Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,410 Year: 3,667/9,624 Month: 538/974 Week: 151/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   UCLA student tased multiple times... pointless police violence?
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 69 of 142 (365112)
11-21-2006 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Chiroptera
11-19-2006 3:26 PM


Re: Reviewing the video
chiroptera writes:
Because the problem wasn't just to eject the person from the premises. The person was questioning and resisting the official representatives of the authority of the state. Any resistance to the state at all can become a terrible example to others that will serve to undermine obedience public order
I agree completely. It seems pretty clear that the only offense that the student committed was not bowing and tugging his forelock at the cops' request. That kind of behaviour is what the cops (and people like nemesis juggernaut) think is "escalation".
Well, of course it IS escalation. From the police point of view, any challenge to their complete authority is the most dangerous challenge that can be made. Passive resistance to the cops is far more dangerous to them than any screaming drunk or loony with a knife. Of course, that is the reason the cops got mad. They undoubtedly treated him worse than they would have treated somebody caught drunk driving but who responded with the expected obsequity.
Fuckin pigs.
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Chiroptera, posted 11-19-2006 3:26 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 83 of 142 (366559)
11-28-2006 4:44 PM


"fuck the police"
You know, I've watched the video clip a few times and one of the main things that upsets me is that the surrounding students, while clearly disapproving of the cops' behaviour, do absolutely nothing to help the victim. Absolutely nothing at all!
If I was in the position of the onlookers, I find it hard to imagine I would do nothing at all. I think it would be appropriate to perform a citizen's arrest on the cops, and to give some first aid to the student. When I put myself in the place of the onlookers, I would like to think I would try to help the tasered guy by giving one or more of the cops a good uppercut to the head. The fact that the students surrounding this incident are unable to do a single thing to help him other than yelling "stop that" is quite depressing.
This all indicates to me a rather scary attititude - "we should all respect cops" - has permeated the society even to those who should be most against it.
Very sad. This guy was physically attacked for no reason, and his fellow student stood around in a circle and did absolutely nothing to help him.
Mick

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 11-28-2006 6:20 PM mick has not replied
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2006 6:26 PM mick has replied
 Message 134 by nator, posted 12-01-2006 5:04 PM mick has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 87 of 142 (366604)
11-28-2006 7:36 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by crashfrog
11-28-2006 6:26 PM


Re: "fuck the police"
crashfrog,
I think you are being a bit silly here.
crashfrog writes:
What should they have done? Assault a bunch of cops? Get shot?
I was expecting to be criticised for my attitude that cops are working against the interests of normal students. I DID NOT expect to get criticised for thinking that the US democracy has degraded to such an extent that standing up to cops was tantamount to suicide. If you genuinely think that the twenty to thirty students surrounding this incident would have been shot and killed by the cops, then american democracy is in a FAR WORSE a state than I have interpreted it. Sure, if the students are in danger of being murdered for standing up for a brown-skinned person, then you are quite right, they should be saving up their efforts for more coordinated activity. But I doubt very strongly that the cops in this case were going to shoot thirty white students to death. I am not aware of any incident where college cops have shot to death thirty white students. But maybe you are right, and US citizens are genuinely living in some crazy Orwellian fantasy of instant obliteration if they stand up to the police????
crashfrog writes:
You don't think that would have resulted in the escalation of force? All the way up to "deadly"? You're asking quite a bit to demand that a crowd of people die for a complete stranger.
Again, you have the weird idea that the cops are going to kill any student who stands against them. If you are serious, I hope you are talking to your congressman about this problem. Because it would be a very serious problem, if it were true.
crashfrog writes:
A bunch of them taped it; I'd say that was the best thing they could have done.
Well, in your fantasy world in which anybody standing up against the tyrannical UCLA security guards is going to die a violent death, that is probably the best that they can do. Personally, I think that the cops are servants of the people, and that a couple of well-placed uppercuts would be sufficient in calming the situation and showing the cops exactly who they are supposed to be working for.
I'm really baffled by your post. Your comments on biological matters seem quite sensible, but when you talk about student politics you make it sound like major massacres of students are right round the corner!
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2006 6:26 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Taz, posted 11-28-2006 7:41 PM mick has not replied
 Message 89 by Chiroptera, posted 11-28-2006 7:42 PM mick has not replied
 Message 91 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2006 8:20 PM mick has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 92 of 142 (366627)
11-28-2006 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by crashfrog
11-28-2006 8:01 PM


