnemooseus Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Remove stray extra word and further tweak.Or something like that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
granpa Member (Idle past 2367 days) Posts: 128 Joined: |
I quote:
You do not have new topic privileges on this board https://i.imgur.com/6maoa5I.png Edited by granpa, : No reason given.Why BELIEVE that it will rain today when you can KNOW that it might rain today. Belief is unnecessary and illogical. A moral person is a person that understands that the universe does not revolve around their ego. A civilized society is a society whose laws do not revolve around any one person or group of people.The more a society treats everyone as equals the more civilized it is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
Sorry, overlooked something before. Indeed, your profile settings do not permit topic starting.
I'm not now going to change this setting, but I will bring the mater up in the Private Admin Forum. Adminnemooseus Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Posted by wrong (aka non-admin) mode.Or something like that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5949 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
What? You replied with a complete non-sentence?
What? You literally had nothing to say? And your pathetic attempt to tie punctuated equilibrium with SPONTANEOUS GENERATION? Just what kind of krack are you smoking? Here is a bit of advice for you: If you want to oppose evolution, THEN LEARN SOMETHING ABOUT EVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you want to use punctuated equilibrium, THEN LEARN SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! As long as you do nothing but regurgitate stupid creationist lies, you are telling us more unmistakably that you are an idiotic creationist drone incapable of any actual thought. And that their statements are completely and utterly false. And just what is that complete and utter bullshit about "spontaneous generation", which everybody knows has absolutely nothing to do with punctuated equilibria.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 194 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
The bet Darwin never suspected that the superstition of spontaneous generation would reappear in a different form - Punctuated Equilibrium.
Before posting such twaddle you should learn what "spontaneous generation" and "Punctuated Equilibrium" mean. They are not even close to meaning the same thing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 310 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
The bet Darwin never suspected that the superstition of spontaneuos generation would reappear in a different form - Punctuated Equilibrium. The superficial illiteracy of your post only serves to accentuate its deep fundamental stupidity. Why didn't you learn what any of those words meant before putting them together in a post? And why the devil did you puke up this bit of moronic ignorance on this particular thread anyway? Confine yourself to the topic, which is how evolutionists have the fossils and win. Do you have anything to say about that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 310 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
The fossil record reveals the miserable failure of Darwism's most fundamental prediction - gradualism. Gould stated that the fossil record is characterised two things antithetical to gradualism - sudden appearance and stasis. Sudden appearance and stasis fit two fundamental predictions of creation. Ain't that interesting? You lie a lot, don't you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 99 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
I don't know what you mean. Can you elaborate, please?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1431 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
I don't know what you mean. Can you elaborate, please? This statement of yours:
Message 465: The fossil record reveals the miserable failure of Darwism's most fundamental prediction - gradualism. ... Is false: (a) it is not "fundamental" and (b) Darwin also discussed periods of rapid change between periods of little change. This statement of yours:
Message 469:The bet Darwin never suspected that the superstition of spontaneous generation would reappear in a different form - Punctuated Equilibrium. Is false: spontaneous generation has absolutely nothing to do with punctuated equilibrium. These are two examples take from two recent posts of yours, showing a consistent pattern of telling falsehoods. When you repeat falsehoods after being told they are falsehoods, that shows intent to tell falsehoods: lying. Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 310 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
I don't know what you mean. Can you elaborate, please? I mean that you are frequently prone to mendacity, that you have a persistent tendency to untruthfulness, that it is your habit and custom to perpetrate falsehoods, and that you have often been known to fib. Did I stutter?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024