Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 210 (7535 total )
Current session began: Page Loaded: 05-25-2013 11:09 PM
103 online now:
Chatting now:
Chat room empty
Newest Member: andygee
Post Volume:
Total: 698,972
Year: 13,419 /40,304
Month: 1,979 /2,861
Week: 411 /443
Day: 67 /43
Hour: 0 /2
Originator Info
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3114
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0
Originated: 07-10-2007 5:36 AM
Total Participants: 10
Total Posts: 17 Summation Mode: Off
Author
Topic: Draft of anti-ID letter to the editor
PaulK Member
Posts: 10084
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 9.0
Re: The letter I'm replying to
Having read this letter I think you should make the point that there isn't a genuine scientific controversy.Ths entry at Pure Pedantry looks like it could be useful even though it mainly deals with global warming.
You could also refer to the Wedge Document
From the first sentence there's plenty of ammunition
The proposition that human beings are created in the image of God is one of the bedrock principles on which Western civilization was built
Most notably the "Strategic Plan":
Phase I is the essential component of everything that comes afterward. Without solid scholarship, research and argument, the project would be just another attempt to indoctrinate instead of persuade
As can clearly be seen Phase I failed, there is no soild scholarship, research and argument supporting ID - yet the ID movement moved on to phases II and III anyway. It seems that ID is "just another attempt to indoctrinate".
This message is a reply to: Message 11 by Minnemooseus , posted 07-10-2007 8:59 PM Minnemooseus has not yet responded
Minnemooseus Member
Posts: 3114
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0
Message 17 of 17 (414951)
08-07-2007 5:22 AM
Any letter is in stalled mode
Maybe someday I'll send something in. I don't follow that newspaper real closely, so I don't know if anyone else has replied.I have just encountered an interesting article, via The Panda's Thumb . It is Discovery Institute tries to "swift-boat" Judge Jones at ncseweb.org.
One thing I now note, is that Mr. Erickson sure seems to imply that he is coming from a YEC perspective (see his letter in message 11). Certainly he's some sort of admitted creationist.
Moose
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to: Board Administration
The Public Record
Announcements
Proposed New Topics
Suggestions and Questions
Science Forums
The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy
Big Bang and Cosmology
Dates and Dating
Education and Creation/Evolution
Biological Evolution
Geology and the Great Flood
Human Origins and Evolution
Intelligent Design
Is It Science?
Creation/Evolution Miscellany
Origin of Life
Social and Religious Issues
Bible Study
Comparative Religions
Social Issues and Creation/Evolution
Faith and Belief
Theological Creationism and ID
Side Orders
Coffee House
The Great Debate
Free For All
Post of the Month
Links and Information
Creation/Evolution In The News
The Book Nook
Columnist
Practice Makes Perfect
Archives
Topic Proposals Archive
Showcase
Retired Forums
Short Subjects (No new topics or messages)
Unregistered friends of Buzsaw
Copyright 2001-2013 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.0 Beta Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2013