Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Annunaki Theory
shannonavery
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 42 (98119)
04-06-2004 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Spencer
03-16-2004 12:35 AM


When you say that the Annunaki 'told people' to search the net...does that mean there are some of them still here? I'm new, so forgive me if this has been covered before. I'm not usually a believer in things like this, but I recently had an odd experience while on a business trip to New Orleans. I met a person who told me some very strange things and proceeded to back them up with data and emphirical fact. I've been searching the net to try and understand what I experienced and this topic seems the most similar to what I was told.
Has anyone ever met an Annunaki (or some agent acting on their behalf)?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Spencer, posted 03-16-2004 12:35 AM Spencer has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Gary, posted 04-13-2004 1:50 AM shannonavery has replied
 Message 19 by salmondine, posted 04-17-2004 2:15 AM shannonavery has replied

  
shannonavery
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 42 (101279)
04-20-2004 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Gary
04-13-2004 1:50 AM


I'm a bit embarassed because, as I said, I am usally a rationalist (no offense). But I spent nearly all night talking to this person and I am convinced that she wasn't human. Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe she was. Though, in the course of my work, I have interviewed many mentally ill people and there was nothing in this "woman's" manner to indicated that she was in any way mentally impaired.
Basically, she told me that she was a member of a completely separate intelligent species. She never came out and said it quite like that, but she described in considerable detail (I have seven notebooks of notes from that night!) her life and her 'people': their culture, phliosophies, technology, etc. I only understood a small fraction of it at the time, since my background is in political science and she talked like someone with a PHD in physics, biology, economics, and music all rolled into one. Since then, I have spoken to a few sources who are experts in the above mentioned fields and others. I didn't tell them why I was asking (for fear they would laugh me out of the room) or where I got the information, but across the board, they all said that the infoirmation I gave them was consistant with the very latest advances and theories in their respective fields. They also admitted that much of it was beyond their comprehension, though it did seem to follow logically from what they understood.
She mentioned Annunaki in the course of the conversation, which is why I'm here. From what I gathered, she herself was not Annunaki, but some sort of cousin to them. I think she was referring to both her own group and the Annunaki as two social sub-sets of the same genetic species.
I would definately like any imput anyone can give, especially if anyone has had similar personal experiences. I would be interesting (not to mention comforting to my sanity!) to see if the information is consistent across several sources.
Thanks,
Shannon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Gary, posted 04-13-2004 1:50 AM Gary has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by coffee_addict, posted 04-20-2004 4:34 PM shannonavery has replied
 Message 35 by randman, posted 06-10-2008 6:12 PM shannonavery has not replied

  
shannonavery
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 42 (101280)
04-20-2004 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by salmondine
04-17-2004 2:15 AM


Re: St. germain
Thanks! I definately will check it out. Your description of St. Germain's long life is consistant with my notes. This 'woman' claimed to be over a hundred years old, though she looked about 20.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by salmondine, posted 04-17-2004 2:15 AM salmondine has not replied

  
shannonavery
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 42 (101871)
04-22-2004 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by coffee_addict
04-20-2004 4:34 PM


I'm a little senisitive about giving out my notes right now--I'm thinking of writing a book if I can get any solid coroberation (I too am a skeptic). But if you have specific questions, I can respond, though I don't always understand my own notes. SOme of the info I got was quite scientific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by coffee_addict, posted 04-20-2004 4:34 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
shannonavery
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 42 (101875)
04-22-2004 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by coffee_addict
04-21-2004 8:59 PM


Re: shannonavery
I don't know anything about a lost planet. My source seemed to have lived all of her life on earth and she never insinuated she was any kind of alien, so maybe she isn't Annunaki at all. Maybe she was just some kind of physics savant who delighted in messing with people's heads.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by coffee_addict, posted 04-21-2004 8:59 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Gary, posted 04-25-2004 9:38 PM shannonavery has replied

  
shannonavery
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 42 (105292)
05-04-2004 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Gary
04-25-2004 9:38 PM


Re: shannonavery
She talked a lot about the way "her people" experienced the world differently...that the goal of human has been survival through most of our evolution, but that that her people solved the basics of survival long ago and have been concentrating on improvement of the species. They have a very mathematical view of the world, but this didn't seem to preclude them (at least the one I spoke to) from being passionate, compassionate, or emotionally in touch with themselves. In other words, they weren't Mr. Spock of anything.
She spoke of mathematical concepts that were beyond my understanding, various "dimentions," though she stressed that her people has a different understanding of that word. She gossiped about her family, which was apparently one of some importance within thier social structure. She repeatedly made comments like "you are close to understanding, but not there" when I brought up things like decomocracy and the environmental movement in defense of my own species. She seemed torn between affection for humans and a sort of condescending annoynace at us.
The overall tone of her conversation was almost new age--that everything is connected and our actions influence the entire universe. But she didn't talk about a "great light" or meditation or anything. The language was almost all scientific.
Hope this helps. I'll pick through my notes and try to find a specifc topic to tell you more about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Gary, posted 04-25-2004 9:38 PM Gary has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024