Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The "Circle of the Earth"
doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2786 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 106 of 307 (426703)
10-08-2007 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by simple
10-08-2007 1:39 AM


Re: The circle of the earth
simple writes:
Without form, and void in the created state could mean a lot of things.
In English, perhaps. That is why we explore earlier versions.
"It was not in the form it now is, otherwise it must have a form, as all matter has; it was a fluid matter, ..."
FYI: 'fluid' is a form of matter.
some simply interpret that it had a different form..
Yes. They do. And how is that "without form?"
we can't look for present environments and try to say that the lack of form at creation was like that!
What present environment would you say is "without form?"

Theology is the science of Dominion.
- - - My God is your god's Boss - - -

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 1:39 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 3:41 PM doctrbill has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 107 of 307 (426704)
10-08-2007 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by simple
10-08-2007 1:39 PM


simple writes:
Hey, why not have this Rolls Royce of flying machines, that can travel the expanse of this universe is style??
The question is, "Why would He?" What appurtenances outside of God could possibly make His travel "in style"? How could anything aside from God be relevant?
While visiting earth....
Again, a very belittling picture of God, suggesting He isn't here all the time.
Either way the verse is wonderfully bang on.
As somebody has already mentioned, the horizon is always seen as a circle. The ancient writers would have recognized that the higher you get, say on a mountain top, the bigger that circle is. The verse implies that God is higher than any mountain top, higher than man can ever get.
Your "orbit" brings Him down to a height that man can attain.
The verse is "bang on" enough already without a lot of science-fiction claptrap embellishments.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 1:39 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 3:53 PM ringo has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 307 (426715)
10-08-2007 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by simple
10-08-2007 12:59 PM


Heh.
The whirlwind from heaven was not DNA. That simply does not fit the bill.
You're right. That would be silly.

In many respects, the Bible was the world's first Wikipedia article. -- Doug Brown (quoted by Carlin Romano in The Chronicle Review)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 12:59 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 3:43 PM Chiroptera has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 109 of 307 (426716)
10-08-2007 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by doctrbill
10-08-2007 2:01 PM


Re: The circle of the earth
quote:
In English, perhaps. That is why we explore earlier versions.
Doesn't matter from the Hebrew, it is still unknown, really how it was meant, precisely.
quote:
FYI: 'fluid' is a form of matter.
True, so the bible commentary you quoted feels there was matter here. So?? Something wrong with matter?
quote:
Yes. They do. And how is that "without form?"
Well, one supposes that, according to their take, the translation should be read a bit like 'without present form'! Or, perhaps, without after creation week form' etc. Simple.
quote:
What present environment would you say is "without form?"
Now that He already done formed the earth, how is it you would expect to find parts of it still unformed??
One might grab for some features of this already formed earth, to try and get some rough comparison. I might grab at the La Brea tar pits, but that is so rough, it isn't meant to really nail the pre formed earth, where the waters were not yet separated from the land.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by doctrbill, posted 10-08-2007 2:01 PM doctrbill has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 307 (426717)
10-08-2007 3:43 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Chiroptera
10-08-2007 3:31 PM


Re: Heh.
Thank you. One must try to see things in the perspective they were framed. DNA is not something of the size, and ability to come in from the heavens, accompanied by angels, carrying the Ancient of Days, and His sapphire throne. That is elementary.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Chiroptera, posted 10-08-2007 3:31 PM Chiroptera has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 111 of 307 (426719)
10-08-2007 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by ringo
10-08-2007 2:05 PM


