Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,450 Year: 3,707/9,624 Month: 578/974 Week: 191/276 Day: 31/34 Hour: 12/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Brand New Birther Thread
subbie
Member (Idle past 1276 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 16 of 218 (754535)
03-28-2015 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by RAZD
03-28-2015 8:28 AM


Re: the other audience ...
RAZD writes:
irregardless
Really?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by RAZD, posted 03-28-2015 8:28 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 03-28-2015 9:25 AM subbie has seen this message but not replied
 Message 18 by nwr, posted 03-28-2015 1:39 PM subbie has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(2)
Message 17 of 218 (754536)
03-28-2015 9:25 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by subbie
03-28-2015 9:20 AM


one of these things is just like the other
Irregardless means the same as regardless just as flammable and inflammable are synonyms.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by subbie, posted 03-28-2015 9:20 AM subbie has seen this message but not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 18 of 218 (754550)
03-28-2015 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by subbie
03-28-2015 9:20 AM


Re: the other audience ...
Irregardless of whether the word exists, it means the same as "regardless".
I never liked the word "irregardless". It sounds wrong. But I often hear it said.

Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by subbie, posted 03-28-2015 9:20 AM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by subbie, posted 03-28-2015 5:09 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied
 Message 20 by Capt Stormfield, posted 03-28-2015 10:32 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1276 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 19 of 218 (754560)
03-28-2015 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by nwr
03-28-2015 1:39 PM


Re: the other audience ...
Webster's calls it nonstandard. That's good enough for me.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by nwr, posted 03-28-2015 1:39 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009


Message 20 of 218 (754585)
03-28-2015 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by nwr
03-28-2015 1:39 PM


Re: the other audience ...
But I often hear it said.
I often see people use "wala" instead of "voila". I don't follow their lead either. Usage certainly does change over time, but both wala and irregardless are firmly in the sloppy and uninformed zone at this time.
Edited by Capt Stormfield, : edir typo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by nwr, posted 03-28-2015 1:39 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by subbie, posted 03-28-2015 11:02 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied
 Message 22 by ringo, posted 03-29-2015 2:56 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied
 Message 23 by Tanypteryx, posted 03-29-2015 3:06 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1276 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 21 of 218 (754587)
03-28-2015 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Capt Stormfield
03-28-2015 10:32 PM


Re: the other audience ...
I'm sure you could of come up with lots more examples.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Capt Stormfield, posted 03-28-2015 10:32 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 22 of 218 (754646)
03-29-2015 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Capt Stormfield
03-28-2015 10:32 PM


Re: the other audience ...
Capt Stormfield writes:
Usage certainly does change over time, but both wala and irregardless are firmly in the sloppy and uninformed zone at this time.
Or colourful. Me likee colourful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Capt Stormfield, posted 03-28-2015 10:32 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4413
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 23 of 218 (754647)
03-29-2015 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Capt Stormfield
03-28-2015 10:32 PM


Re: the other audience ...
Wala Wala Washington Kalamazoo!

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Capt Stormfield, posted 03-28-2015 10:32 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by RAZD, posted 03-29-2015 5:41 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message but not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 24 of 218 (754654)
03-29-2015 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Tanypteryx
03-29-2015 3:06 PM


Re: the other audience ...
Swaller dollar califlower alley karoo

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Tanypteryx, posted 03-29-2015 3:06 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message but not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 25 of 218 (754655)
03-29-2015 6:19 PM


Don't we know archaic barrel?

