IOW, you are assuming the atheist trump card position: Assert no evidence at all to exist because there is nothing to gain for your worldview and everything to lose.
"Pharaoh, king over Egypt" should really be read as "Zedekiah".
Nobody claimed this intentionally misquoted nonsense by you.
Every atheist in this one sided debate offered the exact same "refutation" through-out: "What evidence ?" = silent admission to the evidence clearly supporting the claims. These facts once seen are then chosen to not be recognized and instantly treated like they don't exist.
This exposes you to be loyal to your worldview regardless of the evidence which is fine - except for the fact that you claim to be a truth-seeker driven only by facts.
For the record: "Pharoah" in the Irish annals is the title of a king and that persons daughter according to the Bible and archaeology originated out from Egypt. These persons in the Bible and archaeology are Jeremiah and Zedekiah's daughter as the Irish race and their annals are certainly speaking of a fair skinned princess ruddy in description which is the exact description given to David in the Bible.
You perfectly understand all this but refuse to acknowledge it for the reasons stated above. This is not at all complicated unlike obscure fossils and such which your kind have no problem declaring to be transitional = proof of your bias despite the evidence.
The ruddy Irish race descended from ruddy David.
The British Isles fulfill every promise given to 10 tribe Israel, David, and Abraham.
Thomas Paine and Ingersoll the Great Atheist both based their lack of faith on the fact about the British Isles mentioned above. They mistakenly THOUGHT the Jews were promised these promises and mistakenly THOUGHT that all Hebrews were Jews.
The title of this topic and evidence thereof completely exposed the falsehood of those terribly wrong assumptions.