Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Omniscience, Omnipotence, the Fall & Logical Contradictions.
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4775 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 211 of 354 (362540)
11-08-2006 2:10 AM
Reply to: Message 204 by jar
11-06-2006 8:37 PM


jar writes:
Found out that IBibleNano is under 16.
They're all children. The only difference is in how well they hide it.
Edited by DominionSeraph, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by jar, posted 11-06-2006 8:37 PM jar has not replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4775 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 212 of 354 (362543)
11-08-2006 2:17 AM
Reply to: Message 210 by RAZD
11-07-2006 10:43 PM


RAZD writes:
Earth can be defined as a cage for all life on earth: does that make us caged?
An unlimited "free" is self-contradictory.
Check yourself.
Edited by DominionSeraph, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by RAZD, posted 11-07-2006 10:43 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2006 7:42 AM DominionSeraph has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 213 of 354 (362587)
11-08-2006 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 212 by DominionSeraph
11-08-2006 2:17 AM


An unlimited "free" is self-contradictory.
Check yourself.
I don't need unlimited. ONE "free" means unlimited "caged" is false.
We gots nottink to lose but our chainz.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-08-2006 2:17 AM DominionSeraph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-08-2006 1:54 PM RAZD has replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4775 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 214 of 354 (362648)
11-08-2006 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by RAZD
11-08-2006 7:42 AM


RAZD writes:
I don't need unlimited. ONE "free" means unlimited "caged" is false.
An unlimited caged is self-contradictory.
Edited by DominionSeraph, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2006 7:42 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2006 5:38 PM DominionSeraph has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 215 of 354 (362679)
11-08-2006 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 214 by DominionSeraph
11-08-2006 1:54 PM


oh?
quote:
cage” -noun
1. a boxlike enclosure having wires, bars, or the like, for confining and displaying birds or animals.
2. anything that confines or imprisons; prison.
quote:
un·lim·it·ed adj.
1. Having no restrictions or controls: an unlimited travel ticket.
2. Having or seeming to have no boundaries; infinite: an unlimited horizon.
3. Without qualification or exception; absolute: unlimited self-confidence.
Thus "anything that confines or imprisons" "without qualification or exception" would be unlimited caged.
What's the contradiction?
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : bbcode

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-08-2006 1:54 PM DominionSeraph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-09-2006 4:25 AM RAZD has replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4775 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 216 of 354 (362793)
11-09-2006 4:25 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by RAZD
11-08-2006 5:38 PM


RAZD writes:
Thus "anything that confines or imprisons" "without qualification or exception" would be unlimited caged.
What's the contradiction?
It would have to cage itself (as not to would be an exception), while not caging itself (as it's unlimited -- uncaged).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2006 5:38 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2006 9:15 PM DominionSeraph has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 217 of 354 (362980)
11-09-2006 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by DominionSeraph
11-09-2006 4:25 AM


The universe is such a cage.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-09-2006 4:25 AM DominionSeraph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by nwr, posted 11-09-2006 9:30 PM RAZD has replied
 Message 219 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-10-2006 4:28 AM RAZD has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 218 of 354 (362981)
11-09-2006 9:30 PM
Reply to: Message 217 by RAZD
11-09-2006 9:15 PM


The universe is such a cage.
If the universe is expanding, maybe it isn't really a cage

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2006 9:15 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2006 12:17 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4775 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 219 of 354 (363022)
11-10-2006 4:28 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by RAZD
11-09-2006 9:15 PM


Thus it is not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2006 9:15 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2006 12:20 PM DominionSeraph has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 220 of 354 (363058)
11-10-2006 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by nwr
11-09-2006 9:30 PM


If the universe is expanding,
Thus it is unrestricted.
maybe it isn't really a cage
It still contains everything it had in it each instant before without exception. It still contains itself.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by nwr, posted 11-09-2006 9:30 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 221 of 354 (363060)
11-10-2006 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by DominionSeraph
11-10-2006 4:28 AM


you were the one brought up unrestricted, when the discussion was relative restriction and freedom.
I take it you agree that there are spectrums of freedom and spectrums of restrictions.
whether you accept the argument about the universe or not.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-10-2006 4:28 AM DominionSeraph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-15-2006 7:46 AM RAZD has replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4775 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 222 of 354 (363867)
11-15-2006 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 221 by RAZD
11-10-2006 12:20 PM


