Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation as presented in Genesis chapters 1 and 2
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 376 of 607 (566391)
06-24-2010 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 375 by ICANT
06-24-2010 1:18 PM


Re: Day
Actually if you only have evening and morning you have a dark period of about 12 hours.
No, it says: "and the evening and the morning were the Nth day."
The evening and the morning are one day, unless you are calling god a liar?
To have a full 24 hour day you must have a light period of about 12 hours and a dark portion of about 12 hours.
That would mean that when god created the firmament on day 2, that he did it in just a 12 hour portion of the day. Was that during the light portion or dark portion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 375 by ICANT, posted 06-24-2010 1:18 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 378 by ICANT, posted 06-24-2010 2:13 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 377 of 607 (566394)
06-24-2010 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 374 by purpledawn
06-24-2010 1:04 PM


Re: Who, Whom, What, When, and Why
Hi PD,
purpledawn writes:
Again, it is unreasonable to look at these sentences as existing alone from the rest of the piece.
ICANT 1:1 In 1995 I built a house.
1:2 The house was in terrible unlivable shape.
1:3 I repaired the roof.
1:4 We cleaned the inside.
1:5 I replaced all the electrical wiring.
1:6 We replaced all the drywall.
1:7 We painted all the walls.
1:8 We replaced all the furnishings.
1:9 The house was finished and the family moved in.
ICANT 2:1 This is the history of the house in the year I built the house.
2:2 The foundation was poured.
2:3 The foundation block was put in place and the inside was filled will fill.
2:4 The plumbing pipes were put in place, and the fill was leveled and prepared for the pouring of the slab.
2:5 The slab was poured and finished.
2:6 The blocks were laid and the lintel poured.
2:7 The trusses were set, the plywood applied and the roofing installed.
2:8 The framing was installed, dividing the house into 4 bedrooms 3 bathrooms 1 office 7 closets 1, 2 car garage and 1 screened porch the electrical installed, drywall applied and finished.
2:9 The painting done, fixtures and furnishing put in place.
2:10 The family moved in.
You can determine from ICANT 1:1 that in 1995 I built a house.
You can determine from ICANT 2:1 and the history given the details of the house I built in 1995.
From the above you can not determine why the house was in unlivable shape in ICANT 1:2.
Well in 2004 hurricane Ivan came along and did a lot of damage to the house and all the repairs listed from ICANT 1:2-1:9 had to be made so the house was livable.
Please explain the difference in this story and the one I have discussed in this thread concerning Genesis chapter 1 and 2.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 374 by purpledawn, posted 06-24-2010 1:04 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 379 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-24-2010 3:01 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 381 by purpledawn, posted 06-24-2010 5:21 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 378 of 607 (566395)
06-24-2010 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 376 by New Cat's Eye
06-24-2010 1:44 PM


Re: Day
Hi CS,
CS writes:
The evening and the morning are one day, unless you are calling god a liar?
I am not calling God a liar but you seem to be.
1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
I said God called the light portion Day. Genesis 1:5 verifies that.
When you add the evening of that light period and the end of the dark period God called night with morning which God called the first day.
I said God called the light portion and dark portion a day. Genesis 1:5 verifies that.
What comes before the and in your statement below?
CS writes:
"and the evening and the morning were the Nth day."
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 376 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-24-2010 1:44 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 379 of 607 (566404)
06-24-2010 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 377 by ICANT
06-24-2010 2:00 PM


Re: Who, Whom, What, When, and Why
You can determine from ICANT 1:1 that in 1995 I built a house.
You can determine from ICANT 2:1 and the history given the details of the house I built in 1995.
From the above you can not determine why the house was in unlivable shape in ICANT 1:2.
Well in 2004 hurricane Ivan came along and did a lot of damage to the house and all the repairs listed from ICANT 1:2-1:9 had to be made so the house was livable.
Please explain the difference in this story and the one I have discussed in this thread concerning Genesis chapter 1 and 2.
Nothing. They're both retarded ways to tell a story. Not something god would do. And no way to reveal some great important truth.
But from that stuff alone, nobody is saying that you're story is inconsistent. The inconsistency is exposed when we get to Gen 5 and see that Its talking about the same people as Gen 4.
But again, yes your story is consistant up to that point. So what? Straggler's 2 earths story was consistent as well. Consistency doesn't mean its right.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 377 by ICANT, posted 06-24-2010 2:00 PM ICANT has not replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1963 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 380 of 607 (566412)
06-24-2010 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 369 by New Cat's Eye
06-24-2010 10:01 AM


