Setterfield's Multi-catastrophe model

I have now posted his model along with my comments at:
http://gondwanaresearch.com/hp/set.htmYou'll note that his ideas are both extra-biblical and an excellent example of pseudoscientific rationalization.CheersJoe Meert http://gondwanaresearch.com/hp/credocs.htm

quote:

---

Originally posted by Joe Meert:
I have now posted his model along with my comments at:
http://gondwanaresearch.com/hp/set.htm

​

You'll note that his ideas are both extra-biblical and an excellent example of pseudoscientific rationalization.

​

Cheers

​

Joe Meert

​

http://gondwanaresearch.com/hp/credocs.htm

---

Thanks for the review, Joe. It's gonna take some time to digest all of this...

Helen needs it both ways. She wants the crew of the ark to witness flesh being burnt off bodies, plus be far enough away in order not to be affected themselves. First she says:

quote:

---

there are memories of people left behind being scalded by the hot waster. Memories are recorded that both the water that fell from above and the waters which exploded upwards burned the flesh off bodies and dissolved the land. Noah, his wife, or some member of the family on the Ark must have seen the beginnings of this horror.

---

Then later:

quote:

---

As a side note, it might be mentioned that when all of this is considered, Noah probably was not building his Ark near the coast, but inland, away from the geologically active areas that would later explode so devastatingly. There is no other way the Ark and its population could have survived the scalding, exploding waters.

---

I wonder how this would be explained?

quote:

---

Originally posted by R. Planet:
Helen needs it both ways. She wants the crew of the ark to witness flesh being burnt off bodies, plus be far enough away in order not to be affected themselves. First she says:

​

I wonder how this would be explained?

​

---

JM: Good point, I'll note that in the page.CheersJoe Meert

pushing to see TB/TC's commentsCheersJoe Meert