Author
|
Topic: CLOSING THE THREAD
|
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3048 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: 11-21-2003
|
|
Message 1 of 11 (69479)
11-26-2003 8:16 PM
|
|
|
I want my topic removed because you censored out my master conclusion then you proceeded to ignore all my responses. Nowhere did I insult anyone, I only went as far as the previous replies went with me. All you atheists/darwinists can orgy by yourselves and flatter yourselves with the illuusion that you are open minded. I have been censored without any justification whatsoever. I respectfully request that my topic be erased as I will not be participating any longer. I will not waste my time , as I am glad I found out the truth about this site early on. My topic was accurate , it did offer SOME evidence for creationism and that is not a matter of opinion. My topic did say "How does any of this evidence creationism" then I answered it. You all haven't the integrity to admit you overreacted. I will not be censored, I have done nothing at all to warrant this, all this as I am armed to the teeth with facts and evidence. But what for ? To have my ultimate point negated by people who are not enlightened enough to comprehend it . Atheism is a penalty from God for continually denying Him. You have no God sense, spiritual things do not make sense to you because God has removed your ability to understand them as His response to you rejecting Him. You think He doesnt exist because He has made you believe that , this is what the Bible teaches concerning persons who refuse to open their brain about God. W.T.
Replies to this message: | | Message 4 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 11-26-2003 8:45 PM | | Cold Foreign Object has not replied |
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 2 of 11 (69481)
11-26-2003 8:39 PM
|
|
|
I insist that the thread be retained so that the accuracy or otherwise of Willowtree's assertions can be judged by others by reading the original material.
|
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2302 days) Posts: 2073 From: The Universe Joined: 10-11-2003
|
|
Message 3 of 11 (69482)
11-26-2003 8:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 2 by wj 11-26-2003 8:39 PM
|
|
Don't worry WJ, contrary to popular opinion, we don't censor topics here. I found some of the attempts at discussion interesting and the thread will remain, if only as a springboard to further discussion with more temperate posters. ------------------
AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe
This message is a reply to: | | Message 2 by wj, posted 11-26-2003 8:39 PM | | wj has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 5 by wj, posted 11-26-2003 9:03 PM | | AdminAsgara has not replied |
|
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member
|
Now it seems the truth is creeping out, that a mob of atheists/darwinists are practicing the fine art of fundementalist scientism censorship. How is this not insulting?
I have done nothing at all to warrant this, all this as I am armed to the teeth with facts and evidence. Facts? Evidence? I see neither in your posts. Just so you know, not everything you state is a fact In every single one of your posts you have just made assertions. You have yet to provide evidence for any of them. As for the alleged "censorship" you need to stay calm and contact the admin that edited the post and ask for a reason. By insulting him you are only making yourself look ignorant. If you think that you were wronged then you should try to explain why you think this without throwing out insults left and right.
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
I didn't expect that the thread would be deleted, however I wanted to take the precaution of being explicit. The same could not be said for some creatioist-controlled boards I have visited. On reading the latest posts by Willowtree, I am left with the impression of an immature, petulent personality. It may be that s/he is merely inventing a rational for abandoning the many questions which have been raised for her/him in the thread but ignored.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 3 by AdminAsgara, posted 11-26-2003 8:44 PM | | AdminAsgara has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5033 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 6 of 11 (69489)
11-26-2003 9:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 5 by wj 11-26-2003 9:03 PM
|
|
One had to be able to read between the letters as we still cant between the lines for any given word. well, ohk.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 5 by wj, posted 11-26-2003 9:03 PM | | wj has not replied |
|
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2302 days) Posts: 2073 From: The Universe Joined: 10-11-2003
|
|
Message 7 of 11 (70147)
11-30-2003 7:54 PM
|
|
|
Willowtree
Willowtree, I am going to attempt to talk to you one more time. NO ONE! I repeat NO ONE, is attempting to censor you or your opinion. You posted an interesting topic that was getting responses. The responses, seemed to be focusing on the resurrection and AM decided to close the thread as off-topic. Dan, another interested responder to your thread, talked AM into opening your topic again. If you were concerned with the thread title, you could have rationally discussed this with AM and come to an understanding. Instead you chose to get angry and accusatory. Numerous posters attempted to calm you down and explain, but you refused. I closed the thread to stop it turning into a flame war. In my non-admin role, I had asked you several questions that I hadn't recieved an answer to, so I opened a new topic to discuss these questions. Did you reply to my questions? NO, you chose to continue the flaming on the new thread. If you truly want to discuss the issues, then CALM DOWN and discuss them. If you, as you have claimed several times, are done talking to us, then be done. The accusatory, insulting language you have used on several threads will....stop....now. This is not a suggestion. ------------------
AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe
|
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3048 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: 11-21-2003
|
I only resonded accordingly to what was first initiated upon me first. I didn't respond to your questions and challenges to PROTEST the title change and the reasons given for that unwarranted action/censorship. I liked your questions but the title change gutted my master conclusion and this I could not not tolerate. Do you know why God punished Eve the way He did ? Eve's penalty was to bear children AND serve the inferior {the male} this means that God recognized that women are superior to men, what a brilliant punishment to make the superior serve the inferior. I don't like women to have power over me , I like to enforce God's punishment upon women, which means that the fact that I am bowing to your authority says that I want to tangle with you over the truth, but that censor ax will eliminate me .
This message is a reply to: | | Message 7 by AdminAsgara, posted 11-30-2003 7:54 PM | | AdminAsgara has replied |
|
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2302 days) Posts: 2073 From: The Universe Joined: 10-11-2003
|
Willow, Thank you for replying in a calmer tone. Your original thread can still be reopened if you wish. As for the title, if you appeal to Adminnemooseus with your concerns (notice NOT accusations) this might all be resolved. I do not have the authority to change the title back. If you choose to not have the thread reopened, I will appeal to AdminBrian to reopen my thread, (though I do have the power to do it myself, I won't step on another Admin's toes). Let me further say that I have been reading the debating you have been doing on other threads and I hope to put this behind us. I really do want to hear "your" answers to my questions. ------------------
AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe
|
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member
|
Wow Willowtree, man you just don't get it. Saying that god wants women to serve men isn't the best way to get Admin Asgara to discuss the issues with your posts.
|
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3048 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: 11-21-2003
|
Could you place all your points and subsequent debating questions that you just referenced in one post or no ?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 9 by AdminAsgara, posted 12-02-2003 9:25 PM | | AdminAsgara has not replied |
|