Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Childhood Vaccinations – Necessary or Overkill? Sequal Thread
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 91 of 308 (428251)
10-15-2007 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by purpledawn
10-15-2007 4:24 PM


Re: I'd love a response to this
quote:
I'm not an evolution expert.
Neither am I.
You have, however, been hanging around here for something close to three and a half years, and you say you aren't a Creationist, so I thought it reasonable to figure that you would have learned the basics of the theory by now.
I apologize for presuming such a thing.
Now that you have the answer to your question, though, how do you think it affects the argument against vaccination?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by purpledawn, posted 10-15-2007 4:24 PM purpledawn has not replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 92 of 308 (428252)
10-15-2007 5:35 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by purpledawn
10-15-2007 4:24 PM


Re: I'd love a response to this
purpledawn writes:
I guess next time I'll just keep my ignorant questions to myself and assume I'm right.
Interpreting this as an expression of frustration, I do think you're getting insufficient recognition of your desire to objectively approach these issues, It may be because those of us on the other side of the issue have had our hackles raised by LindaLou's repetitive, passive-aggressive, conspiracy-laden, ad hominem approach to discussion, and you're maybe catching some of the backwash.
To the other participants in this thread: maybe we can take a step back and be more constructive as the discussion moves on. While I don't agree with PD's position, it does seem to me that she's been pretty fair and balanced with us.
As long as I've already mentioned LindaLou, I may as well continue talking behind her back. Taking the story she gave us at face value, I wonder if her incredibly negative experience at the hands of traditional medicine might have been in any way driven by her rigidity and inability to consider possibilities outside a narrow range. Doctors might have found her an incredibly difficult partner with whom to work with in developing effective approaches.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by purpledawn, posted 10-15-2007 4:24 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 5:47 PM Percy has not replied
 Message 118 by purpledawn, posted 10-16-2007 6:47 AM Percy has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5522 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 93 of 308 (428254)
10-15-2007 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by molbiogirl
10-12-2007 1:32 AM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
mbg writes:
Buz is most emphatically wrong. There is no link between autism and vaccinations.
I know, you're gonna call this "anecdotal" evidence and dismiss it. But what can you say about this claimed connection between autism and vaccinations. That link is not the only one, and it may have been cited before on this thread; I haven't checked.
If you want to go get vaccinated for the flu or whatever, go ahead. But I won't. I won't even get vaccinated for the bird flu when flies in makes big $$$ for Big Pharm. But go ahead and let the med-pharm complex screw around with your immune system if you want to. Good luck and good health.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by molbiogirl, posted 10-12-2007 1:32 AM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Wounded King, posted 10-15-2007 5:56 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 96 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 5:58 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 98 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 6:42 PM Fosdick has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 94 of 308 (428255)
10-15-2007 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Percy
10-15-2007 5:35 PM


Re: I'd love a response to this
quote:
To the other participants in this thread: maybe we can take a step back and be more constructive as the discussion moves on. While I don't agree with PD's position, it does seem to me that she's been pretty fair and balanced with us.
On the one hand, yes, but on the other, no.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Percy, posted 10-15-2007 5:35 PM Percy has not replied

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 95 of 308 (428259)
10-15-2007 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Fosdick
10-15-2007 5:45 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
I'd say there is a whole lot of claim and no way of judging its credibility. There are many very technical assertions and without knowing where they come from, i.e. what research they are based on, it is very hard to evaluate their worth.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Fosdick, posted 10-15-2007 5:45 PM Fosdick has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 6:45 PM Wounded King has not replied
 Message 100 by Buzsaw, posted 10-15-2007 7:52 PM Wounded King has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 96 of 308 (428260)
10-15-2007 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Fosdick
10-15-2007 5:45 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
quote:
I know, you're gonna call this "anecdotal" evidence and dismiss it. But what can you say about this claimed connection between autism and vaccinations. That link is not the only one, and it may have been cited before on this thread; I haven't checked.
The article doesn't reference any peer-reviewed science, so there's no way to check up on the the claims.
Anecdotal evidence of this sort is dismissed becasue it is worthless. At best, it can be a spur to doing real research. That real research has been done, and no link has been found.
quote:
If you want to go get vaccinated for the flu or whatever, go ahead. But I won't. I won't even get vaccinated for the bird flu when flies in makes big $$$ for Big Pharm. But go ahead and let the med-pharm complex screw around with your immune system if you want to. Good luck and good health.
If terrorists detonated a dirty bomb that started a smallpox epidemic, would you rather get the vaccine, which involves some risk, or risk getting this disease?:
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Fosdick, posted 10-15-2007 5:45 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Fosdick, posted 10-16-2007 10:44 AM nator has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 97 of 308 (428268)
10-15-2007 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by purpledawn
10-15-2007 2:16 PM


Re: Genetic Susceptibility
As I understand it the above vaccine can be used on infants if necessary.
When was the last time you heard of a Hep B vaccine shortage?
Flu vaccine, yes. Hep B?
C'mon, PD.
I don't think you can say with 100% certainty that no newborn or infant will ever be given a thimerosal-containing vaccine as long as thimerosal-containing vaccines are still available.
I also can't say with 100% accuracy that I know why gravity exists. (Noone knows.) But I don't spend my time worrying about it.
Look. PD.
It is a fact (as best as science can determine a fact) that thimerosal does NOT cause autism.
It is also a fact that there is no thimerosal in the vaccines given to newborns.
Therefore, genetic susceptibility is not an issue.
The diagnosis rate of autism has remained steady (or slightly increased) since the removal of thimerosal from vaccines.
No thimerosal = steady rate of autism diagnoses.
Are you suggesting that a Hep B shortage is responsible for this?
Edited by molbiogirl, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by purpledawn, posted 10-15-2007 2:16 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by purpledawn, posted 10-16-2007 6:26 AM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 98 of 308 (428270)
10-15-2007 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Fosdick
10-15-2007 5:45 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
In 1978, I learned as a resident at Boston Floating Hospital that the incidence of autism was one in 10,000 children. Over the last ten years I have watched the incidence of autism skyrocket to 1/300-1/600 children.
Two things.
One. Thimerosal has been in vaccines since 1928.
Two. The rate of autism disgnosis has risen dramatically since it was recognized in 1943.
Why didn't autism rates skyrocket between 1943 and 1978 (the site you linked to said 1/10,000 in 1978 and 1/700 now)?
I will give you my best answer:
It wasn't until the late 1960s when autism was defined as separate from "infantile schizophrenia".
The rate of diagnosis started to go up.
And the rate has continued to climb ever since.
And, yes, you're right.
The site you linked to is entirely anecdotal.
Look. I played with mercury in my dad's dental lab when I was a kid.
As a grad student, I have a 4.0 and got my undergraduates degrees (all 3 of them) magna cum laude.
So that's one anecdote for and one against.
Anecdotal info is worse than useless.
In the case of vaccines, it's dangerous. And deadly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Fosdick, posted 10-15-2007 5:45 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2007 7:58 PM molbiogirl has not replied
 Message 103 by Buzsaw, posted 10-15-2007 8:14 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 132 by Fosdick, posted 10-16-2007 11:09 AM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 99 of 308 (428271)
10-15-2007 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Wounded King
10-15-2007 5:56 PM


Just FYI
I downloaded a 215 page document from the NIH and posted a lot of the technical info earlier.
Message 67
You can take a gander at the nitty gritty if you'd like:
The page you’re looking for isn’t available | NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Wounded King, posted 10-15-2007 5:56 PM Wounded King has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 100 of 308 (428278)
10-15-2007 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Wounded King
10-15-2007 5:56 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
WK writes:
I'd say there is a whole lot of claim and no way of judging its credibility. There are many very technical assertions and without knowing where they come from, i.e. what research they are based on, it is very hard to evaluate their worth.
The data given such as what Hoot cited should in itself be sufficient enough to back off from pumping multiple questionable chemicals into babies at a crucial stage of development, especially when you apply the logic to the stats which implicate vaccinations with autism.
When these babies are administered chemicals foreign to the natural body ecosystem, crucial vitamins and other nutrients are diminished which must go to work combating these chemicals. It just doesn't make logical science sense.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Wounded King, posted 10-15-2007 5:56 PM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by nator, posted 10-16-2007 9:40 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Damouse
Member (Idle past 4927 days)
Posts: 215
From: Brookfield, Wisconsin
Joined: 12-18-2005


Message 101 of 308 (428279)
10-15-2007 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by molbiogirl
10-15-2007 6:42 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
Look. I played with mercury in my dad's dental lab when I was a kid.
As a grad student, I have a 4.0 and got my undergraduates degrees (all 3 of them) magna cum laude.
you got really, really lucky? or were really, really careful?

This statement is false.
Yeah so i lurk more than i post, thats why my posts are so low for two year's worth of membership. So sue me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 6:42 PM molbiogirl has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by jar, posted 10-15-2007 8:04 PM Damouse has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 102 of 308 (428280)
10-15-2007 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Damouse
10-15-2007 7:58 PM


Playing with mercury
Growing up mercury was a favorite play toy. Everyone loved it and almost everybody had some. We would rub pennies in it and drop it on the floor then work the drops back together again, squeeze it between our fingers, just generally have fun with it.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2007 7:58 PM Damouse has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Buzsaw, posted 10-15-2007 8:24 PM jar has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 308 (428283)
10-15-2007 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by molbiogirl
10-15-2007 6:42 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
mobiogirl writes:
One. Thimerosal has been in vaccines since 1928.
Two. The rate of autism disgnosis has risen dramatically since it was recognized in 1943.
Why didn't autism rates skyrocket between 1943 and 1978 (the site you linked to said 1/10,000 in 1978 and 1/700 now)?
It would depend on how many shots were administered per capita in the years beginning 1928 all the way until the present, at what ages the shots were administered, when did they begin shooting multiple shots into 18 month children etc, etc. My understanding is that the incidence of autism began to spike up relative to the increase in vaccinating, especially with young children. My understanding is that there has been a steady rise in the numbers of new vaccinations administered which are likely several dozen by the time they're in kindegarten.
The more the pharm fatcats can invent to pump into the kiddies the more the $$$ for them, the researchers and the docs who administer them which imo is the bottom line. The $$$ are significant enough to trump the safety factor. Had all this expense and effort been concentrated on prevention, health education, whole body health and safe natural remedies to disease, we would all be sooo much better off.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 6:42 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 9:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 104 of 308 (428286)
10-15-2007 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by jar
10-15-2007 8:04 PM


Re: Playing with mercury
jar writes:
Growing up mercury was a favorite play toy. Everyone loved it and almost everybody had some. We would rub pennies in it and drop it on the floor then work the drops back together again, squeeze it between our fingers, just generally have fun with it.
1. We all did that back then when it was not known how dangerous it can be. We did likely have reactions but didn't know it was the mercury that gave us the headache, flu, hay fever or whatever.
2. Which is more dangerous, handling it with your fingers on relatively rare occasions or having it pumped into your blood multiple times during your developing years as a child by a doc and packing it into your mouth by a dentist?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by jar, posted 10-15-2007 8:04 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by jar, posted 10-15-2007 8:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 106 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2007 8:39 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 108 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2007 9:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 109 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 9:42 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 122 by nator, posted 10-16-2007 9:42 AM Buzsaw has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 105 of 308 (428288)
10-15-2007 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by Buzsaw
10-15-2007 8:24 PM


Re: Playing with mercury
2. Which is more dangerous, handling it with your fingers on relatively rare occasions or having it pumped into your blood multiple times during your developing years as a child by a doc and packing it into your mouth by a dentist?
Playing with it, without a doubt. The latter is not even close and simply nothing to worry about.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Buzsaw, posted 10-15-2007 8:24 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024