Re: "fuck the police"
gasby writes:
If the surrounding students were to step up and bash the cops on the head, it would have turned into an excuse for the cops to carry out more excessive force without being criticized.
chiroptera writes:
if the students had done something more physical, and if violence did escalate, then public opinion would overwhelmingly have been on the side of the police
This is why Americans are considered political illiterates everywhere in the world. These lazy, bourgeois people think that the aim of democracy is to avoid "being bashed on the head". Their concern with playing things by the book is what allowed their rulers to invade another country and to kill tens of thousands if people in the name of an emasculated vision of democracy which involves "being nice to cops". It's depressing to read it, and more so because the people who write this nonsense are on the left rather than the right of politics.
It is time for the left in the US to stand against the authoritarian violence that is carried out in their name. It is unsurprising that Americans fail to do so. Rather, they would rather deal in ironies:
chiroptera writes:
Americans don't even like violent protest.
gasby writes:
they are authorized to use lethal force if they felt threatened, and a bunch of students jumping on top of these cops would have been perceived as very threatening
Pathetic.
Mick
Edited by mick, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2006 8:01 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Chiroptera, posted 11-28-2006 9:06 PM mick has replied
 Message 98 by Taz, posted 11-28-2006 9:31 PM mick has not replied
 Message 128 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-29-2006 1:49 PM mick has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 95 of 142 (366654)
11-28-2006 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Chiroptera
11-28-2006 9:06 PM


Re: "fuck the police"
crashfrog writes:
What "left" in the US? Do you mean the entire left here in the US? Well, okay, but I'm not sure even the both of us together will accomplish much.
Well that is your problem isn't it? I have been active in trade unions and anti-racism campaigns in my own country, and it maybe is time for middle class white students at UCLA to be active too.
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Chiroptera, posted 11-28-2006 9:06 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 97 of 142 (366658)
11-28-2006 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Michael
11-28-2006 9:13 PM


well michael, this is exactly what I mean. Lazy americans who think they are excluded from democratic participation because they live in backwaters like Oklahoma. It's pathetic, and dangerous.
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Michael, posted 11-28-2006 9:13 PM Michael has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Michael, posted 11-28-2006 9:43 PM mick has replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 101 of 142 (366667)
11-28-2006 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Michael
11-28-2006 9:43 PM


Okay, I said:
"This is why Americans are considered political illiterates everywhere in the world"
In response I get the following replies:
Chiroptera writes:
Hee hee hee
Michael writes:
... especially not from Oklahoma.
Gasby writes:
Can't you see I'm a tasmanian devil?
Chiroptera writes:
What "left" in the US?
Well, I'm proved incorrect aren't I? Politically-committed citizens of the US have clearly demonstrated their clarity of thought and knowledge of history.
Excuse me whie I vomit.
Mick
Edited by mick, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Michael, posted 11-28-2006 9:43 PM Michael has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by Michael, posted 11-28-2006 9:59 PM mick has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 104 of 142 (366672)
11-28-2006 10:09 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by Chiroptera
11-28-2006 10:04 PM


Well Chiroptera, it's more serious than that.
Your rulers have gone and invaded a foreign country for their own financial gain, and now they're tyrannizing dark-skinned citizens within US borders.
I don't see any response from US citizens that makes me think anybody is taking this seriously. The question is, can you go and drift into a fascist government and enjoy it while feeling smug for scoring a point on Evc forum?
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Chiroptera, posted 11-28-2006 10:04 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by mick, posted 11-28-2006 10:17 PM mick has not replied
 Message 129 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-29-2006 1:55 PM mick has not replied
 Message 135 by nator, posted 12-01-2006 5:11 PM mick has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 106 of 142 (366674)
11-28-2006 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by mick
11-28-2006 10:09 PM


I mean, what really pisses me off is that people like Chiroptera, who is on the far left of politics on EvC forum, seems happy to err on the side of the cops. They're fucking cowards for doing it - one has to wonder how far fascism in the US has to go before they'll criticize it. It just pisses me off, to see bright people make excuses for a bunch of right wing white fuckers in uniforms and with badges, kicking the shit out of an Iranian for no reason. They should be ashamed of themselves. And if that happened in MY library, I would certainly punch the cop in the head and rescue the Iranian.
I should say, I have not spoken to a single person in Canada who thinks I'm off-the-wall, including professional librarians, who say they would not permit such violence on their premises and would welcome student support to get the cops off the premises.
Mick
Edited by mick, : No reason given.
Edited by mick, : in edit: mind you, libraries in Canada are open to the public, unlike elitist libraries in the US where you have to show ID just to get through the door.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by mick, posted 11-28-2006 10:09 PM mick has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by DrJones*, posted 11-28-2006 10:28 PM mick has replied
 Message 111 by anglagard, posted 11-28-2006 10:47 PM mick has not replied
 Message 113 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 11-28-2006 10:50 PM mick has replied
 Message 114 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2006 10:51 PM mick has replied
 Message 136 by nator, posted 12-01-2006 5:13 PM mick has replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 107 of 142 (366675)
11-28-2006 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Michael
11-28-2006 10:10 PM


michael, do you want to criticize my thought, or just make snide comments from the sidelines?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Michael, posted 11-28-2006 10:10 PM Michael has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 109 of 142 (366678)
11-28-2006 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by DrJones*
11-28-2006 10:28 PM


drJones writes:
It was a university library. I was asked to produce my student ID in the library at least 5 times during my time at the U of A.
Dr Jones, you should have found out what your rights were before being hassled like that. The vast majority of Canadian univeristies allow ANYBODY to use their libraries. And I know from personal experience that UA is one of those libraries.
in edit: as far as I know, public access to university libraries is guaranteed by law, in canada.
dr jones writes:
. No matter the who was right or wrong, a mob charging the cops is just gonna get more people tasered or worse.
Are you seriously suggesting that the cops would taser 20-40 people? That's just bullshit, and you know it is. That would never happen in a public library in the US.
Mick
Edited by mick, : No reason given.
Edited by mick, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by DrJones*, posted 11-28-2006 10:28 PM DrJones* has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 112 of 142 (366683)
11-28-2006 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by Chiroptera
11-28-2006 10:40 PM


