Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,763 Year: 4,020/9,624 Month: 891/974 Week: 218/286 Day: 25/109 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Legal unions: the "should", "are", and "when" of entering them
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1424 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 16 of 19 (270337)
12-17-2005 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Silent H
12-17-2005 6:57 AM


Hi holmes,
That's helpful.
There's one point that you kind of addressed, but I'd be interested for you to address more:
Do those benefits outweigh the problems that might arise in trying to get out of that legal arrangement later?
See, now maybe this is my "idealistic" side, but to me the big difference between a commitment and "civil union" or "marriage" is that you don't think about this kind of thing. A choice to enter one of these is supposed to mean "for life." Commitment to me means, "we stick together until we really both feel it would be better for us to be apart than together."
And don't get me wrong--I know there's times that you feel you'd be better off apart than together. I'm all about having buffer periods, extended periods over which you have to think so (on the order of months).
So... to me, the big difference between a committed relationship and some kind of civil union is that the marriage says, "we're so confident about this thing, we commit to being together for the rest of our lives... now." wheras in a committed relationship, there's always the choice to end it if it turns out you didn't forsee something, and it turns out the two of you would be better off going separate ways.
But I guess as a scientific thinker, I am well aware of the limits of my own knowledge and am always trying to make only "tentative conclusions." So it seems strange to me to... in my eyes, overstate knowledge. But maybe that's just because I've become less emotional with age and experience.
Anyway, thanks for the thoughts.
Ben

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Silent H, posted 12-17-2005 6:57 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Silent H, posted 12-17-2005 2:31 PM Ben! has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5845 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 17 of 19 (270351)
12-17-2005 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Ben!
12-17-2005 1:14 PM


but to me the big difference between a commitment and "civil union" or "marriage" is that you don't think about this kind of thing. A choice to enter one of these is supposed to mean "for life."
I would hope that even in a commited relationship the people involved feel as if it will last forever. That's sort of the sign that one is in a good relationship (and this is apart from whether it is multi partner, or open in a sexual sense to others). When one is feeling good and comfortable the idea that it might end is generally odious.
However, history and experience tend to show that that is the nature of the experience... it is a feeling of eternal sustainability, which may not have anything to do with cold hard reality.
Thus it is always important (to my mind) to move beyond the feeling and rationally assess what any legal procedure will mean at the end of a relationship.
For exampe, even for those not averse to marriage, the harder time (and more costly procedure) with divorce in Netherlands, might make a couple opt for a civil union instead.
Maybe a way to think about it is that when one gets on a boat one does so with the full intention of it not sinking (especially if it is one's boat that a lot of time, money, and love has gone into), but one still makes sure to have life vests and other emergency equipment.
If thinking about that makes one not want to go out on the boat, maybe a boat outing is not a good idea.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Ben!, posted 12-17-2005 1:14 PM Ben! has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 18 of 19 (270453)
12-18-2005 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Ben!
12-16-2005 7:45 PM


Ben writes:
How would you figure out whether to enter a union with somebody, Lam?
When it clicks...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Ben!, posted 12-16-2005 7:45 PM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Ben!, posted 12-18-2005 10:14 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1424 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 19 of 19 (270476)
12-18-2005 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by coffee_addict
12-18-2005 6:05 AM


Fair enough.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by coffee_addict, posted 12-18-2005 6:05 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024