I have often heard complaints from evolutionists concerning the validity of creation science as to the continous change in their models. They assert that since creationist are constantly changing their views (though holding true to the basic biblical account) that their theories are not valid because if they were, they wouldn't change it light of new evidence.
First of all, I would like to point out, that if something is real science, IT SHOULD CHANGE in light of new evidence. The theory of evolution is constantly undergoing change in light of new evidence. Why can't creation? If you are going to consider creation invalid due to continous change in their models then you should also consider evolution invalid due to its continous change in scientific models.
™ Version 4.2