Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5895 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: 01-09-2002
|
|
Message 4 of 24 (12139)
06-25-2002 3:27 AM
|
Reply to: Message 3 by nator
06-24-2002 1:28 PM
|
|
Schraf: I keep asking a similar question concerning Dembski's specified complexity. To wit: How does the EF differentiate between "apparent" specified complexity (i.e., naturally occurring) and "true" specified complexity (i.e., design)? The supposed answer deals with the probability of occurance - but without knowing the causal history, the only way to distinguish the two is deciding in advance that something is designed. Tautology in action, IMO.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 3 by nator, posted 06-24-2002 1:28 PM | | nator has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2