Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Comparisons of Neandertal mtDNA with modern humans and modern chimpanzees
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 76 of 80 (238213)
08-29-2005 7:42 AM


question asked for Death_stranger
in http://EvC Forum: Within Neandertal mt-DNA studies hybridization of fossil samples use as a probe -->EvC Forum: Within Neandertal mt-DNA studies hybridization of fossil samples use as a probe
Death_stranger asks:
Within the reference to a hybridizatized Neandertal sequences entirely due to highly "technical reasons" is now deemed a controversial analyse means From a journal paper, it read: Thereby " it seems highly unlikely that molecular hybridization of fossil samples fixed on a membrane and probed with fossil extracts could be used as a method to discriminate such related genomes as those of human and chimpanzee, even more to discriminate human from Neanderthal DNAs that are expected to be even closer" Why would anyone conclude this ?
Just passing it along.

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Death_stranger, posted 08-29-2005 9:48 PM RAZD has replied

  
Death_stranger 
Inactive Member


Message 77 of 80 (238427)
08-29-2005 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by RAZD
08-29-2005 7:42 AM


Re: question asked for Death_stranger
RAZD told me that "you can (usually) search the site for topic of interest (Neander mtDNA) and find a thread to ask your question if it is not already coveed ..unfortunately this is temporarily down"
What helped RAZD with asking this .. the UNWRITTEN or "draft" portions sent for the administration only in an e-mail (this was in RAZD's email box) to the mod/admin. "A technical question should be by it's very nature something that doesn't always make a nice message, my point has to do with why something is doomed to be lost in the clutter or going through this process again I'm only asking a question. I so thankful for your suggest and Thanks for your url but it doesn't include the research from the latter half of late-2004 the url wouldn't be the site for topic of interest (Neandertal mtDNA) You said something about " ..find a thread to ask your question if it is not about mitochondrial DNA extracted from Neanderthal" Okay? Alright, the fact remains that in all the pages this is more about a unique mechanism of Gene sequencing but maybe you didn't caught that. I know Percy hasn't either. Once more it is a remote Lab-Rat's chatter about a reference to 'a hybridizatized Neandertal sequences' unduely picked-up by Gish about the methodology 'entirely "due to highly "technical reasons" is now deemed a controversial analyse means'" There's not some small hair to split you'll failed to caught from my comments, am I wrong ? Wouldn't you know it not mentioned in IGOR V. OVCHINNIKOV, ANDERS GTHERSTRM, GALINA P. ROMANOVA, VITALIY M. KHARITONOV, KERSTIN LIDN & WILLIAM GOODWIN Journal Paper Look, it is less self indulgence and more seeking a answer in that highly "specialized" field that the rank and file couldn't hope to answer (Frankly I feel almost robbed by this whole experience) I have not decided to separate my grievance with Forum in the role your administrators have taken with the negative experience of not just asking the question If you want to do anything about this at all. Get whatever you can from this question research methodologies and NOT mtDNA sequences from *GTHERSTRM [also to include Kring's earlier study] and post it yourself or pass it on to someone that cares. This isn't the place to get into how Gish not surprisingly is seen as a propagandist for pseudoscience, many times Icr not only demonstrates a complete unsuitability or characteristics their role but are victims of pseudoscience propagandist, I was the last person to want to ask about something they were so interested in, but do they have a point about the unique mechanism of mt-DNA sequencing ??? This is the last time you will be hearing about this question That's to clue you in, the fact is the last time you will be hearing from me most definitely! Oh, Do NOT expect I'm going to pay for a writing seminar just to ask a question Good Day! (HUFF, HUFF, HUFF)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by RAZD, posted 08-29-2005 7:42 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by RAZD, posted 09-13-2005 6:09 PM Death_stranger has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 78 of 80 (243074)
09-13-2005 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Death_stranger
08-29-2005 9:48 PM


Admin request from Death_stranger
Admin -- I have received two e-mails from this poster asking that:
As I've said over and over we aren't able
to edit the message so why try I'd rather just delete it
if it's all the same to you (m=77)
As I do not have admin privilages I cannot do this for this post (I can only delete from my posts). If you want I can forward the whole e-mail for verification.
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Death_stranger, posted 08-29-2005 9:48 PM Death_stranger has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by AdminJar, posted 09-13-2005 6:54 PM RAZD has replied

  
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 80 (243083)
09-13-2005 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by RAZD
09-13-2005 6:09 PM


Re: Admin request from Death_stranger
We don't delete posts and the user knows that. Simply ignore any future mail. I apologize that he's bothering you.

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
Message 1
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by RAZD, posted 09-13-2005 6:09 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by RAZD, posted 09-13-2005 8:41 PM AdminJar has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 80 of 80 (243122)
09-13-2005 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by AdminJar
09-13-2005 6:54 PM


Re: Admin request from Death_stranger
That's kind of what I figured. It's not like it bothers anybody being there. Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by AdminJar, posted 09-13-2005 6:54 PM AdminJar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024