PaulK writes:
You mean "disproving Buzsaw/Bible Hypothesis. Again"
This is the fossil of an early snake - it's not a dinosaur or even a close relative. We've covered the fact that snakes are closely related to lizards and not dinosaurs in the previous disucssions.
No. I mean
moving closer to.
1. Snakes originated on land, not in the sea -- no small factor.
2. Early snakes had legs as per Buzsaw/Bible hypothesis and contrary to conventional science erroneous theory.
PaulK writes:
A nf the age of this fossil shows - again - that snakes evolved long before the extinction of the dinosaurs.
Could it be that the folks who made such a huge blunder on the origin of snakes also got their extinction dates wrong on dinos?
PaulK writes:
No, that's completely false. The fossils further supports that scientific view in that it shows that snakes evolved rather than being transformed by a Divine curse.
1. The fossil lends more support to the Buzsaw/Bible hypothetic view that snakes originally had legs and originated on land then it does that snakes evolved. This incredible discovery establishes credence to two Biblical claims heretofore considered by conventional science as absolute unscientific absurdity, i.e that early snakes had legs and originated on land.
2. The fossil diminishes the view that snakes evolved in that natural selection should add legs rather than subtract them for the survival and mobility of the species.
PaulK writes:
It also confirms the view that there is no connection between the evolution of snakes and the extinction of the dinosaurs. As such it is yet nore evidence that the "Buzsaw/Bible" view is false. But then we already knew that.m”
The only thing it really confirms is that snakes didn't evolve from sea creatures and they had legs. The Buzsaw/Bible hypothesis also says that legless snakes preceeded the extinction of dinos, but of course, within a much later timespan. The Buzsaw/Bible hypothesis alleges that due to the far different atmospheric conditions and chemical makeup due to it, et al dating methods could have an erroneous reading.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW