|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Tribute Thread For the Recently Raptured Faith | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Faith writes: No, the Protestant Reformers traced their conclusions back to the beginning too. What is the point of repeating the same bald unsupported assertion you've made before. I already showed that Martin Luther didn't advocate inerrancy in Message 154 of the Bible Inerrancy stands against all objections thread:
quote: --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
...
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
And I answered you that what Luther meant is disputed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Faith writes: And I answered you that what Luther meant is disputed. It was a bald, unsupported assertion when you first said this, as I pointed out at the time, and it still is. What you actually offered at the time was excuses, incorrect guesses, and pigheadedness: the computer is slow, your eyes give out rapidly, Luther must have been talking about Apocrypha (he wasn't), you would only offer assertions, and you were sticking by the Chicago Statement. If you have an actual rebuttal that you'd like to offer about Martin Luther having argued that Bible passages must be tested to determine whether they were the word of God (as argued in, for example, Reformers Did Not Affirm Inerrancy) then go ahead. But if you still have nothing of substance to say then you shouldn't post. Unsupported affirmations are not evidence. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
Sorry to be so slow. Been out of town without a computer.
Percy writes: Sure I find it a troublesome passage but if we look at the culture of the time it isn't completely surprising. As we can see in the OT the idea that they would be executed is consistent with the Jewish culture of the day. As we can also see in Acts 1 the first Jesus followers in some cases still expected Jesus to overthrow the Romans militarily. That is what they believed a messiah was supposed to do. At that point in the very early church they had not grasped the idea that the weapon to be used in defeating the Romans was love. (In essence the message wasn't that it was the Romans that were the enemy but evil itself, but that Rome embodied that evil.) They were still thinking that if they appeased God that He would lead them in overthrowing their enemies. As we read further on in Acts however we can see that the Jesus' message did fairly quickly become the norm.
You don't find it surprising that the followers of Jesus murdered a married couple? I think most people, believers and non-believers alike, would think your analysis has gone off the deep end. Doesn't it make much, much more sense that the story was apocryphal and intended to serve as an object lesson about the importance of sharing the gifts of your life with the church?Percy writes: Well, true or not, whatever really happened, the story paints a horrible and murderous picture of the early church.GDR writes: AgreedPercy writes: There were differences in the early church as their thinking transitioned from an eye for an eye mentality to what Jesus taught. Look at the disagreement that Paul had with Peter. It took time for things to get sorted out. If it was necessary to be a Christian to believe that every Christian, early or not, had to refrain from evil then I'd be in trouble. I belong to a religion that is aligned with the likes of the leaders of the crusades as well as televangelists, and for that matter a church that tolerates me. I don't see how you can feel that way and still be a member of such a religion.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
GDR writes: Percy writes: You don't find it surprising that the followers of Jesus murdered a married couple? I think most people, believers and non-believers alike, would think your analysis has gone off the deep end. Doesn't it make much, much more sense that the story was apocryphal and intended to serve as an object lesson about the importance of sharing the gifts of your life with the church? Sure I find it a troublesome passage... I'm sorry, I can't really reply to the other things you explain. I can't get past the idea that apostles murdering church members (or anyone) is merely "troublesome." --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
Percy writes: I'm sorry, I can't really reply to the other things you explain. I can't get past the idea that apostles murdering church members (or anyone) is merely "troublesome." Well let's go with horrifically troublesome. My point would be that it is part of the Jewish culture at the the time. Their understanding of Jesus' message didn't catch on over night. What would be beyond troublesome is if I had to believe as Faith does that God actually did it.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
How about this? Ananias "gave up the ghost" and Sapphira "yielded up the ghost" in the KJV, so couldn't they be said to have done it to themselves once they realized what they had done?
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
Percy writes: Sure, that could be the case. Actually the biggest argument against my suggestion is that execution wouldn't normally have been done on the spot. They would most likely have been taken to some form of hearing first which would favour your suggestion. How about this? Ananias "gave up the ghost" and Sapphira "yielded up the ghost" in the KJV, so couldn't they be said to have done it to themselves once they realized what they had done? Another possibility is that the apostles considered them dead to the Lord and the story was embellished to include the burial. The basic point though is that the God we see whose Word or nature is perfectly embodied by Jesus wouldn't have done nor commanded their death, whatever actually happened.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capt Stormfield Member Posts: 429 From: Vancouver Island Joined:
|
Their understanding of Jesus' message didn't catch on over night. And when, precisely, did it catch on with newly minted Christians? By the inquisition? Or a bit later?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capt Stormfield Member Posts: 429 From: Vancouver Island Joined: |
You don't find it surprising that the followers of Jesus murdered a married couple? I think most people, believers and non-believers alike, would think your analysis has gone off the deep end. Doesn't it make much, much more sense that the story was apocryphal and intended to serve as an object lesson about the importance of sharing the gifts of your life with the church? Que? What on earth, or more specifically in the history of Christianity, would make this seem even slightly unusual?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
CS writes:
Religion can always be misused as a road to power and influence over others. There has also been a huge amount of good done by Christians. Neither confirm nor deny the validity of the life death and resurrection of Jesus. And when, precisely, did it catch on with newly minted Christians? By the inquisition? Or a bit later?He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
CS writes: GDR writes: Their understanding of Jesus' message didn't catch on over night. And when, precisely, did it catch on with newly minted Christians? By the inquisition? Or a bit later? The disciples were pretty dense about Jesus' mission, still retaining the false idea that the Messiah would liberate them from Rome, but they got it pretty loud and clear after the resurrection while they were praying in the upper room and the Holy Spirit came upon them. That was the beginning of the Church. The Inquisition both official and unofficial which lasted for centuries was the work of the Antichrist papacy and it killed millions of true Christians. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
GDR writes:
To me, it seems pretty clear from a plain reading of the text that God killed them. The basic point though is that the God we see whose Word or nature is perfectly embodied by Jesus wouldn't have done nor commanded their death, whatever actually happened.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
ringo writes: I agree. The thing is though that in reading it that way we then have to reject the idea that Jesus perfectly embodied the nature of God. A plain reading of the teaching of what we have from Jesus throughout the Gospels, and the Epistles for that matter, show that such an action would be completely foreign to the nature of God. With this in mind we have to look for another explanation rather that the plain reading. To me, it seems pretty clear from a plain reading of the text that God killed them.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024