quote:
The question is, "Why would He?" What appurtenances outside of God could possibly make His travel "in style"? How could anything aside from God be relevant?
It is inter dimensional, and comfy, and the angels that like to tag along are accommodated?
quote:
Again, a very belittling picture of God, suggesting He isn't here all the time.
Why would He hang out on this sinful speck all the time?? He will move here forever when the new heavens come, but, even then, I guess He likes to boggie around. This will just be the HQ. The central command. The universe hub.
If you mean that His spirit is in all, and all that sort of thing, yes. In that sense, He is always here. If we mean the God body, why, how else could He have a circuit of the expanse of the heavens, if He always stayed put??
quote:
As somebody has already mentioned, the horizon is always seen as a circle. The ancient writers would have recognized that the higher you get, say on a mountain top, the bigger that circle is. The verse implies that God is higher than any mountain top, higher than man can ever get.
Your "orbit" brings Him down to a height that man can attain.
They could NOT attain an orbit then. They had to hustle to try and build a tower to the heavens, in the time of Babel. In the time of the major prophets, they still had no rockets, or even planes, if you recall!
So, of note would be a ship that did just that. Besides, man could not BEGIN to go where the mobile sapphire throne of God can. We barely got to the moon.
No biblical need at all to limit God, or His throne, and call what was described an embellishment. Man's limited imagination needs some embellishment, having been tied down for so long by the boring limits of poor little science.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by ringo, posted 10-08-2007 2:05 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by ringo, posted 10-08-2007 4:42 PM simple has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 112 of 307 (426737)
10-08-2007 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by simple
10-08-2007 12:28 PM


Re: The circle of the earth
Eze 1:15 Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces. 16 The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.
26 And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it. 27 And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about. 28 As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD.
please read the entire chapter. in fact, read revelation while you're at it. if i, mister "overliteral," am inclined to say any books are pretty strictly metaphor, it's these two. and the vast majority of jewish commentary agrees.
in any case, god's throne is not "a flying saucer" or even one of ezekiel's "wheels within wheels." if you read the description, there are four such wheels, as well as four drivers, forming the basis of god's chariot. the whole contraption is called the merkabah.
in no way is it circular.
But, if one was to ride on the thing, one would see the people as little bugs in size. One also could maintain an orbit.
this is missing the entire point of the verse. god does not see men as grasshoppers because he drives a UFO. he sees men as grasshoppers because he is all powerful. the height issue, having god be above earth, is secondary to that meaning of the verse -- you are attempting to rob the verse of its meaning and belittle god, just to stick him in a UFO.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 12:28 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 5:05 PM arachnophilia has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 113 of 307 (426738)
10-08-2007 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by simple
10-08-2007 3:53 PM


simple writes:
In the time of the major prophets, they still had no rockets, or even planes, if you recall!
Irrelevant. People reading the text today would put God in the So What category if He was in a mere orbit.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 3:53 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 5:08 PM ringo has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 307 (426748)
10-08-2007 4:57 PM


God in a flying saucer.
Is anyone else reminded of that scene in The Life of Brian?

In many respects, the Bible was the world's first Wikipedia article. -- Doug Brown (quoted by Carlin Romano in The Chronicle Review)

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by doctrbill, posted 10-08-2007 8:30 PM Chiroptera has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 115 of 307 (426751)
10-08-2007 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by doctrbill
10-08-2007 1:33 PM


