Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Design on a Dime
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 48 of 113 (414729)
08-05-2007 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by ringo
08-05-2007 9:20 PM


Ringo writes:
I suggested that a God who builds a machine (designs a process) would be "greater" than a God who operates a machine. You brought up an artist who controls every aspect of the finished product. Who believes that about God?
Either God is transcendent. You are correct that few believe God micromanages the sex lives of ants or something, but one could still hold to a belief that all of nature is somehow connected and dependent on God in substance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by ringo, posted 08-05-2007 9:20 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 10:45 AM anastasia has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 50 of 113 (414791)
08-06-2007 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Straggler
08-06-2007 10:45 AM


Re: Artists and Playwrites
Straggler writes:
One who defines the story, sets the scene and creates the characters but who ultimately lets the actors interpret those characters to the best of their ability and lets the story unfold within certai predefined parameters?
Isn't that pretty much how we view the world normally? I wasn't suggesting that free will does not exist.
I asked two questions. One was about how much planning went into the universe, which is somewhat important to those who do not believe humans are here by accident. You and Ringo have both given me variations on that question.
The other question was whether or not God, in any way, = Universe, something which Buz for example overlaps in his theology, and which pantheism teaches. You really can't get a hold on it unless you stop seeng God as human, or superhuman, or just an invisible man.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 10:45 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 12:17 PM anastasia has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 52 of 113 (414799)
08-06-2007 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Straggler
08-06-2007 12:17 PM


Re: Artists and Playwrites
I believe the universe had a beginning, but I don't know that Buz does, and he probably doesn't make science the top priority.
Either way, you can get into weird stuff, like a belief that the physical universe had a beginning, but that the underlying 'substance' of the universe is purely spirit, and has always existed.
Wiki writes:
Pantheism (Greek: ( 'pan' ) = all and ‘ ( 'theos' ) = God) literally means "God is All" and "All is God". It is the view that everything is of an all-encompassing immanent abstract God; or that the universe, or nature, and God are equivalent. More detailed definitions tend to emphasize the idea that natural law, existence, and the universe (the sum total of all that is, was, and shall be) is represented or personified in the theological principle of an abstract 'god'.
You are not so much confused how I meant universe, but how I mean God. The definition for pantheism may help.
Oh, and stop pussy-footing around! I am not taking any of this personally, and they are not even specifically my beliefs. I do know I believe in free-will, so I would rule out scenerios which preclude it.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 12:17 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 1:35 PM anastasia has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 54 of 113 (414847)
08-06-2007 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Straggler
08-06-2007 1:35 PM


Re: Artists and Playwrites
Straggler writes:
Is the idea that God is an all pervading omni-consciousness without physical form? Again - What does that actually mean in practical terms? Is God really partaking in my decision as to whether to go to the gym this evening or sit at home and drink wine with Mrs Straggler? Does god experience my most intimate and embarressing moments? If so why? To what purpose?
I am not a pantheist, but it is a very prevalent belief in many cultures, and it has some merit. I don't know how conscious the God of pantheism is, but some may call it the Supreme Consciousness. It's a little different from an all-seeing God who actually cares what you and Mrs Straggler do. Remember, there are two Gods of Genesis, and the belief in a personal God is not IMO the only or main belief we should be dwelling on at this stage in human history.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 1:35 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Straggler, posted 08-06-2007 6:08 PM anastasia has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 57 of 113 (415150)
08-08-2007 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Stile
08-07-2007 5:28 PM