Re: Interpertation
Why? Its just an old folklore.
Well, I am persuaded otherwise. In the first 6 chatpers of Genesis we are told of so many fundamental questions of human existence, that I think I am dealing with God's revelation.
Ie.
1.) The origin of the universe
2.) The origin of animal life
3.) The origin of human life
4.) The purpose of human life
5.) The origin of marriage
6.) The origin of sin in man
7.) The first family'
8.) The first murder
9.) The first nomad
10.) The first city
11.) The origin of early migration of man over the earth
12.) The origin of agriculture
13.) The orgin of musicianship
14.) The origin of metal industry
16.) The first callapse of human society
17.) The way of salvation
18.) The origin of three great monotheistic faiths in Abraham
Now there is plenty of folklore that deals with one, two, or three of these issues. But I dare say no book except Genesis contains so many important origins of the world and humanity.
I can't dismiss it as just folklore.

I take it as a stated fact for sure.
But its so blatantly incorrect!?
Why ? God created the universe in the beginning.
Do you know otherwise ?
Where did it come from ?

What evidence do you have that God did not create the heavens and the earth in the beginning ?
The earth and the heavens did not come about at the same time, the earth formed later than the heavens.
Maybe not. But I don't think "In the beginning" insists upon that.
Consider this quote from J. Pye Smith in 1839.
" A philosophical survey of the initial sections of the Bible, (Gen. i,1 to ii, 3) brings out the result:
1.) "That the first sentence is a simple, independent, all-comprehending axiom, to the effect: that matter, elementary or combined. aggregated only or organized, and dependent, sentient, and intellectual beings have not existed from eternity, either in self-continuity or succession, but had a beginning; that their beginning took place by the all-powerful will of one Being, self-existent, independent, and infinite in all perfection; and that the date of that beginning is not made known."

This is a statement of fact to be believed by faith:
"By faith we understand that the universe has been framed by the word of God, so that what is seen has not come into being out of things which appear." (Heb 11:3)
I don't have a problem with God being the one who did it.
Okay, I guess we agree. God began the universe. He is the Originator of its existence.
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
Yeah, but your looking at it from now-a-days.
The earth was "formless and void", which is referring to Chaos, which the cultures of the time thought of as the default state of existence. [/qs]
The earth became such is an admissible translation. And the two words tohu wa bohu are a Hebrew play on words something like the expression "topsy turvy". When used together in Scriupture they indicate the result of a judgment of God.
That may not be true when each of the words appears alone by itself.

The earth is not the planet as a whole, but what the people viewed as their land. The deep referred to the vast uninhabitable body of salt water that was non-earth. The water is the regular, non-salty, water that is the purifier, the allower of life.
So we have the land in chaos, and the deep already being there, as well as fresh water, and god jiggering with them to make a habitable place for us.
All the details of this ancient state of the earth are not given in Genesis. Latter in the Bible we pick up clues about a pre-Adamic economy in which a great cosmic revolt took place.
The details are sketchy. But they are enough to convince some of us that the earth BECAME without form and void.
Did you ever notice that on each day God looked at what was made and saw that "it was good" . But concerning the firmament of the atmosphere that axiom was not mentioned.
And I believe that left over in the air were the opposition party against God from pre-Adamic days. That is the hosts of Satan. They were left over in the atmosphere and perhaps for this reason we see silence concering the 2nd day. On all other instances we see that God saw the it was good. But not with the atmosphere.
Another clue is of course a lying enemy of God in the garden of Eden. Perhaps the FIRST question every Bible reader must ask is "WHY in a paradise situation created by God is there this lying serpent ?"
There are clues that something negative is left over from a previous time.
Latter in the Bible the pieces of the puzzle are added.

