|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The "Circle of the Earth" | |||||||||||||||||||||||
doctrbill Member (Idle past 2786 days) Posts: 1174 From: Eugene, Oregon, USA Joined: |
simple writes: Without form, and void in the created state could mean a lot of things. In English, perhaps. That is why we explore earlier versions.
"It was not in the form it now is, otherwise it must have a form, as all matter has; it was a fluid matter, ..." FYI: 'fluid' is a form of matter.
some simply interpret that it had a different form.. Yes. They do. And how is that "without form?"
we can't look for present environments and try to say that the lack of form at creation was like that! What present environment would you say is "without form?" Theology is the science of Dominion. - - - My God is your god's Boss - - -
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
simple writes: Hey, why not have this Rolls Royce of flying machines, that can travel the expanse of this universe is style?? The question is, "Why would He?" What appurtenances outside of God could possibly make His travel "in style"? How could anything aside from God be relevant?
While visiting earth.... Again, a very belittling picture of God, suggesting He isn't here all the time.
Either way the verse is wonderfully bang on. As somebody has already mentioned, the horizon is always seen as a circle. The ancient writers would have recognized that the higher you get, say on a mountain top, the bigger that circle is. The verse implies that God is higher than any mountain top, higher than man can ever get. Your "orbit" brings Him down to a height that man can attain. The verse is "bang on" enough already without a lot of science-fiction claptrap embellishments. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
The whirlwind from heaven was not DNA. That simply does not fit the bill. You're right. That would be silly. In many respects, the Bible was the world's first Wikipedia article. -- Doug Brown (quoted by Carlin Romano in The Chronicle Review)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
quote:Doesn't matter from the Hebrew, it is still unknown, really how it was meant, precisely. quote:True, so the bible commentary you quoted feels there was matter here. So?? Something wrong with matter? quote:Well, one supposes that, according to their take, the translation should be read a bit like 'without present form'! Or, perhaps, without after creation week form' etc. Simple. quote:Now that He already done formed the earth, how is it you would expect to find parts of it still unformed?? One might grab for some features of this already formed earth, to try and get some rough comparison. I might grab at the La Brea tar pits, but that is so rough, it isn't meant to really nail the pre formed earth, where the waters were not yet separated from the land.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
Thank you. One must try to see things in the perspective they were framed. DNA is not something of the size, and ability to come in from the heavens, accompanied by angels, carrying the Ancient of Days, and His sapphire throne. That is elementary.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
quote:It is inter dimensional, and comfy, and the angels that like to tag along are accommodated? quote:Why would He hang out on this sinful speck all the time?? He will move here forever when the new heavens come, but, even then, I guess He likes to boggie around. This will just be the HQ. The central command. The universe hub. If you mean that His spirit is in all, and all that sort of thing, yes. In that sense, He is always here. If we mean the God body, why, how else could He have a circuit of the expanse of the heavens, if He always stayed put?? quote:They could NOT attain an orbit then. They had to hustle to try and build a tower to the heavens, in the time of Babel. In the time of the major prophets, they still had no rockets, or even planes, if you recall! So, of note would be a ship that did just that. Besides, man could not BEGIN to go where the mobile sapphire throne of God can. We barely got to the moon. No biblical need at all to limit God, or His throne, and call what was described an embellishment. Man's limited imagination needs some embellishment, having been tied down for so long by the boring limits of poor little science.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1365 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Eze 1:15 Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces. 16 The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel. 26 And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it. 27 And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about. 28 As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. please read the entire chapter. in fact, read revelation while you're at it. if i, mister "overliteral," am inclined to say any books are pretty strictly metaphor, it's these two. and the vast majority of jewish commentary agrees. in any case, god's throne is not "a flying saucer" or even one of ezekiel's "wheels within wheels." if you read the description, there are four such wheels, as well as four drivers, forming the basis of god's chariot. the whole contraption is called the merkabah. in no way is it circular.
But, if one was to ride on the thing, one would see the people as little bugs in size. One also could maintain an orbit. this is missing the entire point of the verse. god does not see men as grasshoppers because he drives a UFO. he sees men as grasshoppers because he is all powerful. the height issue, having god be above earth, is secondary to that meaning of the verse -- you are attempting to rob the verse of its meaning and belittle god, just to stick him in a UFO.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
simple writes: In the time of the major prophets, they still had no rockets, or even planes, if you recall! Irrelevant. People reading the text today would put God in the So What category if He was in a mere orbit. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
Is anyone else reminded of that scene in The Life of Brian?
In many respects, the Bible was the world's first Wikipedia article. -- Doug Brown (quoted by Carlin Romano in The Chronicle Review)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1365 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
I am inclined to agree in terms of what the author had in mind but have not yet found a translator willing to publish the text in that way. Are you aware of one who has? no, i'm not. but this is why one who really wants to understand the bible better tends to learn at least one of the languages it was written in. even the most idiomatic translations don't butcher dualisms like that -- so the concept is simply lost across translations.
Even though I understand that the author may have intended to describe all of existence, it remains clear to me that his conception of "everything" was extremely limited. I stand by my earlier assertion that the biblical word 'earth,' never suggests a planetary concept; and now add, for the purpose of clarification, that it also never suggests a global concept as we understand the literal meaning of that word. Even biblical expressions such as "whole earth," "all the earth," and "all the world," may be demonstrated, in context, to depict relatively small areas of the globe. i think we're speaking past each other. the authors did fully intend to describe everything, all land, but their concept thereof probably didn't extend far past egypt in on direction and turkey in the other. and their concept certainly wasn't shaped like a globe. and that's sort of what we're talking about in this thread -- their concept of the "planet" as a flat, circular area.
