|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,818 Year: 4,075/9,624 Month: 946/974 Week: 273/286 Day: 34/46 Hour: 6/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Validity of differing eyewitness accounts in religious texts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Once again, the bible CANNOT verify itself. perhaps this is going to found dumb, but why not? we can tell what books were written with knowledge of other books. so when kings and chronicles say the same thing, no it's not verifaction. neither is it when luke and mark say the same thing. but at the end of the day, the bible is a collection of books, not just one. and the books in it are collections too. and the evidence is that they were NOT rectified against each other in the editorial and redactory process. so the fact that they agree AT ALL is sometimes suprising.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Not too bright there. I meant that YOU, personally, can't, and others of your general mental persuasion, not that ONE can't. I certainly can. I consider it easy to tell, for anybody with the basic smarts, feeling for character, etc.
quote: We have a big disagreement here of course, since I consider your attacks on the Bible to be an example of the same problem I attribute to Mark24, an inability to judge authenticity, and a reliance on inappropriate tools for the job of judging the Bible.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5222 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Arachnophopbia,
I was speaking specifically about Moses & the Red Sea parting, rather than the entire bible. We can only conclude that Moses saw the Red Sea part if we accept that Moses saw the Red Sea part. There is no other way of verifying the text. We are forced to accept it on faith. Mark
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
yeah, but this is a rather simple question of the ability to identify what is and what is not history, and what is and what is not witness testimony.
you claim the bible is authentic. and i agree, it's absolutely authentic for what it is, for the most part. we just disagree on what it is. i think it's what it appears to be: a book collected by hebrew people between the years of about 900bc to 200bc, and from 60 to 100ad by a different group of people, both regarding their traditions, partices, beliefs, and sometimes history. i'm not sure what you seem to think it is. but it is greivous error to think that what we have on our bed-side tables is an accurate compliation of stories by the people who were there. this is not an inability to judge authenticity on my part. i'm very familiar with the history, context, and structure of the collection. but you seem to be attributing some kind of false authenticity to it, making it more than it is. so that even (as with the other debate) mistranslations and changed meanings of words are divinely guided so that the things that are so obviously wrong somehow become right. what sort of inappropriate tools am i using, exactly? reading comprehension and logic? the bible itself? i've only once here held it up to archaeology, in a case that proved a point that should have been obvious from reading the text alone: that kings is biased in favor of judah. you never answered that argument, btw, which rather conclusive showed that bits unfavourable to the bias were left out. but mostly, i'm just looking at what the text itself says. and if the bible is an inappropriate tool for judging the bible... well, i don't know where to begin. so let's start this whole moses bit over again. tell me, what specifically makes the moses account more of a factual, eyewitness testimony, than say -- goldilocks and the three bears? no, seriously. millions of people can pretty accurately recite both stories. both are told as factual accounts, from non-present third person narration. both are refered to about the same way. amazing stuff happens in both (talking bears that live in houses). both are part of a cultural mythology, and the facts would seem to indicate that both stories are somewhat fictional. now, i like to believe that moses was a real person, but that goldilocks was not. but, logically, what reason do i have to believe in either?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5222 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Faith,
I attribute to Mark24, an inability to judge authenticity, and a reliance on inappropriate tools for the job of judging the Bible. So how do I tell "real history" with a genuine eyewitness, from a myth purporting itself to be fact with a fictional eyewitness? What innappropriate tools of the job am I using, exactly, to judge the authenticity of the Moses account of the Red Sea parting? There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
I was speaking specifically about Moses & the Red Sea parting, rather than the entire bible. We can only conclude that Moses saw the Red Sea part if we accept that Moses saw the Red Sea part. There is no other way of verifying the text. We are forced to accept it on faith. well, it's recorded as moses being part of the cause. it would be a little more convincing as wtiness testimony if perhaps, i dunno, moses had chosen to write the story himself in first person. however, in this instance, you are correct. after something like this becomes part of the cultural mythology, it's absolutely impossible for anything that refers to the cultural mythology to be considered verification of the factuality. for instance, if i were to write that "the last song the string quartet played on the titanic as it sunk was 'nearer my god to thee,'" i'm not verifying that fact. i'm repeating the cultural mythology. maybe at one point i even watched the movie "titanic" or any number of other titanic movies that feature this commonly told myth. did it happen that way? *shrugs* nobody really knows, apparently. and i'm pretty sure there are still some eyewitnesses alive too. This message has been edited by Arachnophilia, 05-04-2005 04:01 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Given a document of unclear age or provenance giving descriptions of events that cannot be matched to other knowledge how can we take it as repesenting "witness testimony" when it could easily have been written centuries after the real events, if it was indeed based more than loosely on any actual events ? The fact that so many have testified to the authenticity of this document for 3500 years, starting with those who were THERE at the TIME, means NOTHING to you, does it? You won't find anything like that for any other document in existence but you think your ponderings at such a great distance trump everything that came before, and this despite the fact that such ponderings don't have a great record of surviving archaeological discoveries that so often validate the Bible instead. The INTELLIGENT thing to do would be to distrust your PRESENT historical knowledge or put it on hold because of this massive testimony to the contrary, rather than putting such paltry current investigations on such a high pedestal. This message has been edited by Faith, 05-04-2005 11:33 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Just a reminder. Faith is not being held to the forum guidelines as long as she only posts in one thread at a time, which for now is this one. Please do not run afoul of the guidelines by responding in kind. --Admin You can't tell real history from fiction, a genuine witness report from a hoax.