Its fairly straight-forward and fits with the culture of the time.
On the other hand, we have the planet, a concept the culture of the time didn't have, going through some kind of catastrophe first. But that doesn't really fit with views of the culture that this story sprang from. Plus, its not as striaght-forward and the story is some kind of secret code, that the intended audience would not have received, that you have to unlock to get the real understanding.
There is no secret code. But as God's people mature in understanding of His will the layers of insight into the Bible are pealed away.
Sometimes such knowledge is premature and not needed. But at such a time when God's people enter into spiritual warfare deeper insight is needed and furnished by men of God and the Holy Spirit.
God intends that man would be His deputy authority over his creation. That assignment was damaged and lost. At least it was corrupted.
We see a restoral of it in stages with the saints of God. We see a real leap forward in the life of the Son of God. That is His authority over creation and its negatives such as disease, storms, death.
As His church comes into spiritual battle with the enemies of God it becomes necessary that the light shine again on Genesis and we see deeper into what is written there. We need to see the origin of the enemy of God and man.
Creation / Deastruction / Restoration does more to strip the enemies of God naked then any other competing view, I feel.
The words of Genesis have not changed. The insight and the illumination of the words may deepen as God sees the need to instruct His fighting saints.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 369 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-24-2010 10:01 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 381 of 607 (566445)
06-24-2010 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 377 by ICANT
06-24-2010 2:00 PM


Re: Who, Whom, What, When, and Why
quote:
Well in 2004 hurricane Ivan came along and did a lot of damage to the house and all the repairs listed from ICANT 1:2-1:9 had to be made so the house was livable.
Please explain the difference in this story and the one I have discussed in this thread concerning Genesis chapter 1 and 2.
The difference is that you're recounting an actual event (unless you're lying) that happened to you. As for the layout, there's no difference from your interpretation, because you wrote it to fit your interpretation. As you can see, your story is bassackwards, as is your interpretation. Yours reads as journal entries, not a story. When you actually tell the tale of your house to family and friends, you wouldn't tell it in this manner. As written we can't understand your narration without you providing the missing details. You just look like a poor writer.
The two stories are a few hundred years apart and the piecing together is a few hundred years later. The Redactor wanted the two independent stories to be seen as one. Chapter 5 is also evidence of the Redactor trying to mesh the stories together and associate the A&E story with the man created on day six.
Now if you can find in the Jewish oral tradition that there was a disaster and God started over, please show it. I haven't found such info in the legends. That and the Oral Law are where we would find the "rest of the story" so to speak.
Genesis 1 is not a journal.
quote:
You can determine from ICANT 1:1 that in 1995 I built a house.
You can determine from ICANT 2:1 and the history given the details of the house I built in 1995.
Actually, by itself, 2:1 doesn't tell us anything. It just refers us forward. That's why I said the who, whom, what, when and why are used for the whole piece not just one sentence. It's still about the purpose of the story for the audience, not you.
None of the Bible stories gives you the disaster you need to make your hypothesis work.

Scripture is like Newton’s third law of motionfor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words, for every biblical directive that exists, there is another scriptural mandate challenging it.
-- Carlene Cross in The Bible and Newton’s Third Law of Motion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 377 by ICANT, posted 06-24-2010 2:00 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 385 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2010 1:02 AM purpledawn has replied

JRTjr
Member (Idle past 4327 days)
Posts: 178
From: Houston, Texas, USA
Joined: 07-19-2004


Message 382 of 607 (566474)
06-24-2010 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 263 by ICANT
06-09-2010 10:00 PM


