Humour VII

Is that like reading Shakespeare in the original German? Or in the original Klingon?

LOL

rofl

Just the usual lie that creationists deny MICROevolution.

And among the other misrepresentations of creationism in this piece of BS is the usual lack of recognition that creationists believe the FALL explains disease and error and evil in life. Really, the lies about what creationism teaches make this debate absolutely ridiculous. The only true thing this guy said was that believing in nothing, even God, is perfectly compatible with today's Catholicism.

What's the difference between a microscope and a telescope?

There's a rather large difference, actually, what's your point?

Really? A tube with lenses at both ends - which one is that?The differences are in the details, not the fundamentals.

Uh huh, that's YOUR point of view, my point was that you ignore your opponents' point of view. Giving the usual fantasy-based answer to it is the same as ignoring it. Golly gee, if we can get so many different dogs from the dog genome surely we can get something besides dogs from the dog genome, what's to stop us?. Pure fantasy bullshit, mental games, self-delusion, all based on FAITH that it MUST be so.However, it remains the POV of your opponents and all you succeed in doing by ignoring it is making us repeat ourselves. I've also ANSWERED your stupid claim in the other thread, which of course you haven't bothered to think about for half a second. The genetic facts themselves prevent macroevolution.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

So stick your claim in the science forum and have the discussion

I'm looking at you through the big end of a telescope.

I guess the salient point here is that creationists have no sense of humour.Talk about a buzzkill.

I think everything Faith says is hilarious.