Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,876 Year: 4,133/9,624 Month: 1,004/974 Week: 331/286 Day: 52/40 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fulfilled Prophecy
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1372 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 91 of 303 (374958)
01-06-2007 2:28 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 2:12 PM


false prophecy
A false prophet is someone claiming to give a prophecy from God, when it didn't come from God.
if a prophecy is given (quite clearly) and one misrepresents it so as to make it mean something else, how is this not a false prophecy?
The implication is that they are secretly aware that they are full of bs, but don't divulge that information because they covet power.
but it's ok if they don't know that they are full of bs? what if they are willfully ignorant that they are full of bs? and clearly, a lot christian leaders covet power.
Everybody who forms an opinion thinks they are right. No one goes out seeking to be wrong. What they do is to try and assert that they are actually right and that their opposition is actually wrong. Someone interpreting scriptures may believe that they are interpreting correctly. The other person thinks that they are the ones interpreting it correctly. One or both parties can conceivably be wrong, but only one of them can conceivably be right in accordance to the law of non-contradiction.
when one position is contradicted by simply reading the text itself, which position is right?
"Their bodies will lie in the street of the great city, which is figuratively called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified. For three and a half days men from every people, tribe, language and nation will gaze on their bodies and refuse them burial." -Revelation 11
So, the Bible does not mention television outright, only possible allusions of it.
i don't see it. it doesn't say everyone, just people from everywhere. if you or i used that colloquially, no one would think we meant "everyone on the planet" just a "large and diverse group of people." at best, representatives. couldn't this verse be predicting the UN?
UN... television... UN... television. hmm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 2:12 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 9:20 PM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 137 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-08-2007 12:12 AM arachnophilia has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 92 of 303 (374965)
01-06-2007 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 2:12 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
NJ writes:
So, the Bible does not mention television outright, only possible allusions of it. Its just one of those things that is only now conceivable because of the increase of technology. Why do you ask?
The reason I ask is that this prophecy business clearly shows that literal inerrantists are claiming they can use the Bible to mean television, when it does not clearly say television. Yet when someone says the six days of creation may be interpreted as something other than six literal days, the literal inerrantist has a cow.
The position held by these fundies appears to be that the Bible says whatever they want it to say and everyone who disagrees will be roasting in hell. The justification is that they are better than anyone else at interpreting the Bible because they have God-like powers of perception while others are mere fallible mortals.
No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others.
And you wonder why I may get a bit upset with such a position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 2:12 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 11:09 PM anglagard has replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5619 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 93 of 303 (374986)
01-06-2007 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by arachnophilia
01-06-2007 1:54 PM


Re: dates
see, isaiah delivers a prophecy to king ahaz, that he will defeat the assyrians. concrete terms. isaiah says to ahaz, "ask of god a sign of your choosing." when ahaz objects, isaiah gives him one.
Ahaz refused to ask for a sign of the Lord thy God so the sign of the Lord God was given by the Lord to the House of David. The sign in reference to the Lord thy God was that Immanuel would be born of a virgin. This is about the virgin birth of Christ as was prophesied by Isaiah by the Lord to the House of David.
kjv Isaiah 7:11 Ask thee a sign of the Lord thy God: ask in either the depth, or the height above.
Edited by Charley, : No reason given.
Edited by Charley, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by arachnophilia, posted 01-06-2007 1:54 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by arachnophilia, posted 01-07-2007 1:50 AM johnfolton has replied
 Message 114 by Brian, posted 01-07-2007 6:15 AM johnfolton has not replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5900 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 94 of 303 (374990)
01-06-2007 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by sidelined
01-03-2007 7:56 PM