Re: A Question of Days
Dear ICant,
Thank you again, for your responses.
ICant writes:
In the original text bara' was not used concerning the sun, moon, and stars.
The Hebrew word bara' means: 1) to create, shape, form.
Forming is the act of bringing into existence.
You are absolutely correct; which shows me that you can put things into context. I have found many who refuse to take this simple step.
Thank you.
ICant writes:
if I am correct in what I have presented in this thread he died the same day that he was formed from the dust of the ground.
If he did not die that day God lied.
I would like to suggest here that you do some research on what God means when He speaks of ‘Death’. {I believe Luke 9: 60, Ephesians 2: 1, and Colossians 2:13 would be a good place to start.}
ICant writes:
These verses do not refer to the man that was formed from the dust of the ground before any other life form. Nor is it talking about the woman who was made from the rib of the man after all other life forms. This couple was placed in a garden. The man was forbidden from eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This is the man that was told he would die the day he ate the fruit.
I am not aware of an ‘Adam 2.0’ created after the first ‘Adam’ created by God.
If I am understanding your hypothesis correctly; you’re saying that we are descendants of ‘Adam 1.0’ {Genesis chapter one} and that ‘Adam 2.0’ {Genesis chapter two} physically died in the 24-hour ‘day’ that he eat from the tree that God told him not to. Correct?
If this is so, I have a few more questions for you.
If ‘Adam 2.0’ physically died in the 24-hour ‘day’ that he eat from the tree that God told him not to then why would God tell ‘Adam 2.0’ that, as part of his punishment for eating the forbidden fruit he would have to toil the ground All of the days of his life? {Genesis 3: 17}
It also accurse to me that the Bible states that sin came into the world through Adam’s sin.{Romans 5: 12} If ‘Adam 2.0’ physically died in the 24-hour ‘day’ that he eat from the tree that God told him not to then how was his sin transmitted?
Since Genesis is one document (not a collection of documents) would it not stand to reason that if a person is named in the beginning of the document that that name would refer to the same person throughout the text unless specifically stated otherwise?
Chapter three closes with ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve’ being kicked out of the Garden of Eden; chapter four starts with ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve’ having children. It seems obvious that these are the same ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve’; are they not?
There is more I would like to comment on in reply to your post but I am trying to keep my posts short and only deal with the primary subjects.
I pray I have given you food for thought; you certainly have given me many things to consider.
May God bless,
JRTjr

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by ICANT, posted 06-09-2010 10:00 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 386 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2010 3:03 AM JRTjr has replied

ramoss
Member (Idle past 634 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 383 of 607 (566486)
06-24-2010 9:56 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Peg
05-10-2010 8:29 PM


Re: Yom
Yes, evening and morning is to be taken literally. However, the story as a whole is to be taken as a parable.
I will also point out that the Jewish calender is a lunar calender, and the 'day' starts at sunset.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Peg, posted 05-10-2010 8:29 PM Peg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 384 by greentwiga, posted 06-24-2010 10:52 PM ramoss has not replied

greentwiga
Member (Idle past 3449 days)
Posts: 213
From: Santa
Joined: 06-05-2009


Message 384 of 607 (566491)
06-24-2010 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 383 by ramoss
06-24-2010 9:56 PM


Re: Yom
In Genesis 1 and 2, there are several definitions of "day" First, in Gen 1, the day is the evening and the morning. Next, in Gen 1:18, the Sun governs the day, ~12 hours. Then in Gen 2:4, This is the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord made earth and heaven. Now this account includes the creation of Adam and Eve. On day one of Gen 1, God created the Heavens and Earth. On day 6, God created man, yet Gen 2:4 lumps days 1 and 6 into one day. Not only that, this form is used all through Genesis (5:1, 10:1, 11:10, 11:27, 25:12, 25:19, 36:9) It always follows the descendants of the one mentioned. Gen 2:4 says one day covers generations and then covers Adam, Cain, and 6 further generations. The list typically covered people considered important. Women were almost always left out. Frequently brothers not in the lineage were left out. Sometimes generations were left out (look at the genealogy of David.) Thus the generations of the heavens and earth cover at least 8 generations and is listed as one day. God makes it clear that the days of Gen 1 must not be taken to mean 24 hour days.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 383 by ramoss, posted 06-24-2010 9:56 PM ramoss has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 387 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2010 3:17 AM greentwiga has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 385 of 607 (566501)
06-25-2010 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 381 by purpledawn
06-24-2010 5:21 PM