He's no longer reading the thread, it seems, but making up his own conversation as he goes along.
mick writes:
I mean, what really pisses me off is that people like Chiroptera...seems happy to err on the side of the cops.
chiroptera writes:
I guarantee, if the students had done something more physical, and if violence did escalate, then public opinion would overwhelmingly have been on the side of the police.
Chiroptera, that is the quote I would say is pro-cop. You say without any evidence whatsoever (indeed, you guarantee it!) that the cops have the favor of public opinion. You might disagree with my interpretation that you are pro-cop, but it would be better to make your position clear, rather than saying I am being stupid.
Mick
Edited by mick, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Chiroptera, posted 11-28-2006 10:40 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by Chiroptera, posted 11-28-2006 11:19 PM mick has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 116 of 142 (366689)
11-28-2006 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by crashfrog
11-28-2006 10:51 PM


crashfrog writes:
I'm not defending brutal cops. But asking random strangers to die for a stranger? Faulting them for not doing it? On what planet do you live where that's reasonable?
Crashfrog, you are arguing against somebody's argument, but it is not mine!
I have never suggested that anybody might die, and it is utterly innapropriate for you to suggest otherwise. I have made it quite clear that a concerted response from the onlookers might help the young man.
mick writes:
the surrounding students, while clearly disapproving of the cops' behaviour, do absolutely nothing to help the victim.
I don't see anything there saying anybody has to die. This is probably something in your American fantasy world.
crashfrog writes:
The only person who made excuses for those cops was NJ
I don't agree.
crashfrog writes:
They used their own brutality as an excuse for more brutality.
That is, quite clearly, an explanation of the tasering cops attitude. You say that they tasered him "as an excuse for more brutality."
It is an explanation I happen to disagree with. Deal with it.
crashfrog writes:
The rest of us are "making excuses" for the completely unrelated bystanders who did exactly the right thing - recorded an instance of police brutality and took it to the authorities, not charging armed, violent men at the cost of their own lives.
I happen to disagree with the idea that they did "exactly the right thing". I think I've made my reasoning quite clear.
You make completely irrelevant propoganda comments, like:
crashfrog writes:
Your high horse looks a little shaky in the legs. I'd get down from it before you wind up on your ass.
I'm not particularly worried about "winding up on my ass" but I don't want my point of view to be rubbished for no reason. I'm sorry, but I don't find that kind of argument convincing.
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2006 10:51 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by crashfrog, posted 11-29-2006 1:18 AM mick has replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 118 of 142 (366708)
11-29-2006 1:32 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by crashfrog
11-29-2006 1:18 AM


crashfrog writes:
And we've rebutted this nonsense. You're asking people to charge into "suicide by cop." Do they not have that where you live? Suicide by cop?
Is it so strange that I have never heard of such a thing? I have to say I am amazed that you think "suicide by cop" is a normal state of affairs that I (for some reason?) am supposed to take for granted.
No, I've never heard of "suicide by cop" and if that's seriously what is motivating these students' behaviour then it goes without saying that they can't be held responsible for what they do.
crashfrog writes:
hat you describe definitely puts the cops in danger, and they would definately use lethal force.
Well I am learning a lot about US campuses here. Apparently students are in danger of lethal force while reading quietly in the library! I am sorry if UCLA has such problems with terrorism, that "lethal force" is de rigeur on campus.
Sigh... If that is what your argument lies upon - lethal force as a standard form of discipline, and "suicide by cop" as a way of life - well then you can win the argument no probs.
But don't you see how stupid your argument sounds? You appear to be saying: "If somebody gets tazered for no reason in the middle of your public library, don't do anything, because the cops might use lethal force on YOU!"
Mick
Edited by mick, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by crashfrog, posted 11-29-2006 1:18 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by crashfrog, posted 11-29-2006 1:44 AM mick has replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 119 of 142 (366710)
11-29-2006 1:36 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by alacrity fitzhugh
11-28-2006 10:50 PM


Hmmn. That sounds encouraging. yet crashfrog is saying that suicide by cop and the use of lethal force is standard on US campuses... so now I don't know what to believe...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 11-28-2006 10:50 PM alacrity fitzhugh has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by crashfrog, posted 11-29-2006 1:46 AM mick has not replied
 Message 127 by Wounded King, posted 11-29-2006 11:48 AM mick has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024