RAZD writes:
you were the one brought up unrestricted, when the discussion was relative restriction and freedom.
They're always limited and, due to practical considerations, nearly always relative. (By binding to a subject, any direction that doesn't apply to that subject doesn't need to be addressed. If you don't bind it to a subject, you have to completely enclose it; and determining whether you're at the end of the concievable directions, and whether there are any inconceivable directions, tends to be problematic.)
You're the one who brought up unrestricted in your attempt to sound Zen, as that's what you used to disassociate Cage(1) from Cage(2) so that you could have a Cage(A) and Cage(NOT Cage A).
I have an addition for your signature:
"Enlightenment is in confusing your terms."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2006 12:20 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by RAZD, posted 11-15-2006 6:16 PM DominionSeraph has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 223 of 354 (363961)
11-15-2006 6:16 PM
Reply to: Message 222 by DominionSeraph
11-15-2006 7:46 AM


You're the one who brought up unrestricted in your attempt to sound Zen,...
Actually it was you:
Message 212
An unlimited "free" is self-contradictory.
... as that's what you used to disassociate Cage(1) from Cage(2)... I have an addition for your signature: "Enlightenment is in confusing your terms."
You are, of course, completely free to believe that.
Enjoy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-15-2006 7:46 AM DominionSeraph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by Nighttrain, posted 11-16-2006 7:58 PM RAZD has not replied
 Message 228 by DominionSeraph, posted 11-20-2006 8:26 PM RAZD has replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4014 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 224 of 354 (364182)
11-16-2006 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 223 by RAZD
11-15-2006 6:16 PM


Free Willy
Y'mean I can enjoy free will, or not enjoy free will-----at will?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by RAZD, posted 11-15-2006 6:16 PM RAZD has not replied

  
dogrelata
Member (Idle past 5332 days)
Posts: 201
From: Scotland
Joined: 08-04-2006


Message 225 of 354 (364537)
11-18-2006 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by iano
10-05-2006 10:48 AM


Special insight?
iano writes:
Nobody is reasoned into Christianity. It can only make sense from the perspective of having insights currently closed to you. The catch-22 of faith. "Faith is the evidence of things not seen" - but you don't get that faith (evidence) until you have faith (belief)
A little further on in another post we read:
iano writes:
Faith adds another dimension to single dimension reason. Reason it remains but it is expanded upon. Whereas standard reason views a plan view of a house and can take you so far, faith adds glimpses into the 3D solid model. Unless you see it yourself of course it will seem unreasonable. It is unreasonable from your perspective. You know that the bible talks constantly of this blindness (to this other dimension).
I think the idea of who has the greater insight, the believer or non-believer, is an interesting one. So I’d like to start with my own humble, faithless view of knowledge and understanding.
In very broad terms, it appears to me that knowledge falls into two categories - imparted knowledge and knowledge by experience. Imparted knowledge is gathered by reading, for example, or talking with friends or watching our favourite news channel, or any source we consider trustworthy.
Knowledge by experience is perhaps a more personal knowledge. For example, I guess most of us have stubbed our toe at some time or another, and those of us that have will have knowledge of what it is to have done so. Those who have been lucky enough never to do so do not have the knowledge of what it is to do so, but can gain a degree of knowledge and understanding of the experience by reading about it or talking to a friend - if they are so inclined
To these two categories, iano proposes the addition of a third - knowledge by faith or through faith. This third category is open only to those who choose to embrace faith, so it seems, which is why the insights it offers are beyond the likes of me I’m afraid
Which is probably why I come up with clumsy analogies like this one:
I assemble a number of people together in a darkened room with a beam of light being projected against one of the walls. I then place my hands in front of the light source and manipulate them in such a manner as to produce an image in shadow that looks just like a rabbit. I then ask everybody what he or she sees. They all reply that they see a rabbit. So I further ask if what they see is actually a rabbit or a shadow that just happens to look like a rabbit. Again they all reply that they see a shadow that looks like a rabbit - apart from one individual who says he actually sees a rabbit. When pressed to tell why he sees an actual rabbit as opposed to just a shadow on the wall, he replies that he has faith that this is actually a rabbit, and hence possesses the additional insight required to see what we cannot, using our ”single dimension reason’.
So who should I conclude has the greater insight, the individual who actually sees a rabbit, or those that don’t? iano says, ”You know that the bible talks constantly of this blindness (to this other dimension).’ So are we to give credence to every piece of knowledge or understanding that emanates from the ”greater insight’ offered by faith(s), or are those of us blundering around blindly with our ”single dimension reason’ entitled to employ just a smidgeon of scepticism when faced with any claim of this nature?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by iano, posted 10-05-2006 10:48 AM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by RAZD, posted 11-18-2006 6:26 PM dogrelata has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024