Did the sky really go dark as biblical inerrantists insist?

i believe that this was an isolated event that it only occured in the area Chrsit was crucified.when they also say that an earthquake happened does that mean the entire earth shook? no, just that place.the sun was darkened yeah, when clouds come over the sun it gets dark then too.

i know that the romans were good record-keepers, but think about it, why was evidence for Jesus so scarce? do you think they were ashamed of the whole act that they limited the information? i see corruption ALL across the globe today, you believe it not then too?getting DARK and an OVERCAST could mean the same thing, it also depends on the writers education on writing, or even the language it was written in. who are you getting these verses from? one of the gospels right? well, who were the gospels? some great educator from a great school? no regular ppl maybe some who werent even educated. ME who goes to college didnt even know to use overcasted as the sun went dark lol

yes but thats when they found cause in the people, they didnt find cause in Jesus, maybe they were ashamed of that you cant rephrase an earthquake.....the ground was shaking? that still means an earthquake happened. and the curtain getting torn you cant rephrase that either! it got torn. and you are also not putting into consideration that maybe just maybe those other writers were different than that one? that they write differently but means the same thing?

thats an overstatement you assume that writers back then could understand that? putting into consideration the education of that writer passes right over you? i admit there was no proof of that, at least to MY knowledge i havent LOOKED for the answers. but i DO admit that there is no proof of that, that is the reason why i said "maybe". but then again a lot of the miracles Jesus did wasnt in Rome, it was out of Rome, so what are the romans to document? and when the pharisees went over to Rome to whine about Jesus they didnt tell them hes bringing peopel alive!!! all they said was "this man is accusing our belief saying he is the messiah" etc.even the pharisees wish to ignore what miracles Jesus did! you think if they ignored it it would reach Rome's ears happily? no, even when Jesus wasnt even close to Rome when he did miracles. ah well you cant because i dont know much about that, may you please be kind to point out the verse where it says such things? (minus the sarcasm)

we do that, but you have to research those authors too! then we can build an understanding of what REALLY happened my bad =D appeared unto MANY, meaning not everyone saw them...so tell me, if you see a ghost today or a dead person walking, and you went up to the police to say "i saw my grandpa get out of his grave and walk to me!" you think they are going to believe you?the romans could have marked this as hysteria people were acting out insanities, and/or were grieving over Jesus' death and saw things due to their depression.....they could say THAT and never even record it, cuz i mean its like recording a bee pollinating a flower LOL its rediculous to record

ive noticed that both Mark and Luke dont have the earth shaking involved in their text. BUT they both have that centaurion talkin in their texts instead, maybe they didnt write the earth shaking becuase they wished to involve the centaurion in its place?i also notice that John doesnt mention NEITHER action, nor do ANY of the other books mention the piercing of Jesus' flesh, which proved prophesy