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 26 of 218 (795386)
12-12-2016 2:31 PM


more on the birther qustion from other thread
I’m bringing over some of the discussion of Obama’s birth from the President election 2016 thread:
Utterly obnoxious post by RAZD:
RAZD just flatly states that the only reason anyone is questioning Obama’s birth is racism. Evidence he gives is that nobody has objected to Cruz’s candidacy. Speaking for myself, I had no idea Cruz was not born in the US until it came up in discussion here. I wonder how many others knew that.
I think I would argue that either the Constitutional provision should be read absolutely literally to mean you have to be actually born on American soil, or mitigating circumstances have to be spelled out better. For instance I could argue that the main issues in the case of being born in a foreign country could involve whether both parents were US citizens at the time, and how long the candidate lived there among other things, and that the Constitution should even perhaps be rewritten to make all that clear. But Cruz was apparently himself a citizen of Canada which may be the main disqualifier in his case anyway. In any case Cruz’s ineligibility had nothing whatever to do with my reaction to Obama’s.
To the accusation that it’s that he’s not one of us, of course we want a President who is one of us, meaning AN AMERICAN and AN AMERICAN AT HEART, with the best interests of the country at heart, which was certainly the intention of the Founders; and a lot of us feel that Obama has been anything but that. To accuse us of racism is really low, it’s not about race, certainly not for me. As I said, I would love to see Alan Keyes as President, for years I’ve thought that, because it’s not about race, it’s about worldview, it’s about being American from the heart.
Next is the post by dwise who mostly argued with a side point I made about IF the claim is true that being born in Kenya doesn’t disqualify him and he went on and on about how I should have done enough research to be convined that it doesn’t. However, this is not anywhere near as open and shut as he makes it sound. It has not been settled at all . There are still many who believe it does disqualify him based on how they read that Constitutional passage.
There’s also a lot more evidence that he was born in Kenya than the few bits I could remember: such as the publisher of his book who wrote that he was born in Kenya, and such as the documents that have come out from Occidental College showing that he requested aid as a foreign student. He’s also listed as a Muslim foreign student.
Modulous went to a lot of trouble to list court cases that decided against arguments for Obama’s foreign birth. That’s pretty impressive I must say but my impression is that a lot of it was dismissed before any case was actually conducted, on the basis of a judgment that it was frivolous and that sort of thing, so actual evidence wasn’t seriously considered. And of course I’d have to read every case to find out what evidence WAS considered, because some evidence is better than others.
This site has quite a comprehensive list of the evidence that has been collected that Obama was born in Kenya, at least that he was a foreigner when he came to the US to go to school. This latest information from Occidental College is pretty damning it seems to me. Indonesian foreign student applied for aid as a foreign student, faith listed as Muslim. I think most of the other evidence that’s been out there for years is good enough despite all the attempts to rationalize it away, but this one is particularly good.
Another thing I just this minute heard about that needs to be checked out is that he traveled as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia to Pakistan in 1981 with an Indonesian passport which proves citizenship. Also in the company of "another" Muslim according to my source.

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Modulous, posted 12-12-2016 2:54 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 28 by PaulK, posted 12-12-2016 3:19 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 29 by NoNukes, posted 12-12-2016 3:28 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 36 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-12-2016 4:54 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 40 by PaulK, posted 12-12-2016 5:26 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 50 by Modulous, posted 12-12-2016 7:30 PM Faith has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 27 of 218 (795389)
12-12-2016 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Faith
12-12-2016 2:31 PM


Re: more on the birther qustion from other thread
. This latest information from Occidental College is pretty damning it seems to me. Indonesian foreign student applied for aid as a foreign student, faith listed as Muslim.
This 'news' came out in 2009. April 1st. Think about it. It was labelled as coming from the Associated Press, but did not follow standard guidelines of the AP. The group that supposedly released it, "Americans for Freedom of Information" didn't exist prior to the article's release (although a group by that name mocking those that fell for the April Fools Day joke popped up shortly therafter).
The Occidental College says he attended as a US citizen under the name 'Barack Obama'. The American Indonesian Exchange Foundation does not give aid to undergraduates.
The records claimed by the fictional group, aren't actually public information.
Obvious fakery is obvious.
Another thing I just this minute heard about that needs to be checked out is that he traveled as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia to Pakistan in 1981 with an Indonesian passport which proves citizenship. Also in the company of "another" Muslim according to my source.
I've lost count of the number of times your sources have lied to you, in fact I've lost count of the subset of times you conceded this to have been the case.
Modulous went to a lot of trouble to list court cases that decided against arguments for Obama’s foreign birth. That’s pretty impressive I must say but my impression is that a lot of it was dismissed before any case was actually conducted
My point there was that there was a LOT of effort put into Birther nonsense.
The fact that multiple independent courts at all levels looked at the claims being made and found them absurd clearly doesn't deter you in the slightest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Faith, posted 12-12-2016 2:31 PM Faith has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


