The Definition for the Theory of Evolution

Ah - so what you are saying is that you weren't addressing what I was talking about then?

I don't see how my definition can prevent or inhibit a creationist lying or obfuscating.

You are unread and completely ignorant.

Johnson is a recognized scholar.

A change in gene frequencies is the geneticist definition of evolution. It is not the only valid definition of evolution.

Evolution is inferred; it cannot be observed in real time because it is too slow. What happens in the molecular universe is not falsifiable as one must take the word of the scientist on it, whether an Evolutionist or Creationist.Evolution is not observable. This makes it much like Creationism: we do not get to see exactly when God creates by special creation. Like evolution, special creation is inferred after the fact.

Now that I know you are unread and ignorant I will not be reading anymore of your messages.

This is the common frequency of alleles definition, heavy on genetics, light on natural selection, and mute on speciation (or even the question of what a species is).

It is not a matter of opinion:

I don't see reason why Theory of Evolution (ToE) is reffered as the modern synthesis.

yeah, i understood the yarns that spun my brain around unneccesarily. hypothesis on assumptions on hypothesis dabbed with some theory and even some facts to top it off.The fact is the conclusions might be considered science by the extreme religious zealots in the fundamentals of HOE, however the initial guesswork assumptions are not. Or maybe its vice versa. whatever.

So before he has even fully communicated his position, you already know that it is wrong?

In layman's terms, common descent is shit.It's a religion, and should be left out of the definition of evolution.

By the way, the foundations of biology are philsophical.

So, even if he does bring the stone down and it crushes you (when you could have cast yourself upon it and willingly been broken); you will be oblivious, because you are not thinking at his level.You will simply be tormented forever by your lack of understanding and demise. It will never make sense to you, because you will not let it make sense. It would cost you your most treasured posession; your sin.

I almost forget how good HOE's (hypothesis of evolutioners) are at assuming things. That kind of faith could be put to good use. ;pWhy is it always the opposition that doesn't understand? If I really wanted to immerse myself in scientific literature I'd watch certain porn. Because nothing screams ridiculous like midgets and absurd obesity.Anywise, I used my superior techniques of speed reading (of which you are completely ignorant and stupefied) to skim the all of the articles. I had read them a few times prior to enlisting to EvC so I am aware of "evidences" for macro evolution. Which I think is a bunch of fairy tales and that's how I would paraphrase it to someone who hadn't read it.Here's a good creationist argument, your stupid. Oh wait,... that's already taken by you.
AND FOR THE LAST TIME READ THE RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE ARE WAY OFF TOPIC!!! MOLBIOCHIK! WE NEED HELP!

Exactly what I said in the other thread...

Do you have any idea of the physics involved in sex magic?
You clearly are ignorant of science.

ME: 4.3 billion You: 0