Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,793 Year: 4,050/9,624 Month: 921/974 Week: 248/286 Day: 9/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "THE EXODUS REVEALED" VIDEO
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 453 of 860 (128483)
07-28-2004 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 452 by Hydarnes
07-28-2004 8:51 PM


Re: Why has a Ron Wyatt fraud got 400+ posts.
Film producers????
What's that mean to be evidence of?
That's you will never go broke underestimating the stupidity of the public?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 452 by Hydarnes, posted 07-28-2004 8:51 PM Hydarnes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 455 by Hydarnes, posted 07-28-2004 9:16 PM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 456 of 860 (128487)
07-28-2004 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 455 by Hydarnes
07-28-2004 9:16 PM


Re: Why has a Ron Wyatt fraud got 400+ posts.
That's based on a proper quote - anyone remember it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 455 by Hydarnes, posted 07-28-2004 9:16 PM Hydarnes has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 486 by lfen, posted 07-29-2004 11:30 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 466 of 860 (128583)
07-29-2004 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 465 by Hydarnes
07-29-2004 10:22 AM


Re: Picture
How about two or three - just the author and the peer-reviewed journal will be fine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 465 by Hydarnes, posted 07-29-2004 10:22 AM Hydarnes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 468 by Hydarnes, posted 07-29-2004 10:33 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 469 of 860 (128588)
07-29-2004 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 467 by Hydarnes
07-29-2004 10:31 AM


Re: Why has a Ron Wyatt fraud got 400+ posts.
This isn't even to mention that when you examine the entire scheme of events that there is something of significance connected with these finds.
I always struggle to see how you leap from A to C as you seem to be suggesting with this post. Where is your evidence linking those matters?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 467 by Hydarnes, posted 07-29-2004 10:31 AM Hydarnes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 472 by Hydarnes, posted 07-29-2004 10:45 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 480 of 860 (128601)
07-29-2004 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 479 by Hydarnes
07-29-2004 11:02 AM


Re: Picture
So you are basically admitting with that post that your theory is bollocks?
Frankly I've not seen anything conclusive from either side on this matter.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 07-29-2004 10:14 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 479 by Hydarnes, posted 07-29-2004 11:02 AM Hydarnes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 482 by Hydarnes, posted 07-29-2004 11:21 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 520 of 860 (129105)
07-31-2004 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 519 by Trae
07-31-2004 9:45 AM


Re: I am not doing wheelies over the so-called evidence.
The crux of the argument (at the moment) seems to be the existance of those wheels - Buzz can you do a summary of your evidence for their existance?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 519 by Trae, posted 07-31-2004 9:45 AM Trae has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 521 by Buzsaw, posted 07-31-2004 11:04 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 539 of 860 (129397)
08-01-2004 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 538 by JimSDA
08-01-2004 7:19 PM


Re: Picture
Tomorrow! it's cream for you all TOMORROW!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 538 by JimSDA, posted 08-01-2004 7:19 PM JimSDA has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 540 by JimSDA, posted 08-01-2004 7:34 PM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 542 of 860 (129403)
08-01-2004 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 540 by JimSDA
08-01-2004 7:34 PM


Re: Picture
Thanks for the reply - I'm sure the believers (and even a few atheists like me) on here will be very interested to take a look at your site.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 540 by JimSDA, posted 08-01-2004 7:34 PM JimSDA has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 591 of 860 (129516)
08-02-2004 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 554 by jar
08-01-2004 10:12 PM


Re: Classic argument from authority when you have no facts
I work with the most cited author in the information sciences - that does not make me the most cited author in the information systems - that's a quite sad "appeal to authority".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 554 by jar, posted 08-01-2004 10:12 PM jar has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 592 of 860 (129517)
08-02-2004 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 589 by PaulK
08-02-2004 8:31 AM


Re: Why has a Ron Wyatt fraud got 400+ posts.
the "Molecular Frequency Generator" is just another name for the old Hieronymous machine. It doesn't work. Regardless of whatever pseudo-scientific explanations you happen to bring up.
What the hell is that suppose to do? This is a wind-up,no?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 589 by PaulK, posted 08-02-2004 8:31 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 593 by PaulK, posted 08-02-2004 9:56 AM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 611 of 860 (129557)
08-02-2004 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 593 by PaulK
08-02-2004 9:56 AM


Re: Why has a Ron Wyatt fraud got 400+ posts.
paulk writes:
Here's an advert for one.
Needless to say I don't recommend buying.
Good lord! I've seen some crackpot things in my time but that takes the biscuit!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 593 by PaulK, posted 08-02-2004 9:56 AM PaulK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 612 of 860 (129558)
08-02-2004 12:26 PM
Reply to: Message 608 by Ron Lambert
08-02-2004 12:16 PM


Re: C14 dating...
And do you have any evidence from a real journal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 608 by Ron Lambert, posted 08-02-2004 12:16 PM Ron Lambert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 616 by Ron Lambert, posted 08-02-2004 12:46 PM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 621 of 860 (129573)
08-02-2004 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 616 by Ron Lambert
08-02-2004 12:46 PM


Re: C14 dating...
What a lot of old jism!
ron writes:
Charles, Creation Research Society Quarterly is a peer-reviewed journal produced by real, actual, living, breathing scientists who are creationists. They do exist. They provide solid evidence that is documented, testable, and verifiable.
How many journal ask you to agree with statements like:
The Bible is the written Word of God, and because it is inspired throughout, all its assertions are historically and scientifically true in the original autographs. To the student of nature this means that the account of origins in Genesis is a factual presentation of simple historical truths.
All basic types of living things, including man, were made by direct creative acts of God during the Creation Week described in Genesis. Whatever biological changes have occurred since Creation Week have accomplished only changes within the original created kinds.
How can you do science when you have already decided on the answer! What a load of old rubbish!
Can you name me ONE real journal that requires you to agree to a statement of belief?
The charter of the Smithsonian Institution says that it is dedicated to promoting the theory of evolution. Should we disregard anything contained in Smithsonian publications, because of the plainly announced bias?
So what? it's not a peer-reviewed journal, last time I checked it's an insititution - you are trying to compare apples to oranges.
Why is this earth-shattering material not submitted to other journals? GOSH let me guess there is a secret plan to hide all the evidence!
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-02-2004 12:01 PM
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-02-2004 12:13 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 616 by Ron Lambert, posted 08-02-2004 12:46 PM Ron Lambert has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024