Re: Who, Whom, What, When, and Why
Hi PD,
purpledawn writes:
The difference is that you're recounting an actual event (unless you're lying) that happened to you. As for the layout, there's no difference from your interpretation, because you wrote it to fit your interpretation. As you can see, your story is bassackwards, as is your interpretation.
It was an actual event. Even my condo lost the roof and got all messed up but I did not build it.
So my story was arranged like I wanted it to be.
You are saying it would have made more sense if I had told it like this.
ICANT In 1995 I built a house.
This is the history of the house in the year I built the house.
The foundation was poured.
The foundation block was put in place and the inside was filled will fill.
The plumbing pipes were put in place, and the fill was leveled and prepared for the pouring of the slab.
The slab was poured and finished.
The blocks were laid and the lintel poured.
The trusses were set, the plywood applied and the roofing installed.
The framing was installed, dividing the house into 4 bedrooms 3 bathrooms 1 office 7 closets 1, 2 car garage and 1 screened porch the electrical installed, drywall applied and finished.
The painting done, fixtures and furnishing put in place.
The family moved in.
The house was in terrible unlivable shape.
I repaired the roof.
We cleaned the inside.
I replaced all the electrical wiring.
We replaced all the drywall.
We painted all the walls.
We replaced all the furnishings.
The house was finished and the family moved in.
Then I rested from all my work.
That is the way I think Genesis chapter 1 and 2 should read but your redactors or somebody decided it was one story and tried to make it look like one story.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 381 by purpledawn, posted 06-24-2010 5:21 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 388 by purpledawn, posted 06-25-2010 8:59 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 386 of 607 (566508)
06-25-2010 3:03 AM
Reply to: Message 382 by JRTjr
06-24-2010 7:59 PM


