Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Geological question. (Sea floor sediment accumulation)
jar
Member (Idle past 384 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 38 (399419)
05-05-2007 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by CanadianBiologyGeek
05-05-2007 3:36 AM


Biblical Creation Scientists just plain lie!
The question they raise is that there is not enough mud on the sea floor. It is a classic example of how the leadership in Biblical Christianity and Biblical Creationism con the gullible public, of the dishonesty of Biblical Christian Leadership.
First off, they make the assumption that "seas" are those we are familar with today.
That is of course, patently false, demonstrably false, and frankly, the "Creation Scientists" know that and just lie to the public.
We can identify many ancient oceans. For example, the summit of Mount Everest, the lowest exposed layers of the Grand Canyon, all of central North America, the Sahara Desert, the Gobi Desert, and quite frankly, a significant part of all the land we live on are the very sediments that they say are missing.
Subduction is a force that removes evidence. Those areas that do get subducted are then melted and eventually return to the surface as magma.
Biblical Creation Scientists simply lie.
There is no other way to explain it.
The missing mud is everywhere.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by CanadianBiologyGeek, posted 05-05-2007 3:36 AM CanadianBiologyGeek has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 384 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 19 of 38 (400269)
05-11-2007 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Buzsaw
05-11-2007 8:30 PM


Re: About That Refute
Logically it seems the catastropic Global flood suddenly cut the Grand Canyon somewhat like the Mt St Helens canyon and there wasn't a similar sudden break through condition to cut the other rivers so they didn't get cut deep.
Well no, logically that is simply bullshit. Only someone totally ignorant of the facts would think such a thing. There is NO evidence there ever was a "catastropic Global flood" and there is absolute evidence that the Grand Canyon formed over time long periods of time.
See Message 1 for absolute refutation of the lie that the Grand Canyon formed quickly.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Buzsaw, posted 05-11-2007 8:30 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 384 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 34 of 38 (400440)
05-13-2007 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by bdfoster
05-13-2007 8:03 PM


Glad you are here so let's put you to work
Really glad you dropped in cause we need your help. We have a thread where we are very slowly trying to explore the Grand canyon from the bottom up explaining each layer before moving to the next one.
Right now we are still in the basement, but I'd love for us to keep moving on. You can find it at Message 1.
We've made it to the Dox Formation. Can you help us climb to the next layer?
Edited by jar, : No reason given.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by bdfoster, posted 05-13-2007 8:03 PM bdfoster has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by bdfoster, posted 05-13-2007 9:15 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024