Specificity? Good Luck
Side,
For once in your miserable doom saying lives put forth a prediction with some meat on it will you? Time and date to within a day, location and specifics sufficient to show that the event is spot on with the prediction.
Here's MY prediction: you will never see a prophecy of the type
quote:
And it shall come to pass on the seventh day of the seventh year of the second millenium that from out of the depths of the waters shall arise an SS-N-19 Granit carrying the sun. The beast from whence it comes shall be an Antey known as Voronezh, and the sun shall descend upon the House of the Great Satan which is White. And there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by sidelined, posted 01-03-2007 7:56 PM sidelined has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 95 of 303 (374998)
01-06-2007 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 2:12 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
quote:
Nowhere in the Bible, that I'm aware of, does it predict the television. However, the book of Revelation makes allusions towards it when it says that the Two Witnesses will be seen by every nation. Well, how can every nation be in the same place simultaneously?
Well now we see why you dobn't see the problems. You don't pay much attention to what the Bible says either.
quote:
"Their bodies will lie in the street of the great city, which is figuratively called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified. For three and a half days men from every people, tribe, language and nation will gaze on their bodies and refuse them burial." -Revelation 11
ISee ? it DOESN'T say that "every nation" will watch it. It says that people FROM every nation will see it. It says that these smae people will refuse them burial - how will people watching a television thousands of miles away be in a position to have any say in their burial ? It doesn't need televsion, just a cosmopolitan city with a wide variety of foreign visitors.
It's not the unbelievers who are having problems with the Bible - it is the self-styled beleivers who seem unable or unwilling to actually pay attention to what the Bible says.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 2:12 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by jar, posted 01-06-2007 6:07 PM PaulK has not replied
 Message 103 by Buzsaw, posted 01-07-2007 12:45 AM PaulK has replied
 Message 107 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-07-2007 2:21 AM PaulK has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 96 of 303 (374999)
01-06-2007 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by PaulK
01-06-2007 5:58 PM


predicting the video game generation
It says that these smae people will refuse them burial - how will people watching a television thousands of miles away be in a position to have any say in their burial ?
Ah, but that is just because you don't understand how exact the prophecy really is.
This will all be carried on Spike TV between RAW and reruns of American Idol and the viewers will text message their vote, bury or not bury.
(they will also likely text message their votes for the reruns of American Idol since they will not realize that just as with the Revelations of John, what they are viewing happened in the past and is long over)

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by PaulK, posted 01-06-2007 5:58 PM PaulK has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 303 (375013)
01-06-2007 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by arachnophilia
01-06-2007 2:19 PM


Re: the gift
i bet that in any given month, a gemini somewhere in the world meets the love of their life. and the completely different prediction is also true, though maybe for a different gemini.
But that isn't a prediction, that's a game of odds which anyone is capable of doing. I predict that Aries will meet the love of their life in September. Did I make a prediction or am I just playing odds? And you also have to take into consideration how many times have those horoscopes failed.
read the posts on the book of nahum again.
I haven't read any thread concerning Nahum the first time.
buz is taking one little tiny reference in a chapter that is about the destruction of nineveh and applying it to something entirely different. that's quote-mining, when the context contradicts the use of the smaller quote.
I will read it and give you my opinion on the application, not that I'm the authority on the matter, but I'll tell you straight up how I feel about it.
zechariah predicts that the messiah will ride into jerusalem on a donkey, through the east gate. jesus rides into jerusalem on a donkey, through the east gate. therefor jesus=messiah, right? matthew would have us believe that this is the qualifier, that riding in on a donkey makes one the messiah.
but if you think about, "riding a donkey" is rather meaningless. donkeys are quite commonly owned by lots of peasant, hundreds of thousands of which would enter jerusalem every year for passover.
Here's some homework for you. When Jesus rides in on the donkey, what do the people say and do? Is it Matthew drawing inferences that don't exist, the people, or was the prophecy legitimately fulfilled?
what matthew has done is stripped the context of the verse. the very next verse in zechariah (where matthew quotes the prophecy) gives us the effective definition of the messiah:
quote:
And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off, and he shall speak peace unto the nations; and his dominion shall be from sea to sea, and from the River to the ends of the earth.
and so on. it goes on to describe how the people of judah, led by the messiah and the lord himself, will conquer their enemies, and rule the world. the messiah will bring peace, because no one would have any hope fighting against him. clearly, this is not what happened with jesus, is it? he did not militarily conquer the planet, and force peace on everyone.
Heh. Not yet. This is the most common reason why the majority of Jews don't believe that Jesus has fulfilled the Messianic criteria. You and I have already gone over this in great detail. You are not understanding the difference and similarity between Mashiach ben Yosef and Mashiac ben David. It has always been assumed that they are two different people, as you will read in the article provided. But I propose that they are the same person coming at two different times-- namely, Yeshua.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by arachnophilia, posted 01-06-2007 2:19 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by arachnophilia, posted 01-07-2007 3:02 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 98 of 303 (375023)
01-06-2007 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by arachnophilia
01-06-2007 2:28 PM