Re: A Question of Days
Hi JRTjr,
JRTjr writes:
I would like to suggest here that you do some research on what God means when He speaks of ‘Death’. {I believe Luke 9: 60, Ephesians 2: 1, and Colossians 2:13 would be a good place to start.}
I am very familiar with those verses.
Luke 9:60 Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach the kingdom of God.
Ephesians 2:1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
Colossians 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
Each of these is referring to mankind who is separated from God because the man formed from the dust of the ground that was placed in the Garden disobeyed a direct command of God and ate the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Because of his disobedience all mankind was separated from God, when God kicked the man out of the Garden.
Genesis 3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
What kind of death did God have the writer of Hebrews tell us that we all have to die. I think this is physical death.
Nobody has to die the second death because Jesus did that for them if they will only accept the free full pardon offered by God.
Revelation 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
The second death is eternal separation from God. And since mankind is already separated from God because of the sin of one man he must be born again to escape the penalty of the second death.
There is no escape from the penalty of the first death.
JRTjr writes:
I am not aware of an ‘Adam 2.0’ created after the first ‘Adam’ created by God.
There is no Adam 1.0 or 2.0.
There is a man formed from the dust of the ground that God breathed the breath of life into and that form became a living being. Genesis 2:7.
There is mankind that is created male and female in the image/likeness of God in Genesis 1:26, 27.
adam is the transliteration of the Hebrew word for mankind, or man. It is not a proper name like Cain or Abel.
The translators did not translate the Hebrew word they used the English letter equivalent of the Hebrew letter.
JRTjr writes:
If I am understanding your hypothesis correctly; you’re saying that we are descendants of ‘Adam 1.0’ {Genesis chapter one} and that ‘Adam 2.0’ {Genesis chapter two} physically died in the 24-hour ‘day’ that he eat from the tree that God told him not to. Correct?
My hypothesis as you call it goes like this.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
This day is a light period that ends in Genesis 1:2.
Day is determined by God's definition in:
Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
God called the light portion Day.
God called the dark portion Night.
God called the combination of the light that ended with evening and the morning which ended the dark period of Genesis 1:2 the first Day.
During the light portion of the day of Genesis the generations/history of the heavens and the earth was given in the verses that followed Genesis 2:4.
In Genesis 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
In Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul/being.
In Genesis 2:8 God planed a garden eastward in Eden and put the man there.
In Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
In Genesis 2:10-14 Tells us of a river that divides into 4 rivers.
In Genesis 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
In Genesis 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
In Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
In Genesis 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
In Genesis 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
In Genesis 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
In Genesis 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
In Genesis 3:1-6 Satan speaking through the serpent convinced the woman she would become as God by eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
She then gave to the man and he did eat.
Then we have the blame somebody else game begin.
God chased them out of the garden.
In Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
4:2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
In Genesis 4:3 And in process 7093 of time 3117 it came to pass, that Cain 7014 brought 935 of the fruit 6529 of the ground 127 an offering 4503 unto the LORD 3068.
Strongs numbers are provided so you can look up the words and definitions for yourself.
Hebrew word qets which means end is translated "And in process" 7093.
Many think this process is days, weeks, or months. That's not supported.
Hebrew word yowm which God defined as a light period or the combination of a light period and a dark period is translated "of time" 3117.
In Genesis 4:8 And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
In Genesis 4:17-24 We have the generations of the man formed from the dust of the ground through his firstborn son Cain.
There is no ages given for anyone.
There was no way to tell time as it was just existence in a light period that ended in the evening found in Genesis 1:2.
Couple that evening with the dark period that ended with morning God declared that the first Day.
Beginning at Genesis 1:3 we have the restoration of the earth as found in Genesis 1:2 that it might be inhabited again by mankind.
In the following verses we have great whales created in Genesis 1:21.
We have mankind created in Genesis 1:27.
Everything else was brought forth after their kind and the vegetation from the seed that was on the ground after their kind.
JRTjr writes:
If ‘Adam 2.0’ physically died in the 24-hour ‘day’ that he eat from the tree that God told him not to then why would God tell ‘Adam 2.0’ that, as part of his punishment for eating the forbidden fruit he would have to toil the ground All of the days of his life? {Genesis 3: 17}
yowm a masculine noun is not plural. The markings that make it plural was not added until somewhere between 600 AD and 1000 AD.
JRTjr writes:
It also accurse to me that the Bible states that sin came into the world through Adam’s sin.{Romans 5: 12} If ‘Adam 2.0’ physically died in the 24-hour ‘day’ that he eat from the tree that God told him not to then how was his sin transmitted?
Why does it have to be transmitted?
Sin is not inheritable.
And yes by one man sin entered into the universe. The penalty for that sin is death.
And yes man was separated from God by the man eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
This man did not have the knowledge of good and evil until he ate the fruit and his eyes was opened to evil. This man was not created in the image/likeness of God. Had he been he would have had the knowledge of good and evil.
Genesis 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
Man had become like God, knowing good and evil.
When he ate the fruit God had to drive him out of the garden lest he eat of the tree of life and live forever with sin in his members.
JRTjr writes:
I pray I have given you food for thought; you certainly have given me many things to consider.
You supplied a fantastic piece of information. I have been arguing that the man formed from the dust was not created in the image/likeness of God and it became clear why the Holy Spirit had put those thoughts in my mind as I typed this post to you.
Had the man formed from the dust of the ground been in the image/likeness of God he would have known good and evil. He would not have become like God knowing good and evil.
So thanks for the food.
I think that was the last piece of the puzzle that I needed.
God Bless you and yours,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 382 by JRTjr, posted 06-24-2010 7:59 PM JRTjr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 430 by JRTjr, posted 06-30-2010 11:47 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 387 of 607 (566510)
06-25-2010 3:17 AM
Reply to: Message 384 by greentwiga
06-24-2010 10:52 PM


