Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 108 (8806 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 12-16-2017 6:03 AM
264 online now:
PaulK, Tangle (2 members, 262 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Post Volume:
Total: 824,305 Year: 28,911/21,208 Month: 977/1,847 Week: 352/475 Day: 15/102 Hour: 0/0

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Meyer's Hopeless Monster
Posts: 4000
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 3.0

Message 185 of 207 (182871)
02-03-2005 11:40 AM

A response to Sternberg's accusations against the Smithsonian
Well, the WSJ: The Branding of a Heretic isn't open for replies, so I guess this is the best place to put it.

Jonathan Coddington (Research Scientist and Curator at the National Museum of Natural History, and Richard Sternberg's sponsor/supervisor as a Research Associate at the Smithsonian) has posted a response to Richard Sternberg's complaint of discrimination (see The Branding of a Heretic) at The Panda's Thumb in this comment in the Sternberg vs. Smithsonian thread.

6. As for prejudice on the basis of beliefs or opinions, I repeatedly and consistently emphasized to staff (and to Dr. von Sternberg personally), verbally or in writing, that private beliefs and/or controversial editorial decisions were irrelevant in the workplace, that we would continue to provide full Research Associate benefits to Dr. von Sternberg, that he was an established and respected scientist, and that he would at all times be treated as such.
On behalf of all National Museum of Natural History staff, I would like to assert that we hold the freedoms of religion and belief as dearly as any one. The right to heterodox opinion is particularly important to scientists. Why Dr. von Sternberg chose to represent his interactions with me as he did is mystifying. I canít speak to his interactions with anyone else.

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by Percy, posted 02-03-2005 3:55 PM JonF has responded
 Message 189 by Brad McFall, posted 02-08-2005 2:36 PM JonF has not yet responded
 Message 190 by Percy, posted 02-10-2005 10:41 AM JonF has not yet responded

Posts: 4000
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 3.0

Message 187 of 207 (182920)
02-03-2005 4:23 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Percy
02-03-2005 3:55 PM

Re: A response to Sternberg's accusations against the Smithsonian
Sternberg's position and privileges have not been curtailed in any way (according to Coddington). Perhaps his peers are not as chummy as they used to be, but chumminess is not guaranteed by the Constitution or any law of which I'm aware.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Percy, posted 02-03-2005 3:55 PM Percy has not yet responded

Posts: 4000
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 3.0

Message 200 of 207 (234623)
08-18-2005 6:11 PM

OSC has dropped Sternberg's complaint: no jurisdiction
Since Sternberg is not actually an employee of the Smithsonian, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel has concluded it does not have jurisdiction. More discussion on The Panda's Thumb at Sternberg complaint dismissed.
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017