Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The 2016 United States Presidential Election
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 376 of 892 (794116)
11-10-2016 8:35 AM
Reply to: Message 368 by nwr
11-09-2016 7:00 PM


The Clinton mistakes
If your candidate consistently makes an initial (bad) choice counter to social progress, then they are being dragged to the correct path, not leading.
I was against Clinton in 2008, but not because of her vote. I was against her, because she was still defending that vote when should have been obvious by then that her vote was a mistake.
Exactly. She didn't really acknowledge it was a mistake until she was debating Bernie.
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 368 by nwr, posted 11-09-2016 7:00 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 382 by Diomedes, posted 11-10-2016 9:48 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 377 of 892 (794117)
11-10-2016 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 375 by jar
11-10-2016 8:17 AM


Re: 2020
If no one is alive in 2020 then it is a moot question however the evidence is that the US has survived many such incidents, ...
I don't think global climate change gives a hoot about US politics.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 375 by jar, posted 11-10-2016 8:17 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 379 by jar, posted 11-10-2016 8:42 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


(2)
Message 378 of 892 (794118)
11-10-2016 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 375 by jar
11-10-2016 8:17 AM


Re: 2020
If no one is alive in 2020 then it is a moot question however the evidence is that the US has survived many such incidents, a Civil War that was anything but civil
The civil war killed 600,000 folks out of a population of about 30 million. Yeah, the country did survive, but if this is an example intended to minimize concern over Trump, I personally find the argument wanting.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. Thomas Jefferson
Seems to me if its clear that certain things that require ancient dates couldn't possibly be true, we are on our way to throwing out all those ancient dates on the basis of the actual evidence. -- Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 375 by jar, posted 11-10-2016 8:17 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 380 by jar, posted 11-10-2016 8:52 AM NoNukes has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 414 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 379 of 892 (794119)
11-10-2016 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 377 by RAZD
11-10-2016 8:37 AM


Re: 2020
Well I think we can stop worrying about Global Climate Change. One of the key steps Trump has as part of his first hundred days is to turn NASAs gaze outward instead of inward navel staring at the Earth. That should reduce the alarmist news about Global Warming immediately.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 377 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2016 8:37 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 414 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 380 of 892 (794120)
11-10-2016 8:52 AM
Reply to: Message 378 by NoNukes
11-10-2016 8:37 AM


Re: 2020
Yet the Nation survived. Granted it was not all that great for those killed and for those whose homes and property were destroyed but US Industry and the Railroads and the Highway system expanded and Egyptian Cotton Industry was started and the tinned meats industry and and iron clad warships and expanded telegraph and the Army Ambulance Corps and Aerial Reconnaissance and long range weapons and naval mines developed and many individuals also profited.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 378 by NoNukes, posted 11-10-2016 8:37 AM NoNukes has not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1524 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 381 of 892 (794124)
11-10-2016 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 363 by Taq
11-09-2016 4:23 PM


I woke up this morning and was like whew what a nightmare.
I just dream' t that Trump got elected as president. :
Taq writes:
Then why did they re-elect almost every incumbent Republican running for Congress?
Perhaps folks just voting a straight Republican ticket.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 363 by Taq, posted 11-09-2016 4:23 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 387 by Taq, posted 11-10-2016 11:07 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
Diomedes
Member
Posts: 995
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


(1)
Message 382 of 892 (794125)
11-10-2016 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 376 by RAZD
11-10-2016 8:35 AM


Re: The Clinton mistakes
I was against Clinton in 2008, but not because of her vote. I was against her, because she was still defending that vote when should have been obvious by then that her vote was a mistake.
Exactly. She didn't really acknowledge it was a mistake until she was debating Bernie.
Ironically, that was Jeb's big problem. Despite the fact that he knew the decision to go to Iraq would come up and bring to light his idiot brother's moronic mistakes, he kept fumbling on the answer.
Pertaining to Hillary, after I saw the election outcome and the data pertaining to voter turnout, I am more convinced than ever that her biggest error was not making Bernie her VP. My guess is being that she is an egomaniac, like most politicians, she opted to not share the spotlight with her opponent. Regardless of how much appeal he had to his base.
Just as a sidebar, in my area of Florida, there were tons of Trump signs just prior to the election. But during the primaries, the most signs I saw were Bernie signs. There were 'Feel the Bern' banners on highway overpasses. He had massive appeal. And Hillary just completely squandered that.
My suspicion in the end is she just grossly underestimated both Bernie's appeal and Trumps.
Now she may still have won the election without Bernie had the FBI snafu not manifested. Along with the DNC hacks. But regardless, she decided to play the 'safe' game and assume that voters would just come to her because Trump was so repugnant. I think in a way, she neglected to realize she shared many of the same character flaws. So it almost became a wash between the two of them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 376 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2016 8:35 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1524 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


(5)
Message 383 of 892 (794127)
11-10-2016 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 370 by Tanypteryx
11-09-2016 7:45 PM


Hi Tanypteryx,
It is not Trump so much but freaken Pence that worries me. Trumps a egotistical load of hot air....but Pence? Pence is a koolaid drinking believer.
We will survive a Trump administration. I am hoping that the Donald flips and somehow converts into a progressive. What a laugh that would be. He doesn't seem as hawkish at least as Hillary seemed.
Heres to being hopeful.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 370 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-09-2016 7:45 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 384 by jar, posted 11-10-2016 10:06 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 388 by Taq, posted 11-10-2016 11:19 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 414 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 384 of 892 (794130)
11-10-2016 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 383 by 1.61803
11-10-2016 9:48 AM


Remember Ike and Warren
Ike appointed a conservative Supreme Court Justice (by the way it was a recess appointment) by the name of Warren. He also appointed Conservative Justices notably a guy named Harlan that ended up supporting Civil Rights and Equal Protection and Due Process and the prohibition of Religious Tests by States and opposing censoring free speech and ...
And then he went on to appoint that thorn in Reagan's side Brennan as well as Potter Stewart. (but Whitaker turned out to be a dud).
People often turn out to be far different than expected.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 383 by 1.61803, posted 11-10-2016 9:48 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9140
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


(1)
Message 385 of 892 (794134)
11-10-2016 10:28 AM


Next 4 years?
It is going to be a rough ride. The Trump, religious right interaction will be interesting. I think that both sides think they used the other to achieve their goals. Ultimately, and probably very shortly this pursuit of goals will cause them to diverge. In this battle the religious right will prevail. They have experience and numbers. If Trump stands in their way they will impeach him and the good Dominionist Pence will step up.
The Republican Party has been coopted and is now the tool of the Dominionists. That should scare the living shit out of every one of you. Dominionism is the Christian version of Sharia. Just as vile and just as deadly. They will kill anyone that does not believe as they believe. I am sure Dwise has some comments on it.
I supported Hillary Clinton in the general election. As a rational person I had no other choice. I did not like that choice, but life doesn't always give us choices we like. She was a poor choice from the start. Lots of baggage, perceived and real. She was a latecomer to any sort of progressive agenda. The Clinton/Kaine ticket kept quite a few dems home on election day. She and Bill come from the old DLC wing of the party. Basically, republican light. That being said, she was light years better then Donald Trump and Mike Pence.
Democratic Leadership Council - Wikipedia
The silver lining is that this campaign season has shown us the utter corruption of the Democratic Party and the amorality of the Republicans and Christian right. We now either get off our asses and make the Democratic Partya peoples party or we forge a new way forward. But forward we must go.
In the short run we are going to be losing a lot of what has been gained in the last 100 years.
The right to vote will be severely curtailed. Jim Crow type laws are already back in some places and more to follow.
The rights of LGBQT americans will be curtailed. Gay marriage will no longer be the law of the land. There will be a hodgepodge and states will not have to honor the marriages from other states. It is possible that there will be a law outlawing it nationwide. There may be laws outlawing homosexuality.
Millions will lose health insurance. There will be nothing put in place to remedy this. Health care costs will skyrocket for all(except the very wealthy)
New tax codes will drive up both the debt and deficit. Crippling taxes on the poor will spike crime rate. The economy will circle down the toilet. The rich will get richer. They will move to gated communities.
We will have more wars. When you have god on your side it is easy to tell who is good and who is bad. The bad must be destroyed.
You think I am over the top? Look at what the right is proposing. This is what it will be if they get to do it.
But they did save us from that nasty lady with the email problem.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 432 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(2)
Message 386 of 892 (794136)
11-10-2016 10:38 AM
Reply to: Message 362 by dronestar
11-09-2016 4:02 PM


Re: The Clinton Machine
dronestar writes:
Wow, you already read both of Mod's posts?
If Mod wants to explain his position to me, he's welcome to do so. Apparently you have nothing of your own to say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 362 by dronestar, posted 11-09-2016 4:02 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by dronestar, posted 11-10-2016 4:03 PM ringo has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10033
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