Re: false prophecy
if a prophecy is given (quite clearly) and one misrepresents it so as to make it mean something else, how is this not a false prophecy?
If a person knowingly espouses a false doctrine, there is little doubt that its sin. Do you think that Buz is intentionally misleading people or that he believes in his interpretations?
but it's ok if they don't know that they are full of bs? what if they are willfully ignorant that they are full of bs?
What if its you that's unaware that you're full of bs? Does the context change? Are you a false prophet if you misinterpret prophecy?
and clearly, a lot christian leaders covet power.
Yes, clearly there is. And they are going to have to answer to God for that.
when one position is contradicted by simply reading the text itself, which position is right?
The right answer is the right answer, because truth is truth.
quote:
the Bible does not mention television outright, only possible allusions of it.
i don't see it. it doesn't say everyone, just people from everywhere. if you or i used that colloquially, no one would think we meant "everyone on the planet" just a "large and diverse group of people." at best, representatives. couldn't this verse be predicting the UN?
UN members from every nation, every tribe, and every language is going to be present in Jerusalem on the same street corner as the slain Witnesses' is one theory. That seems far more implausible than everyone will be able to view their deaths on television. But then again, believing that its going to be aired on television or seen by members of the UN, or whatever other theory is just that-- theoretical. I seriously doubt that God is going to send anyone to eternal damnation if one or both of us doesn't fully understand a cryptic passage.
The central message of the passage seems to me that two witnesses are called by God to preach the Word. There are all sorts of theories about these two people, not just this one part of the passage that we are currently tunnel-visioned with.
Who are they? Some think its Enoch and Elijah. Why? Because it is said that all men are called to die the first death. Both of them are reputed as being raptured. Another theory is that it is Elijah and Moses, because that's who accompanied Jesus during His transfiguration. Does it really matter who it is? It seems to me the importance is that they are from God, speaking on behalf of God, and will die preaching for God. That seems to be the focus.
Television, the UN, who they are exactly, etc, are just theories because the truth is, we only have so much to go by. Personally, I think it sounds reasonable that it is possibly speaking about television or maybe even some other technology that we currently have yet to discover. But that's just an inference. I doubt highly that my salvation hinges upon it.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by arachnophilia, posted 01-06-2007 2:28 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by arachnophilia, posted 01-07-2007 2:47 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 99 of 303 (375042)
01-06-2007 11:05 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by arachnophilia
01-06-2007 2:19 PM