Re: Yom
Hi greentwiga,
greentwiga writes:
Thus the generations of the heavens and earth cover at least 8 generations and is listed as one day.
Why couldn't the 8 generations of people in the generations of the heavens and the earth take place in one day?
God defined day as a light period.
If there was no night in existence would it not be the Day.
The day the Heaven and the Earth was created did not cease from the beginning until we find evening at Genesis 1:2 which coupled with the dark period that closed with the morning which God declared the first Day.
You ask how long was that light period? There is no way of knowing. It could have been some 13 to 20 billion years in our time but in eternity it was just one great big now.
God bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 384 by greentwiga, posted 06-24-2010 10:52 PM greentwiga has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 394 by greentwiga, posted 06-25-2010 11:05 AM ICANT has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 388 of 607 (566545)
06-25-2010 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 385 by ICANT
06-25-2010 1:02 AM


Re: Who, Whom, What, When, and Why
quote:
It was an actual event. Even my condo lost the roof and got all messed up but I did not build it.
So my story was arranged like I wanted it to be.
But you arranged it to mirror your hypothesis interpretation. If you recounted the event to friends and family, you wouldn't write it or tell it in that fashion. Oral stories have to be interesting to be remembered. Yours would not be told around the campfire.
quote:
You are saying it would have made more sense if I had told it like this.
No, it still doesn't make sense. The disaster is left out. That's the event that ties the two together. You're still writing it like a journal.
quote:
That is the way I think Genesis chapter 1 and 2 should read but your redactors or somebody decided it was one story and tried to make it look like one story.
No, the stories should be read as they appear in the book. The Redactor didn't decide it was one story. The Redactor put the two together and wrote some linking sentences to make the stories seem related. The Redactor couldn't leave out the Genesis 1 story because it speaks of the Sabbath. The A&E story told people why things were the way they were. He had a mixture of the Northern and Southern kingdoms. He was trying to blend the two sides.
According to Richard Elliott Friedman in the book "Who Wrote The Bible?", the Priestly writer wrote his version of the J&E stories. Just like we have Bible stories written in current vernacular and embellished to present lessons to our current culture.
Unfortunately, you are adding a disaster that has no support in the Bible or science from what I know.
The purpose of the Genesis 1 story is a setup for the Sabbath Law and it emphasizes that God created all things.
The purpose of the earlier A&E story was to explain why things are the way they are. A just-so-story.
The Redactor's purpose was to blend the two.
What is your purpose?
What are you trying to tell your audience?
I see no useful purpose for your hypothesis.

Scripture is like Newton’s third law of motionfor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words, for every biblical directive that exists, there is another scriptural mandate challenging it.
-- Carlene Cross in The Bible and Newton’s Third Law of Motion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 385 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2010 1:02 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2010 10:12 AM purpledawn has replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 389 of 607 (566551)
06-25-2010 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 347 by ICANT
06-23-2010 2:19 AM


Re: Satan
I said he would be tormented forever. There will be no one to deceive, tempt, and no accusations to make before God.
How could a programmed being torment itself, what woud be the point. When the plan for Satan has expired why would not he expire as well, wouldnt his purpose have been served, since he was created for a specific purpose.
So he goes on eternally to think about what he had no choice and control over in th first place. Why would a programmed being worry or think about anything.
So God creates a being for a specific purpose, then has him going on eternally to think about what he cannot do and its NOT TORTURE by Gods hand
Does that make sense to you?
You are way to smart an individual to believe such things
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 347 by ICANT, posted 06-23-2010 2:19 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 390 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2010 9:53 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 390 of 607 (566555)
06-25-2010 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 389 by Dawn Bertot
06-25-2010 9:35 AM


Re: Satan
Hi DB,
Dawn Bertot writes:
Does that make sense to you?
There are a lot of things that don't make sense to me.
One is why an omnipotent God allows His Word to be changed by mankind.
He is omnipotent and could cause the Word to come out of the presses like He said it regardless of what is input by humans.
That would really shake up the apple cart wouldn't it?
Dawn Bertot writes:
You are way to smart an individual to believe such things
Well I believe a person can go to Heaven just because he takes God at His Word and trusts Him for salvation, without ever being a member of the church or being baptized or doing one good work of anykind.
You can't get much further out than that. About 95% of so called christianity disagrees with me. So What?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by Dawn Bertot, posted 06-25-2010 9:35 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 391 by Dawn Bertot, posted 06-25-2010 10:10 AM ICANT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024