Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,863 Year: 4,120/9,624 Month: 991/974 Week: 318/286 Day: 39/40 Hour: 5/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Working Definition of God
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 172 of 332 (200895)
04-21-2005 7:32 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by Phat
04-21-2005 5:00 AM


Re: To Whom are you asking this question?
quote:
Think about this, however! If God does own all of the evidence, He has apparently put evidence that is not conclusive at all. Perhaps He wishes that humanity approach the topic as if no conclusion is evident.
Then he has only himself to blame for our lack of belief.
This essentially posits god as the deceiver. If he is a deceiver, why should I take all the statements about his love at face value?
And of course, this frees me from any obligation or expectation to be a christian, read the bible, or attend church. God has to take responsibility for failing to declare himself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Phat, posted 04-21-2005 5:00 AM Phat has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024