Re: the gift
Arach writes:
buz is taking one little tiny reference in a chapter that is about the destruction of nineveh and applying it to something entirely different. that's quote-mining, when the context contradicts the use of the smaller quote.
My apologies to all for my lack of participation since my last post. I was very busy Friday and out of town all day today at church this AM and with relatives the rest of the day. (Sabbath/7th)
As NJ has correctly stated, I have never claimed to have the gift of prophecy. I have addressed the prophecies of Biblical prophets who had the gift of prophecy proven by the fact that the fulfilled prophecies applicable to times prior to the present were fulfilled as prophesied, such as the re-emergence of the nation of Israel with the return of the Jews, still identifiable as Jews after 19+ centuries of world dispersion and sometimes severe persecution, imo a super empirical miracle.
Arach writes:
now compare and contrast buz's vague and out-of-context use of prophecy with horoscopes. .........
read the posts on the book of nahum again. buz is taking one little tiny reference in a chapter that is about the destruction of nineveh and applying it to something entirely different. that's quote-mining, when the context contradicts the use of the smaller quote.
Though I hoped not to get stonewalled on one of the less significant prophecies, I guess since some folks seem to have a reading comprehension problem we'll need to delve into some specifics of the prophecy. I thought I had made it clear that prophesied events obviously pertaining to end time events prophesied in the book of Revelation, et al preceeded the prophecy in question of speedy wheeled vehicles speeding (as observed in horse and chariot days) and crashing in the streets.
Hebrew/chariot writes:
Merkava seriesMerkava means "Chariot" in Hebrew - not necessarily a "battle chariot" even, the word comes from the root Resh-Kaf-Bet, meaning "vehicle". ...
http://www.waronline.org/en/IDF/arms/merkava.htm - 25k -
Granted, verse one states that the ultimate primary focus of the prophecy is on Nineveh. However, as I've stated before, if one studiously seeks to master the prophetic books of the Bible, one discovers that one must be cognisant of the fact that segues of prophecy pertaining to the end time often accompany prophecies applicable to more contemporaneous fulfillment. Space does not permit it for this thread but I could site numerous incidences of this.
Analysis of high points of Nahum 1.
1. Book title: Burden of Ninevah
NOTE: Narry the hint of anything aluding to Nineveh until chapter 2 verse 8.
2. Topic one: The Biblical god, Jehovah. (ASV) Jehovah avenges and is full of wrath, taking vengence on his adversaries, reserving wrath for his enemies in verse 2.
Jehovah has his way in the whirlwind (tornadoes, hurricanes) and in the storm and the clouds are the "dust of his feet." verse 3
Jehovah rebukes the sea by making it dry, dries up all the rivers, Bashan, Carmel and the "flower of Lebanon" languish. verse 4
The mountains quake at him (Jehovah), the hills melt (leveling effect), the earth is upheaved (earthquakes), "the world and all that dwell therein." (verse 5) NOTE: SEE REVELATION 16:18-20
Rev 16:18020 writes:
18and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunders; and there was a great earthquake, such as was not since there were men upon the earth, so great an earthquake, so mighty. 19And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and Babylon the great was remembered in the sight of God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath. 20And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.
Day of Jehovah's indignation (end time wrath of God as per other prophets, Jesus and Revelation. "who can stand before his indignation? and who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? his anger is poured out like fire and the rocks are broken asunder by him." verse 6 (still in chapter one of Nahum)
Jehovah is a stronghold in the day of trouble and cognisant of those who take refuge in him. verse 7
The rest of chapter one appears to be directed to Judah as noted in verse 15, assuring them that their persecutors are cut off. (This is what happens at Armageddon when the armies of the nations who invade Israel are destroyed as per messianic prophecies and the future events, an example of which is in Ezekiel chapters 36 through 39 regarding what appears to be culminating with Armageddon, i.e the last war (invasion of Jerusalem by nations culminating with the 2nd (messianic) advent of Jesus/lord/messiah.
CHAPTER 2 CONTINUES WITH REFERENCE TO Jacob/Israel: Nahum prophesies that Jehovah will "restore" Israel after their enemies are all eliminated.
verses 3 amd 4 describe these vehicles (chariots) which "flash with STEEL in the day of his preparation." They "rage in the streets; the RUSH TO AND FRO IN THE BROADWAYS. They look like torches (likely night vision of modern broadways/freeways). They "run like lightnings" speed unimaginable by ancient horsemen and footmen.
Nobels et al addressed in next three verses. Then note the wording in verse 8, the first verse of the book of Nahum which actually addresses the city of Nineveh:
"BUT NINEVEH has been of old like a pool........" Nahum 2:8
After prophesying concerning the latter day wrath time of Jehovah, the prophet now reverts back contemporaneously to prophesy the destruction of Nineveh, including the destruction of their own ancient armies and chariots. I know there's a controversy as to the dating of the book and this thread is not for debating that. I believe Usher dates it around 713 BC but I am unable to verify that.
Suffice to say, if one; anyone who cares to keep what is written in perspective looks at the evidence which I have documented, the description of the speedy steel chariots having torches/lights in question are not contemporaneous to the time of Nahum.
I've spent over an hour on this one message in order to respond to the folks who are falsely alleging that I am addressing the prophecies in a reckless and careless manner.
EDITED FOR CORRECTION OF QUOTE WHICH I INTENDED TO ADDRESS AT BEGINNING OF THIS MESSAGE
Edited by Buzsaw, : To replace wrong Arach quote

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by arachnophilia, posted 01-06-2007 2:19 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by arachnophilia, posted 01-07-2007 2:32 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 118 by PaulK, posted 01-07-2007 7:51 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 100 of 303 (375044)
01-06-2007 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by anglagard
01-06-2007 3:25 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
The reason I ask is that this prophecy business clearly shows that literal inerrantists are claiming they can use the Bible to mean television, when it does not clearly say television.
Buz never said that it meant television, only that he believes it makes allusions towards it. I happen to agree. That doesn't mean that we're right or wrong. Maybe we'll all get to find out for certain real soon.
Yet when someone says the six days of creation may be interpreted as something other than six literal days, the literal inerrantist has a cow.
They believe in the six day creation because its a lot more clear than the Revelation prophecy that might be making inferences that its speaking about television.
The position held by these fundies appears to be that the Bible says whatever they want it to say and everyone who disagrees will be roasting in hell.
Or that's what you want to believe because its easier to hate someone who treats you poorly than someone who genuinely cares about your disposition. Here's a hint though: You won't go to hell if you don't think that extremely cryptic passage is talking about television. You'll "roast" in hell if you deny your own sins and refuse to accept the only acceptable propitiation for them.
The justification is that they are better than anyone else at interpreting the Bible because they have God-like powers of perception while others are mere fallible mortals.
Again, this sounds like your only misunderstanding which doesn't constitute a failure on either my part or Buzsaw's. I don't have God-like powers of perception, nor am I infallible, nor am I inherently immortal. Even supposing I was, God still gets all the glory, Amen.
No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others.
Name me one that feels its ok to lie, cheat or steal, etc. Not one of them. Even the worst of them don't believe that. However, many of them do live a duplicitous life, including myself at times. But none of them exonerate that behavior which is why they attempt to do it clandestinely. Why? Because they know its wrong.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by anglagard, posted 01-06-2007 3:25 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Buzsaw, posted 01-06-2007 11:53 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 102 by sidelined, posted 01-07-2007 12:18 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 104 by anglagard, posted 01-07-2007 1:11 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 113 by arachnophilia, posted 01-07-2007 3:30 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 101 of 303 (375052)
01-06-2007 11:53 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 11:09 PM


Re: THANK YOU, NJ!!
My dear brother, Biblical creationists are blessed (abe: to) have the luxury of someone as willing as you are to take the heat in such a kindly, evenhanded and articulative manner in order to balance the ideological debates at EvC. It's usually one versus a host of counterparts as you have experienced. You're equal to a half dozen of them for our team. The word angel = Greek/Angelos = messenger. You, dear brother, imo, are a messenger whom God has sent to EvC town.
Thank you so very much for your laborious contribution to EvC and may God's richest blessings be on you and yours!
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 11:09 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-07-2007 2:28 AM Buzsaw has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5936 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 102 of 303 (375055)
01-07-2007 12:18 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 11:09 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
nemesis_juggernaut
Buz never said that it meant television, only that he believes it makes allusions towards it. I happen to agree. That doesn't mean that we're right or wrong.
So it really isn't really a prophecy then, it is just a guess, is that what we are hearing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 11:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 303 (375057)
01-07-2007 12:45 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by PaulK
01-06-2007 5:58 PM


Re: Viewing Of The Bodies
PaulK writes:
ISee ? it DOESN'T say that "every nation" will watch it. It says that people FROM every nation will see it. It says that these smae people will refuse them burial - how will people watching a television thousands of miles away be in a position to have any say in their burial ? It doesn't need televsion, just a cosmopolitan city with a wide variety of foreign visitors.
NJ didn't say every nation will view the bodies. He said all nations can view the bodies - big difference.
The context states that these men will be so hated of the nations that people of the whole world will be celebrating the deaths of them. After all, these prophets had the power to cause it not to rain at will for three and a half years as well as other stuff. Judging from the extent of the celebration, the implication is horrendous global drout/global warming/famine, et al as other prophets have implicated to come on the world.
This is one heckofa biggie event. It would be very likely that the TV viewing world will view the bodies and UN representatives of the nations would demand no burial in order to please their constituents of the nations whom they represent. God also has a stake in this. He sees to it that the nations also view the resurrection of these two so as to put the fear and awe of himself into the rebellous creatures of the planet whom he has created in his own image.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by PaulK, posted 01-06-2007 5:58 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by PaulK, posted 01-07-2007 7:32 AM Buzsaw has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 104 of 303 (375061)
01-07-2007 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 11:09 PM