Re: The circle of the earth
I am inclined to agree in terms of what the author had in mind but have not yet found a translator willing to publish the text in that way. Are you aware of one who has?
no, i'm not. but this is why one who really wants to understand the bible better tends to learn at least one of the languages it was written in. even the most idiomatic translations don't butcher dualisms like that -- so the concept is simply lost across translations.
Even though I understand that the author may have intended to describe all of existence, it remains clear to me that his conception of "everything" was extremely limited. I stand by my earlier assertion that the biblical word 'earth,' never suggests a planetary concept; and now add, for the purpose of clarification, that it also never suggests a global concept as we understand the literal meaning of that word. Even biblical expressions such as "whole earth," "all the earth," and "all the world," may be demonstrated, in context, to depict relatively small areas of the globe.
i think we're speaking past each other. the authors did fully intend to describe everything, all land, but their concept thereof probably didn't extend far past egypt in on direction and turkey in the other. and their concept certainly wasn't shaped like a globe. and that's sort of what we're talking about in this thread -- their concept of the "planet" as a flat, circular area.
This is simply a modernization of Philo's cockamamie something/nothing fantasy.
any reading that invokes quantum mechanics is probably flawed.
I understand the temptation to view it in that way but in context it seems laughable. i.e. "When God created the earth, the earth did not exist, and was covered with water." I do no mean to make fun of the text but rather of the interpretation.
err, no, more like "when god began creating everything, the earth did not exist." don't forget the very first word of genesis, b'reishit.
Assuming, as many do, that the first two verses are an introductory summation of the cosmogony, then there is no serious obstacle to the interpretation which I have offered. {Note that the text does not actually say that "earth" is under the water at this point.} In addition to other advantages offered by said interpretation is its consistency with subsequent descriptions of Earth as "dry land" and a place where there is "no rain."
don't mix up the two stories. it'll only confuse the issues. genesis 2 is a completely separate tradition. and the text doesn't say the land the was under the water, but it heavily implies it: when the water is collected into specific places, dry land first appears. before that point, the only logical reading is that land was under the water, or part of the water.
Lending some strength to my argument regarding interpretation of tohu-bohu is the Septuagint reading of Genesis 1:2 which says: earth was unsightly and unfurnished. Sir Brenton's translation.
that's a rather traditional understanding, yes.
The other challenge I see here is to explain why we imagine a water covered earth beneath the surface of which is that which God will call "Earth," defined in terms of its dryness; and then He defines "Sea" as the water in which Earth has appeared.
the sea, like darkness before light, exists without land, but is merely defined by the contrast. the land, on the other hand, does not. i think the best reading is that the land had not separated from the water -- it needs to be dry before it's called "land." i think then the best description is that it did not exist.
This presents a fundamental challenge to creationist interpreters. The Bible, even the New Testament, is clear regarding the cosmological concept being presented here. Clearly, it is not one with which modern students are intimately familiar. It is not even remotely conceivable as a "global" view, in terms of solid geometry. I am thinking of how Saint Peter describes Earth as being partly in and partly out of the water.
well, yes, but we can talk about their idea of the cosmos as a whole. which is what i think genesis 1 is doing, and what the verse in question in this thread is doing.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by doctrbill, posted 10-08-2007 1:33 PM doctrbill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by doctrbill, posted 10-08-2007 8:22 PM arachnophilia has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 116 of 307 (426756)
10-08-2007 5:05 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by arachnophilia
10-08-2007 4:39 PM


Re: The circle of the earth
quote:
please read the entire chapter. in fact, read revelation while you're at it. if i, mister "overliteral," am inclined to say any books are pretty strictly metaphor, it's these two. and the vast majority of jewish commentary agrees.
Why, what might I find in those readings of relevance?
quote:
in any case, god's throne is not "a flying saucer" or even one of ezekiel's "wheels within wheels." if you read the description, there are four such wheels, as well as four drivers, forming the basis of god's chariot. the whole contraption is called the merkabah.
in no way is it circular.
So a wheel can't be circular? What were they, in your opinion, square?? Reinventing the wheel, here, much??
quote:
this is missing the entire point of the verse. god does not see men as grasshoppers because he drives a UFO. he sees men as grasshoppers because he is all powerful. the height issue, having god be above earth, is secondary to that meaning of the verse -- you are attempting to rob the verse of its meaning and belittle god, just to stick him in a UFO.
That is your opinion, that the REASON we are referred to as little bugs, is because of some highfalutin reason other than we were way down there. I mean, I see men as bugs in a plane, does that mean I am all powerful??? Therefore it is not I attempting to belittle God in any way. In fact, where is it, precisely you put Him, IF ANYWHERE!!!???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by arachnophilia, posted 10-08-2007 4:39 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by arachnophilia, posted 10-08-2007 5:18 PM simple has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 117 of 307 (426758)
10-08-2007 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by ringo
10-08-2007 4:42 PM


False. Today, we are not escorted by what was it, four angels with wheels of their own! neither do we appear like the Almighty, and ride in a sapphire throne. Nothing ho hum at all about that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by ringo, posted 10-08-2007 4:42 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by ringo, posted 10-08-2007 6:12 PM simple has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 118 of 307 (426761)
10-08-2007 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by simple
10-08-2007 5:05 PM


Re: The circle of the earth
Why, what might I find in those readings of relevance?
the common theme of four animals.
So a wheel can't be circular? What were they, in your opinion, square?? Reinventing the wheel, here, much??
no. wheels are round. your car has four wheels. it must be a circle, right?
That is your opinion, that the REASON we are referred to as little bugs, is because of some highfalutin reason other than we were way down there.
um, yes. the bible is a religious text. it talks about the majesty and power of god in many places, such as this. making god into a measly space alien zipping about in his UFO kind of takes away from that.
I mean, I see men as bugs in a plane, does that mean I am all powerful???
i challenge you to make out individual human forms from 30,000 feet.
and you've still got the horse planted firmly behind the cart. the text is about the all-powerful nature of god. look at the VERY NEXT VERSE
quote:
Isa 40:23 That bringeth the princes to nothing; he maketh the judges of the earth as vanity.
that god looks down on man from the heavens and sees everything is one aspect of his almightly power. it's not about god zipping around in a flying saucer. it's about the power of god.
Therefore it is not I attempting to belittle God in any way. In fact, where is it, precisely you put Him, IF ANYWHERE!!!???
the verse puts him in heaven.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 5:05 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 5:46 PM arachnophilia has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 307 (426772)
10-08-2007 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by arachnophilia
10-08-2007 5:18 PM


Re: The circle of the earth
quote:
the common theme of four animals.
Well, if these things flew with the Ancient of days, that means they reallyget around. That would be about as surprising as seeing some secret service folks around the president of the USA.
quote:
no. wheels are round. your car has four wheels. it must be a circle, right?
""Ezekiel saw a wheel, way up in the middle of the air; the big wheel ran by faith and the little wheel ran by the grace of God, a wheel in a wheel, away in the middle of the air.") Ezekiel saw that these wheels were turning, one wheel within the other. As he watched he also saw a firmament above, shining in splendor, and above the firmament, as he lifted his eyes higher, he saw a throne. And on the throne sat a man."
http://pbc.org/library/files/html/0226.html
Most people I have heard speak about this think of it as wheels within wheels. I suppose you could imagine a car shape if you wish, though I have no need to stick a pope mobile on the wheels, myself.
quote:
um, yes. the bible is a religious text. it talks about the majesty and power of god in many places, such as this. making god into a measly space alien zipping about in his UFO kind of takes away from that.
I disagree. Him tripping around this and all universes in a sapphire throne, in a God body, I think is better than just some ethereal, no name, eunuchized, impersonal, concept of Him.
quote:
i challenge you to make out individual human forms from 30,000 feet.
I challenge you to prove that it was 30,000 feet! And to prove that God can't see a lot better than us as well!!!
quote:
and you've still got the horse planted firmly behind the cart. the text is about the all-powerful nature of god. look at the VERY NEXT VERSE
quote:Isa 40:23 That bringeth the princes to nothing; he maketh the judges of the earth as vanity.
I can say, 'there goes Anachophilia, riding in a VW, painted orange, with four inflatable dummies in the car as well'. Then I could go on to say, 'That guy spent years in school, and was an important professor at one time'
The last bit does not mean I could not also note the vehicle.
quote:
that god looks down on man from the heavens and sees everything is one aspect of his almightly power. it's not about god zipping around in a flying saucer. it's about the power of god.
He can look down from a lot higher up, and does, and can see everything. But that doesn't mean He also can't come down to earth in His flying wheels at leisure. Heaven is a big place. God is more than just the Father as well!
quote:
Therefore it is not I attempting to belittle God in any way. In fact, where is it, precisely you put Him, IF ANYWHERE!!!???
the verse puts him in heaven.
But I never asked where you thought that verse put Him, or what part of heaven. I asked you where YOU thought He was. I did that, since you accused me of belittling Him. I was digging, to find out if you even believed in Him at all! If not, of course, who is belittling what here!!??

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by arachnophilia, posted 10-08-2007 5:18 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by arachnophilia, posted 10-08-2007 11:26 PM simple has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 120 of 307 (426776)
10-08-2007 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by simple
10-08-2007 5:08 PM


simple writes:
neither do we appear like the Almighty, and ride in a sapphire throne.
Shackling God to any material contrivance is utterly demeaning.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by simple, posted 10-08-2007 5:08 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by jar, posted 10-08-2007 6:16 PM ringo has not replied
 Message 128 by simple, posted 10-09-2007 3:11 AM ringo has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024