Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,519 Year: 3,776/9,624 Month: 647/974 Week: 260/276 Day: 32/68 Hour: 1/12


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Death rates for the military in Iraq vs the folk back home
iano
Member (Idle past 1963 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 1 of 8 (356195)
10-12-2006 9:23 PM


Washinton Post recently writes:
There have been 2,757 U.S. military deaths since the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion.
Three and a half years in Iraq and the above is the US military death toll in that country. I happened across a YouTube video of grunt action in Iraq and at the end of it they honoured the fallen. (the 101st Airborne division). I paused the video and Googled one of the fallens names and came across this site:
Fallen Heroes of Operation Iraqi Freedom - Listed by name
Scrolling down the alphabetical list of the fallen and reading a brief description as to the circumstances of their deaths, I noticed that a lot of folk were killed whilst engaged in non-combat activities. A surprising amount. And there were many about which you couldn't say one way or the other. Does "Helicopter Crash" means that the helicopter was shot down or did it simply crash?
Then the thought occurred to me. "How many people of their ages could you expect to die in normal, non-war situations. It turns out that there is a thing called "Age Standardized Mortality Rate" which gives the amount of folk (per thousand) you can expect to die in a given year within a particular age group. This would be an across the board figure - not having anything in particular to do with folk being engaged in a war sone. Just how many of that age group die per thousand per year.
The ages of the folk listed on the fallenhero website seemed to me to fall within the 18-25 bracket but, Google novice that I am, I couldn't find a ASMR figure for that age group pertaining to the US. What I did find was this.
Death rate per country writes:
United States 8.25 per 1000 (2005 est.)
Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions
So I worked with this data. Across all ages groups, the US can expect to have 8.25 people per thousand of population/year die. This, incidently, puts the US 103rd on the world list of mortality (with Switzerland, Holland and Spain having more deaths per 1000/year and Ireland, Canada and well...Uzbekistan having less deaths per 1000/year)
I don't know what the specifics per age group is - I Googled my heart out but couldn't trip across a breakdown. But lets say we take 8.25/1000/yr as average for the US. This means that in a normal US population of 140,000 (which happens to be the current approximate US military force in Iraq) we can expect to have 1155 people die each year.
Doing the maths: in three and a half years (the duration of the current occupation and assuming a population of 140,000) we can expect 4042 people to die in civvie street US. Compare this to the 2757 who have died in a similar sized (military) population in Iraq in the same amount of time since the invasion began.
We see that the normal (civilian) death rate is nearly 150% that which has occurred in a similar population located in a war zone!
I find this remarkable (assuming the 8.25/1000/year to apply to 18-25 year olds). It would seem that you are more likely to die back in the US than you are to die on active service the Iraq.
This has ramifications. The death toll amongst service men and women seems to me to be oft quoted as a reason for the US to get out of Iraq. But if you are safer there than at home...?
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by NosyNed, posted 10-12-2006 9:35 PM iano has replied
 Message 4 by nwr, posted 10-12-2006 10:42 PM iano has not replied
 Message 5 by U can call me Cookie, posted 10-13-2006 5:59 AM iano has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 2 of 8 (356196)
10-12-2006 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by iano
10-12-2006 9:23 PM


Obviously Flawed
Your answer is meaningless unless you match the age brackets.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iano, posted 10-12-2006 9:23 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by iano, posted 10-12-2006 9:38 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1963 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 3 of 8 (356198)
10-12-2006 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by NosyNed
10-12-2006 9:35 PM


Re: Obviously Flawed
It wasn't an answer. It was a comment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by NosyNed, posted 10-12-2006 9:35 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 4 of 8 (356213)
10-12-2006 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by iano
10-12-2006 9:23 PM


The ages of the folk listed on the fallenhero website seemed to me to fall within the 18-25 bracket but, Google novice that I am, I couldn't find a ASMR figure for that age group pertaining to the US. What I did find was this.
Death rate per country writes:
United States 8.25 per 1000 (2005 est.)
Presumably that is the number who die over that 7 year period (age 18-25). You need to divide by 7 to find the number who die per year.
I found a table of death rates at cdc.gov. That gives a death rate of 0.104% for the year between age 20 and 21. Let's take that as 0.1% as close enough for a back-of-the-envelope calculation. So that is 0.1% per year.
The war has been going on for around 3 years. The number of troops has mostly been well under 200,000 over that period. That computes to an expected 600 deaths. So the 2700 means there were 2100 excess deaths among the troops.

Compassionate conservatism - bringing you a kinder, gentler torture chamber

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iano, posted 10-12-2006 9:23 PM iano has not replied

  
U can call me Cookie
Member (Idle past 4976 days)
Posts: 228
From: jo'burg, RSA
Joined: 11-15-2005


Message 5 of 8 (356248)
10-13-2006 5:59 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by iano
10-12-2006 9:23 PM


Number of Iraqi deaths due to the war...
Not really on topic, but i think it should be shown.
It is estimated that around 655,000 iraqis have died since the beginning of the war.
I wonder which death toll is considered more tragic by the US government...
Enormous death toll of Iraq invasion revealed
Edited by U can call me Cookie, : No reason given.

"The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iano, posted 10-12-2006 9:23 PM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Silent H, posted 10-13-2006 6:20 AM U can call me Cookie has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 6 of 8 (356250)
10-13-2006 6:20 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by U can call me Cookie
10-13-2006 5:59 AM


Re: Number of Iraqi deaths due to the war...
It is estimated that around 655,000 iraqis have died since the beginning of the war.
While I was against the invasion of Iraq and would even support criminal charges being brought against Bush and Co for it, I have to say I am skeptical about that estimate.
It's a sad statement that the US tends to look at Iraq through the lens of just its own dead, rather than what it has inflicted. More credible numbers are extremely high. I'm not sure why people felt like it needed to be padded. And unfortunately it does a disservice by allowing the Bush administration to cast doubt on actual figures.

holmes {in temp decloak from lurker mode}
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by U can call me Cookie, posted 10-13-2006 5:59 AM U can call me Cookie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by U can call me Cookie, posted 10-13-2006 7:04 AM Silent H has replied

  
U can call me Cookie
Member (Idle past 4976 days)
Posts: 228
From: jo'burg, RSA
Joined: 11-15-2005


Message 7 of 8 (356254)
10-13-2006 7:04 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Silent H
10-13-2006 6:20 AM


Re: Number of Iraqi deaths due to the war...
while the figure was derived at via extrapolation, i'm not sure one could accuse the researchers of "padding".
Fact is, though, i'd prefer it to be an overestimate...

"The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Silent H, posted 10-13-2006 6:20 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Silent H, posted 10-13-2006 7:21 AM U can call me Cookie has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 8 of 8 (356256)
10-13-2006 7:21 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by U can call me Cookie
10-13-2006 7:04 AM


Re: Number of Iraqi deaths due to the war...
i'm not sure one could accuse the researchers of "padding".
Point taken.

holmes {in temp decloak from lurker mode}
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by U can call me Cookie, posted 10-13-2006 7:04 AM U can call me Cookie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024