(2)
Message 387 of 892 (794139)
11-10-2016 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 381 by 1.61803
11-10-2016 9:43 AM


1.61803 writes:
Perhaps folks just voting a straight Republican ticket.
That's my conclusion as well. The most well established and most prominent Republican, Paul Ryan, was easily re-elected in Wisconsin, one of the states that supposedly "voted against the establishment". I call hooey on the claim it was an anti-establishment vote. It was a vote for a change in party, but not a vote for some existential change in politics as a whole. This makes much more sense given the history of parties having difficulty being elected into the White House after 2 terms in power.
What I also think is happening is that they are using the "outsider" tag to mask something much darker. People didn't like Trump because he was an outsider. They liked him because of the dog whistles he was all too eager to blow. His rhetoric was xenophobic, nativist, and nationalist. That's what they liked. Even if we all know that a lot of it is just hyperbole that no one thinks he will follow through on, he still displays the same disdain that his voters have. If a rank-and-file Republican had used the same rhetoric he would have had the same success.
Edited by Taq, : No reason given.
Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 381 by 1.61803, posted 11-10-2016 9:43 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10033
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 388 of 892 (794140)
11-10-2016 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 383 by 1.61803
11-10-2016 9:48 AM


1.61803 writes:
It is not Trump so much but freaken Pence that worries me. Trumps a egotistical load of hot air....but Pence? Pence is a koolaid drinking believer.
Pence is stridently Pro-Life. My hope is that the next 4 years will shut the door on Pro-Life rhetoric. We all know that voting to ban abortions is political suicide for the party as a whole. I highly, highly doubt that they will bring an abortion ban forth in the in next 4 years even though they have control of all 3 branches of government. If they fail to even try and ban abortions, we can all claim quite loudly that even if they claim they are Pro-Life, they really aren't. If elected, they will never put forth an abortion ban and we all know it.
Quite frankly, I think Democrats should just get out of their way. Don't filibuster anything. Republicans have been talking big for a decade now about what they would do, a lot of which is little more than rhetoric. When they are actually in the position to vote for their own bullshit it will produce two options. One, they end up not voting for it, allowing us to move past their rhetoric and towards more sane legislation. Two, they do vote for it and Democrats run against them using their vote against them. We may have to put up with same crap legislation for a little while, but it might come out for the positive in the long term.
For a little context, I consider all of this the bargaining stage in my movement through the 5 stages of grief.
Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 383 by 1.61803, posted 11-10-2016 9:48 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 389 by NoNukes, posted 11-10-2016 11:59 AM Taq has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 389 of 892 (794143)
11-10-2016 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 388 by Taq
11-10-2016 11:19 AM


I highly, highly doubt that they will bring an abortion ban forth in the in next 4 years even though they have control of all 3 branches of government.
The federal government may not be able to bring forth an abortion bad in the next 4 years, but they can arrange to allow individual states make many women's lives hell, or even end their lives simply by creating a Supreme Court that disrespects women they way 3.5 current Supreme Court already do. (Kennedy occasionally sees a limit on abortion he doesn't like, but the others never have).
Quite frankly, I think Democrats should just get out of their way. Don't filibuster anything. Republicans have been talking big for a decade now about what they would do, a lot of which is little more than rhetoric.
I agree. Perhaps giving the republicans a little rope will be great for generating interest in the 2018 midterm elections. Nothing else seems capable of waking up Democratic voters.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. Thomas Jefferson
Seems to me if its clear that certain things that require ancient dates couldn't possibly be true, we are on our way to throwing out all those ancient dates on the basis of the actual evidence. -- Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 388 by Taq, posted 11-10-2016 11:19 AM Taq has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 390 of 892 (794145)
11-10-2016 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 372 by ramoss
11-09-2016 11:18 PM


Re: The Clinton Machine
Ramoss writes:
Yes, I am sure. It was from a Lebanese massacre in 1982.
Okay, my apologies, and thank you for correcting me Ramoss. I will use a different photo in the future.
I am curious, . . . to prevent myself from making a similar error in the future, can you tell me how you identified this photo?
{I am going to do a PM with directions back to this message. The method I used is a Google image search. You can drag and drop any image into such a search and, among other things, the results will list many webpages that include the image. For the image in question, it was clear that it was indeed the 1982 Lebanese massacre. - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Answering question.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 372 by ramoss, posted 11-09-2016 11:18 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 394 by ramoss, posted 11-10-2016 11:35 PM dronestar has not replied
 Message 395 by ThinAirDesigns, posted 11-11-2016 10:01 AM dronestar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024