quote: Just found this other record of your inability to read. YOU can't tell real history from fiction OR read a post apparently. Some of us CAN read and CAN tell real history from fiction etc. I hope you learn how, some day. Meanwhile it would behoove you to stop accusing people of hypocrisy based on your own stupidity. This message has been edited by Admin, 05-04-2005 12:13 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: I do not accept your fabrications as fact. The real fact is that you have no evidence to indicate that Exodus even existed 3500 years ago, nor do you have any testimony which can be reliably identified as coming from anyone who was there at the time. Let me also add that it would not be "INTELLIGENT" to set aside the evidence in favour of unquestioningly accepting your assertions. And that is true regardless of how little evidence we have.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
i'm not sure what you seem to think it is. but it is greivous error to think that what we have on our bed-side tables is an accurate compliation of stories by the people who were there. Well, but that's how I read it, and that's how it is taken by all the people I trust and admire, and that's how it has been taken throughout history. You've simply made it impossible to recognize the truth with all that studying you do about it. What is it that makes it possible to distinguish the history of Moses from Goldilocks? Basic intelligence would go a long way. Common sense. The ability to read. Or maybe it's just one of those things where the ordinary human mind is SO fallen it can't cope with such obvious stuff, in which case we must rely on God's help. If you can't recognize the stuff of reality when you read it, God help you indeed. Again, C.S. Lewis did a great job of discussing how the Bible is so far from anything like myth it takes a special kind of blindness to have such an idea. This message has been edited by Faith, 05-04-2005 11:48 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I do not accept your fabrications as fact. Nor I yours. We're even then.
The real fact is that you have no evidence to indicate that Exodus even existed 3500 years ago, nor do you have any testimony which can be reliably identified as coming from anyone who was there at the time. Sure I do. Moses himself, Joshua too. Again, testified to by the ages.
Let me also add that it would not be "INTELLIGENT" to set aside the evidence in favour of unquestioningly accepting your assertions. And that is true regardless of how little evidence we have. 3500 years of serious Biblical study by great men is not "my assertions." Putting your tentative stuff at 3500 years remove up against that is outrageous nonsense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
No, we're not even. I have presented evidence - you simply demand that I accept your unfounded opinions.
quote: Since you don't HAVE "3500 years of serious Biblical study by great men" I can hardly be going against it, can I ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22499 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Faith writes: The real fact is that you have no evidence to indicate that Exodus even existed 3500 years ago, nor do you have any testimony which can be reliably identified as coming from anyone who was there at the time. Sure I do. Moses himself, Joshua too. Again, testified to by the ages. We've gone over this, Faith. You're repeating your original argument and ignoring the objections. Moses saw Joshua who saw Aaron who saw Jethro who saw Hur who saw Moses who saw Zipporah and they all saw each other. And in Gone with the Wind Scarlett saw Rhett who saw Melanie who saw Ashley and they all saw each other. What is there about the story of Moses that ties it to the real world? That many people accept and have accepted the story of Moses as true is not evidence. Many people have believed many things over the course of history, and this includes the beliefs of religions other than Christianity. Your standards bear no resemblance to those of real history. The criteria you have described, that many people of faith whom you trust have accepted the story as true, is a religious argument, not a historical one. No scholar of history would ever advance such arguments in support of a historical interpretation. Your problem is that you think your religious beliefs have objective support, and what you have demonstrated over and over again by your own arguments is that they do not. Despite all your bluster about intellectualism, you accept the Biblical stories because of your faith in the truth of the Bible and also of your faith in the many people who have accepted the truth of the Bible over the centuries. And there's nothing wrong with this belief. But don't come into this site, which is dedicated to examining all claims as analytically and objectively as possible, demanding that we accept your arguments based upon your faith. Your arguments must stand or fall upon their merits, not upon your faith. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5222 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Faith,
Meanwhile it would behoove you to stop accusing people of hypocrisy based on your own stupidity. My apologies, I misread your post.
Some of us CAN read and CAN tell real history from fiction So I will ask you for the second time:
mark writes: So how do I tell "real history" with a genuine eyewitness, from a myth purporting itself to be fact with a fictional eyewitness? What innappropriate tools of the job am I using, exactly, to judge the authenticity of the Moses account of the Red Sea parting? It is, after all what this thread is about. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22499 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Many people have found discussions with Faith difficult. I think if we all better understand Faith's position that it will make discussions go much more smoothly. In this message I summarize Faith's position so that we may better understand where she is coming from.
I'm going to use a visual aid in this discussion that I'll refer to as Figure 1:
With apologies to See Figure 1... --Percy This message has been edited by Percy, 05-04-2005 01:29 PM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024