This is simply a modernization of Philo's cockamamie something/nothing fantasy. any reading that invokes quantum mechanics is probably flawed.
I understand the temptation to view it in that way but in context it seems laughable. i.e. "When God created the earth, the earth did not exist, and was covered with water." I do no mean to make fun of the text but rather of the interpretation. err, no, more like "when god began creating everything, the earth did not exist." don't forget the very first word of genesis, b'reishit.
Assuming, as many do, that the first two verses are an introductory summation of the cosmogony, then there is no serious obstacle to the interpretation which I have offered. {Note that the text does not actually say that "earth" is under the water at this point.} In addition to other advantages offered by said interpretation is its consistency with subsequent descriptions of Earth as "dry land" and a place where there is "no rain." don't mix up the two stories. it'll only confuse the issues. genesis 2 is a completely separate tradition. and the text doesn't say the land the was under the water, but it heavily implies it: when the water is collected into specific places, dry land first appears. before that point, the only logical reading is that land was under the water, or part of the water.
Lending some strength to my argument regarding interpretation of tohu-bohu is the Septuagint reading of Genesis 1:2 which says: earth was unsightly and unfurnished. Sir Brenton's translation. that's a rather traditional understanding, yes.
The other challenge I see here is to explain why we imagine a water covered earth beneath the surface of which is that which God will call "Earth," defined in terms of its dryness; and then He defines "Sea" as the water in which Earth has appeared. the sea, like darkness before light, exists without land, but is merely defined by the contrast. the land, on the other hand, does not. i think the best reading is that the land had not separated from the water -- it needs to be dry before it's called "land." i think then the best description is that it did not exist.
This presents a fundamental challenge to creationist interpreters. The Bible, even the New Testament, is clear regarding the cosmological concept being presented here. Clearly, it is not one with which modern students are intimately familiar. It is not even remotely conceivable as a "global" view, in terms of solid geometry. I am thinking of how Saint Peter describes Earth as being partly in and partly out of the water. well, yes, but we can talk about their idea of the cosmos as a whole. which is what i think genesis 1 is doing, and what the verse in question in this thread is doing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
quote:Why, what might I find in those readings of relevance? quote:So a wheel can't be circular? What were they, in your opinion, square?? Reinventing the wheel, here, much?? quote:That is your opinion, that the REASON we are referred to as little bugs, is because of some highfalutin reason other than we were way down there. I mean, I see men as bugs in a plane, does that mean I am all powerful??? Therefore it is not I attempting to belittle God in any way. In fact, where is it, precisely you put Him, IF ANYWHERE!!!???
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
False. Today, we are not escorted by what was it, four angels with wheels of their own! neither do we appear like the Almighty, and ride in a sapphire throne. Nothing ho hum at all about that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1365 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Why, what might I find in those readings of relevance? the common theme of four animals.
So a wheel can't be circular? What were they, in your opinion, square?? Reinventing the wheel, here, much?? no. wheels are round. your car has four wheels. it must be a circle, right?
That is your opinion, that the REASON we are referred to as little bugs, is because of some highfalutin reason other than we were way down there. um, yes. the bible is a religious text. it talks about the majesty and power of god in many places, such as this. making god into a measly space alien zipping about in his UFO kind of takes away from that.
I mean, I see men as bugs in a plane, does that mean I am all powerful??? i challenge you to make out individual human forms from 30,000 feet. and you've still got the horse planted firmly behind the cart. the text is about the all-powerful nature of god. look at the VERY NEXT VERSE
quote: that god looks down on man from the heavens and sees everything is one aspect of his almightly power. it's not about god zipping around in a flying saucer. it's about the power of god.
Therefore it is not I attempting to belittle God in any way. In fact, where is it, precisely you put Him, IF ANYWHERE!!!??? the verse puts him in heaven.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
simple  Inactive Member |
quote: Well, if these things flew with the Ancient of days, that means they reallyget around. That would be about as surprising as seeing some secret service folks around the president of the USA.
quote:""Ezekiel saw a wheel, way up in the middle of the air; the big wheel ran by faith and the little wheel ran by the grace of God, a wheel in a wheel, away in the middle of the air.") Ezekiel saw that these wheels were turning, one wheel within the other. As he watched he also saw a firmament above, shining in splendor, and above the firmament, as he lifted his eyes higher, he saw a throne. And on the throne sat a man." http://pbc.org/library/files/html/0226.html Most people I have heard speak about this think of it as wheels within wheels. I suppose you could imagine a car shape if you wish, though I have no need to stick a pope mobile on the wheels, myself.
quote:I disagree. Him tripping around this and all universes in a sapphire throne, in a God body, I think is better than just some ethereal, no name, eunuchized, impersonal, concept of Him. quote:I challenge you to prove that it was 30,000 feet! And to prove that God can't see a lot better than us as well!!! quote: I can say, 'there goes Anachophilia, riding in a VW, painted orange, with four inflatable dummies in the car as well'. Then I could go on to say, 'That guy spent years in school, and was an important professor at one time' The last bit does not mean I could not also note the vehicle.
quote: He can look down from a lot higher up, and does, and can see everything. But that doesn't mean He also can't come down to earth in His flying wheels at leisure. Heaven is a big place. God is more than just the Father as well!
quote:But I never asked where you thought that verse put Him, or what part of heaven. I asked you where YOU thought He was. I did that, since you accused me of belittling Him. I was digging, to find out if you even believed in Him at all! If not, of course, who is belittling what here!!??
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
simple writes: neither do we appear like the Almighty, and ride in a sapphire throne. Shackling God to any material contrivance is utterly demeaning. “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024