(2)
Message 28 of 218 (795390)
12-12-2016 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Faith
12-12-2016 2:31 PM


Re: more on the birther qustion from other thread
I don't think that your hatred of Obama is due to racism, Faith. I think it has a lot to do with your love of hate, and your desire to destroy freedom in the U.S. Of course you will happily embrace any accusation - no matter how baseless if it is directed at anyone you hate. As we have seen.
Cruz, of course is a Republican so of course the Right would not apply the same criteria to him. Double standards are endemic to the Right, because their strongest guiding principle is getting what they want and they have no interest in fairness or justice.
According to the Constitution the Supreme Court determines the interpretation of the Constitution. If your argument is based purely on your interpretation - without reference to past Court decisions then you have not done the research. And if you don't know that much then you really haven't adequately considered the matter.
Finally, you should realise that a court case is only dismissed as frivolous if the judge determines that it has no chance of success. It may be that those bringing the case failed because they were incompetent in other respects - but that hardly gives us cause to think that their assessment of the evidence is any good, and if there was a real case why wouldn't somebody competent bring it ? Surely the establishment Republicans could have done it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Faith, posted 12-12-2016 2:31 PM Faith has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 29 of 218 (795391)
12-12-2016 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Faith
12-12-2016 2:31 PM


Re: more on the birther qustion from other thread
This site has quite a comprehensive list of the evidence that has been collected that Obama was born in Kenya, at least that he was a foreigner when he came to the US to go to school.
Reading your posts has that train wreck fascination.
You found something on a web page...
Another thing I just this minute heard about that needs to be checked out is that he traveled as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia to Pakistan in 1981 with an Indonesian passport which proves citizenship. Also in the company of "another" Muslim according to my source.
You just heard something...
I had no idea Cruz was not born in the US until it came up in discussion here. I wonder how many others knew that.
You don't know the facts...
Trump repeatedly leveled birther charges against Cruz during the primary. And folks have been throwing Cruz up in birthers faces ever since he elected to run. What other relevant facts have you refused to learn or accept?
Seriously, why should anyone respond to what you post? Modulus is doing you a huge courtesy by taking you the least bit seriously. FWIW, I don't think you are a racist but the xenophobic stuff you spew here is sure not any improvement over racism.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. Thomas Jefferson
Seems to me if its clear that certain things that require ancient dates couldn't possibly be true, we are on our way to throwing out all those ancient dates on the basis of the actual evidence. -- Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Faith, posted 12-12-2016 2:31 PM Faith has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10042
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


(1)
Message 30 of 218 (795393)
12-12-2016 3:57 PM


The Ultimate Irony
The Ultimate Irony is that it wouldn't have mattered if Obama was born in Kenya. His mother is a US citizen, so Obama is automatically a citizen no matter where he is born. This is why Ted Cruz was allowed to run for President.
So what reason was there for pursuing all of this birther nonsense? Let's just posit for the moment that Obama was born in Kenya and it is 2008. Now what? No court case is going to remove him from office because he is a US citizen through his mother. So what is the point?
What other reason is there other than to make Obama look more like an undesirable black dude? I can't think of one. Ted Cruz looks generically white, and was born in Canada. Not one Republican made a stink about it, NOT EVEN TRUMP!! Here was Trump campaigning against a presidential candidate that openly admits he wasn't born in the US, and not one peep. WHY?????? The answer is obvious. It's Canada, and Ted Cruz is white.

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by PaulK, posted 12-12-2016 4:02 PM Taq has replied
 Message 48 by NoNukes, posted 12-12-2016 6:30 PM Taq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024