Ten Well Known Examples
No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others.
Name me one that feels its ok to lie, cheat or steal, etc. Not one of them. Even the worst of them don't believe that.
Here is a list of 10 to start with:
Ron Wyatt - unrepentant liar (to be fair, some have argued he may have been insane and therefore didn't know he was lying)
Ted Haggard - repentant liar
Jim Bakker - repentant liar, tax cheat, and thief
Jimmy Swaggart - repentant liar
Kent Hovind - unrepentant liar, tax cheat, and thief
Oral Roberts - unrepentant liar
Sun Myong Moon - unrepantant liar, tax cheat, thief, and blasphemer
David Koresh - unrepentant liar, blasphemer, and proxy killer
Pat Robertson - unrepentant liar
Benny Hinn - unrepentant liar
I limited blasphemy to those who have claimed they are Jesus.
{ABE} I also limited tax cheat/thief to those actually convicted in court.
There's more if this list is insufficient.
Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 11:09 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by iceage, posted 01-07-2007 1:53 AM anglagard has not replied
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 01-07-2007 10:58 AM anglagard has replied
 Message 133 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-07-2007 11:19 PM anglagard has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1372 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 105 of 303 (375063)
01-07-2007 1:50 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by johnfolton
01-06-2007 4:45 PM


Re: dates
Ahaz refused to ask for a sign of the Lord thy God so the sign of the Lord God was given by the Lord to the House of David. The sign in reference to the Lord thy God was that Immanuel would be born of a virgin. This is about the virgin birth of Christ as was prophesied by Isaiah by the Lord to the House of David.
hi.
first, please read what i wrote. then please read isaiah 7.
please notice that in almost every modern translation the word "virgin" is not present. that's because the word in the hebrew, does not mean virgin. second, please note the use of the heh-prefix on the word. which young woman? the young woman, that is to say, this specific young woman. she would have had to have been in the room for the grammar to make any sense. further, please note that the first verb of the statement seems to be present tense, not the popular future tense. the sentance should read "the young woman is pregnant."
third, please also note that this is not the prophecy, rather the time span for the prophecy. a woman at some indeterminant point in the future isn't especially useful as a marker of time, and would essentially be meaningless to king ahaz. the prophecy itself is that ahaz will defeat the asyrians. this is the prophecy:
quote:
the land whose two kings thou hast a horror of shall be forsaken.
it can be found in verse 16, as well the preceeding verses, and proceeding verses. the child has little to do with it, excpet as a marker of time. the rest of the chapter has to do with the defeat of assyria. fourth, christ's name was joshua, not imanuel.
this is a prime example of the principle i was talking about. the prophecy itself is rather concrete. it is from the lord god, through isaiah, and delivered specifically to king ahaz. it says exactly what will happen, albeit in poetic terms: assyria will be held off, and ultimately crushed. it gives a specific time frame: no more than 13 years (probably a lot less, but information about cultural customs is lacking). so let's review: ahaz will defeat the assyrian invaders within 13 years. nice, solid prophecy.
how do you get christ, who was not named immanuel, born some 600 years later, and virgin birth from this passage? it's just not what it's about. in order to do so, you have to:
  • not know hebrew,
  • not understand grammar
  • not have read the rest of the chapter
  • mistranslate a word
  • rip the verse out of context
  • change the point of the verse
  • and exploit vagueries created by your ignorance of the first two conditions.
the passage is not vague at all. you choose to make it vague in order to misrepresent it, and exploit its supposed vagueries.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by johnfolton, posted 01-06-2007 4:45 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by johnfolton, posted 01-07-2007 11:51 AM arachnophilia has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024