Re: Any persuasion?
Hi Stile,
My keyboard has been sailing in and out of port, so I couldn't respond right away.
You and Straggler are making me smile. I don't mind your input at all, but good food for thought, but I suppose not directly relevent to Christianity.
Instantaneous, I would guess at.
Yes, but there are several ways in which one could see that.
For a non-evo creationist, creation lasted some period of days. The actual 'creatures' were formed instantaneously in tradition, and the 'event' was more a collection of events which occured 'in the beginning', but in 'real' time.
I have never totally believed in the 'real' time part, but I could easily believe that all of creation occured instantaneously, and
only appears to stretch out into billions of years in our time.
Perhaps that something more is another level of the predictable natural world we have yet to understand. Perhaps that something more is another level of the unpredictable natural world we have yet to understand (like aliens or an alternate dimension of existance or something). Perhaps that something is some sort of supernatural being. Whatever it is, it's no longer "creation".
Miracles? Paranormal events? Anything specific in mind? I am surprised so far to find two pretty hard core atheists willing to believe in something more, but maybe you have more of a problem with traditional religions?
1. None of it, on the macroscopic level. That is, anything you can see with your eyes, even with the help of a 100x microscope.
Also, we can have "unknown outcomes" without "chance" as long as we have intelligence. Prey escaping a predator may go left around an obstacle or right. The outcome is unknown. But the path is specifically chosen by the prey's intelligence, and is not random.
2. At least some of it, on the microscopic level. That is, anything smaller than the level of atoms and molecules.
Hah, well obviously things do happen as a result of intelligence. Global warming? I think I should have asked whether a persn has a belief that all natural mechanisms were designed.
I am not convinced that they are, they must just exist, like math.
I'm not sure. I don't think so. And I don't think God's required. But there is that small area of unknown supernaturalism. Ghost stories, UFO's, unexplained phenomena. Can it all be simply people with mis-understood observations and over-active imaginations? I don't know. I suppose it could. I don't think so. I think that there is definitely something there. I don't know whether or not that "something" is natural or supernatural, though. I don't even have enough information to make a guess.
In that one way, I feel that my religion makes me intellectually dishonest. I don't believe in ghosts 'haunting', although I believe in apparitions, because I don't see why they need be here, in the context of my belief. Ghosts should be neatly packed in Purgatory. There are many unexplained things which I write off just because they don't coincide with what I believe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Stile, posted 08-07-2007 5:28 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Stile, posted 08-08-2007 3:04 PM anastasia has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 90 of 113 (37177)
04-16-2003 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Stile
08-08-2007 3:04 PM


Re: Smile away
Stile writes:
Just because I don't believe in the Christian God, doesn't mean I don't believe in any God. I have no problem with tradition, I only have a problem with specific religions.
That is, if a religion says "We believe in a God that created the world 6000 years ago", and it can be proven that the world has been around a lot longer than 6000 years... then I have a problem with that specific and do not belive such a God exists.
Given the number of different specific Gods different people "whole-heartedly" believe in... I'm forced to think that they're all wrong. That is, there very well may be "a God", but I doubt very much that anyone on this earth has ever had any actual insight as to understanding that God. In any way.
Most of us could say the same. In fact, we could say the same and be Christian. It is not required to believe in a 6000 year old earth, and we could certainly say that we can know only the tiniest reflection of God.
I somehow thought you were atheist, but I suppose you just refuse to put God in a neat package.
Just to point out... this "possibility for the existance of God" isn't really why I believe in the possibility of a God. It's just an option for explaining such unexplained situations. When I do think about believing in a God, it always comes down to "because I want a God to exist". I haven't yet heard of any more-convincing arguement. This world has proven to me that I don't always get what I want. But that does not remove my desire, nor the possibility. And one thing this world has proven to me... is the power of hope. And the power of hope remains regardless of that hope being factually realized.
I think along the same lines myself, I surmise that hope and intuition, gut instinct and deep longing, are indications of something 'real' which lies in the future of man. Surely no argument to bring to court.
I think I just wanted to show that although I may hotly defend the possibility of an existance without God, I do not state that this is adamantaly such an existance. I just don't see any requirement for a God. That has no bearing on any God's actual existance, nor my beliefs in the matter. I do consider myself atheist though. It's socially simpler to say "I'm an atheist" than to explain this long-winded post when they amount to the same thing in most people's eyes anyway
Oops, sorry for jumping the gun in the first part of my post. I don't agree with you though that 'atheism' is the simplest explanation. A great number of people are 'lapsed believers' who no longer belong to any formal religion, but still retain faith in God of some sort. You believe God is or may be responsible for some paranormal events, which tentatively puts you beyond deism. You are waiting for conformation so to speak, before you believe in God. You are waiting to see if a God is required. Yet, you say you believe, because you want to believe. So, I say find what is in your heart. You may end up with 0 reasons to believe in God, but that really means nothing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Stile, posted 08-08-2007 3:04 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024