"The Exodus Revealed" Video II

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GONG!! No NT, but if you think we are, go ahead and post silly stuff. It's entertaining and gives us a break from being so serious all the time. This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-08-2004 02:01 AM

I know there's just too much to remember in all this, but it's been explained several times that after the coral had formed the wood would've rotted away, unless the wheel had been buried in the sand and relatively recently eroded to the bottom surface. It's not like under the coral there's this pristine wood wheel. The hard coral shell is likely all that remains. The gold gilted one, of course was not coral encrusted since the coral would not cling to it.

Asgara, science includes lab, but has much more to it than lab. This's just not true that there's no science in Moller's book, exploration and research. C'mon, please get real and be reasonable. Imo the extremity of your bias is showing here. I can do science at my home, for cryin out loud and don't need a degree to do it.

Whata heck is the big rush to close this thread about? Jim's only one of us. We got our other one cropped and now there's this apparant desire to shut this one down. Why? Why don't you treat it like other threads and let it die off itself as traffic wanes?

Following whose established method? There are many, depending on what you are studying, where you are, what you have to work with and so forth. Get your dictionary out and argue with it. Mine says science is "knowledge derived from observation, study, and experimentation carried on in order to determine the nature or principles of what is being studied." According to this definition, experimentation or lab is just as I said, only one aspect of science.Btw, have you read the book?

I had a "fatal error" on my screen when I posted my last post and thought I lost it. I redid it but see the other one took, so editing out post here.This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-08-2004 11:11 PM

I wondered when our brilliant prof would show up to contribute his expertise in sarcasm. I knew it was about that time. Hi, prof. I think I heard you mother calling again.

Gotta run for now. Up til 2 a.m posting this a m and can't do that every night and work next day.

OK bud. Sorry. I'll not alude to that again.This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-08-2004 11:33 PM

Thanks for sharing that, Eta. (gulp) Peace, and have a good night.

Eta, who cares whether they're farmers, business men or lab tecs. What matters is whether they have the goods pertaining to the topic. Why don;t you learn to do forums instead of the only thing you seem to do, i.e. nitpic, complain, namecall, insult and harass. Why don't you either contribute something constructive to the thread or go fishing, mow your lawn, read a book or something?

To say there's not a shread of evidence, Charles, proves that no amount of evidence would make a bit of difference to you. Your mind is set and made up. The majority of your input is hollering for more evidence all the while the evidence is being presented. No, it's not all proved, but neither is the alleged evidence for evolution proved. This's why nobody cares to debate you. It's a futility trip.

The shape of the boulder, position of the split and appearance of a split rather than erosion. It looks like a waterflow little dry creek bed of sorts. It is mainly significant because of the wheels and other corroborating evidence pertaining to the Biblical record. If it existed elsewhere it would be unique, but especially here because of it's significance. This has been covered elsewhere so please don't bug me for more on it. Get the video if you want more.As for post 90's yada I see nothing in it of significance that has not been covered.

See Charles, this's a good example of what I mean about you. This's typical of the way you operate, rarely contributing anything of substance to the discussion, all the while heckling and harassing those who are contributing with this bogus nonesense about them doing nothing. If creos operated like you do on science and other threads, we'd be run outa town or restricted to FFA by admin.

Chuck, Charlie, Charles, maboy, I've lost track of how many times you've blessed us all with this typical post begging for more lab stuff. What you've got is what you're getting until more is done. Lab isn't the only criteria for evidence. As I said, argue with the dictionary on that. You're useless humdrum to this thread, and most you participate in is like the constant drip from a worn out faucet.

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz