|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: "THE EXODUS REVEALED" VIDEO | |||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Film producers????
What's that mean to be evidence of? That's you will never go broke underestimating the stupidity of the public?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
That's based on a proper quote - anyone remember it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
How about two or three - just the author and the peer-reviewed journal will be fine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
This isn't even to mention that when you examine the entire scheme of events that there is something of significance connected with these finds.
I always struggle to see how you leap from A to C as you seem to be suggesting with this post. Where is your evidence linking those matters?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
So you are basically admitting with that post that your theory is bollocks?
Frankly I've not seen anything conclusive from either side on this matter. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 07-29-2004 10:14 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
The crux of the argument (at the moment) seems to be the existance of those wheels - Buzz can you do a summary of your evidence for their existance?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Tomorrow! it's cream for you all TOMORROW!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Thanks for the reply - I'm sure the believers (and even a few atheists like me) on here will be very interested to take a look at your site.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
I work with the most cited author in the information sciences - that does not make me the most cited author in the information systems - that's a quite sad "appeal to authority".
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
the "Molecular Frequency Generator" is just another name for the old Hieronymous machine. It doesn't work. Regardless of whatever pseudo-scientific explanations you happen to bring up. What the hell is that suppose to do? This is a wind-up,no?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
paulk writes: Here's an advert for one. Needless to say I don't recommend buying. Good lord! I've seen some crackpot things in my time but that takes the biscuit!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
And do you have any evidence from a real journal?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4154 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
What a lot of old jism!
ron writes: Charles, Creation Research Society Quarterly is a peer-reviewed journal produced by real, actual, living, breathing scientists who are creationists. They do exist. They provide solid evidence that is documented, testable, and verifiable. How many journal ask you to agree with statements like: The Bible is the written Word of God, and because it is inspired throughout, all its assertions are historically and scientifically true in the original autographs. To the student of nature this means that the account of origins in Genesis is a factual presentation of simple historical truths. All basic types of living things, including man, were made by direct creative acts of God during the Creation Week described in Genesis. Whatever biological changes have occurred since Creation Week have accomplished only changes within the original created kinds. How can you do science when you have already decided on the answer! What a load of old rubbish! Can you name me ONE real journal that requires you to agree to a statement of belief?
The charter of the Smithsonian Institution says that it is dedicated to promoting the theory of evolution. Should we disregard anything contained in Smithsonian publications, because of the plainly announced bias? So what? it's not a peer-reviewed journal, last time I checked it's an insititution - you are trying to compare apples to oranges. Why is this earth-shattering material not submitted to other journals? GOSH let me guess there is a secret plan to hide all the evidence! This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-02-2004 12:01 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-02-2004 12:13 PM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024