|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1433 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Just because science didn't know where to look, and misinterpreted what they did see, is no reason to diss the event.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
You thought poor little science has the knowledge or ability to get the knowledge of how deep the fountains of the deep were?? Ha.
They are ignorant of such things. Woefully. Willingly. Gleefully. Totally.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
As explained, the flood was a time of great extinction, and a time when stuff reached the surface of the earth from both deep in the earth, and space (where science says iridium is to be found).
Edited by creation, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
quote: No one asked what you who lived many millennia after there even were fountains of the deep in existence experienced!!! You kidding? Besides, no one says the water brought up had to be limited to the depth of the crust! Look at the evidence, it seems iridium was with the water, and how deep does science say that is? Ha (as if it had a clue)
quote:Truth may be a better approach to these issues. Name ONE of your so called experts that studied any violent rupture of a fountain of the deep, or from a window of heaven!!!!!!!?? By the way, the even was thousands of years ago...not centuries.Your claims are absolutely destroyed here. quote:Finally. You admit true ignorance. Then of course you follow it with a plea to believe real hard, because somewhere...in hiding apparently...there are experts who know. Hilarious. quote:I think of myself not as some mere apologist, but more of an evo demolition expert! The point about you peddling beliefs as science, is that you do not offer your religion as such, but commit fraud.
quote:A big extinction is associated with the time of the impact... Being caused by it is another matter! Whether even the impact was from below orn ot is not studied or apparently known!
quote: Since the flood water came from even deeper space, you are in no position to tell us how much iridium it brought also! No position at all.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4444 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
from Message 1153
Tanypteryx writes: creation writes:
You're so funny. All your posts here demonstrate that you have no clue about reality or facts. There is no evidence of a global flood anywhere in any geological formation. It is fictional just like every other story in your bible. Science has known this for 200 years. Your claims that the flood is fiction have no basis in reality or fact. creation writes: Just because science didn't know where to look, and misinterpreted what they did see, is no reason to diss the event. So, they didn't know where to look but they misinterpreted it when they did see it. Does that actually make sense to you? I know you aren't aware of this, but science looks everywhere. If you think science misinterpreted evidence you need to demonstrate exactly what observations were made and why the interpretations of those observations are incorrect and why your interpretations should replace them. If you mean disregard the fictional flood, then of course we should, because there is absolutely no shred of evidence to support it, so indeed diss the event.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
For the most part, yes!
However, I happen to know my Friend that made the planet, and have details of the materials He uses in other projects. Material such as Gold and diamonds and rubies, and topaz and amethyst, and spiritual materials, and lapis lazuli, and emerald for example. The model of the inner earth science offers has us living on fire and dirt in a fluke universe..etc etc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
looking at the article on your formation in wiki I see this
"The formation mechanisms of the chromitite seams in the Bushveld Igneous Complex are highly debated: numerous mechanisms have been proposed." A simple conclusion would be to assume it was formed in the former nature. That would explain why they struggle to cook up explanations now! The evidence mounts.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
quote: So there is a trend to find more iridium deeper down. The evidence mounts. Edited by creation, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Iridium and the KT level for example...misinterpreted. Sullied by your religion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
No? I thought it decreased as one got further from the (fount of the deep remnant?) in Yucatan?
Since there were phases to the flood, we also could expect it to be prevalent at a certain time! Got any tough questions now?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Science doesn't know. This is a silence forum. Once we establish science does not know, you can move this thread over to the religious debate area!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4444 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
As explained, the flood was a time of great extinction, and a time when stuff reached the surface of the earth from both deep in the earth, and space (where science says iridium is to be found). You didn't explain anything. How is this an answer to Message 1154?
Tanypteryx writes: creation writes:
What are those earmarks? This has the earmarks of the flood. It looks to me like you are making up more BS about your fictional flood.
creation writes: As for space...the waters resided out beyond where the stars are that came to earth in the flood. This leaves a lot of room for the water picking up iridium!!! Out beyond where the stars are? You're kidding, right? So, you still don't know what the earmarks of a flood are, let alone your fictional worldwide flood? You just keep making up imaginary fantasies about fictional water from Earth's core and more fictional water from "beyond where the stars are." On top of all your other mistakes, you don't seem to realize that iridium is not soluble in water, leaving you without an explanation how water could deposit iridium in the K-Pg boundary layer in the pattern actually observed. Your whole imaginary fictional fantasy has been blasted so full of holes by science that there is nothing left to hold it together.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4444 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Iridium and the KT level for example...misinterpreted. Can you point to the interpretation that is incorrect? Nope, didn't think so. So you still have no clue what you are talking about and have nothing but empty bullshit for an answer?
Sullied by your religion. You sully your religion with your fictional fantasy. What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4444 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
Science doesn't know. This is a silence forum. Once we establish science does not know, you can move this thread over to the religious debate area! So far, you are doing a great job establishing that you have no knowledge about science or how to demonstrate science is wrong about anything. It's truly bizarre that you think religion is the worst possible description you can call something. What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4444 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Got any tough questions now? I have one.....why do you still believe in your misinterpretation of an imaginary, fictional, fantasy flood story in the face of overwhelming contrary physical evidence?What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024