ERV's: Evidence of Common Ancestory

refpunk writes:So how does that prove that animals bred humans descendants?

refpunk writes:All your post shows is what could have happened before there were any witnesses.

Refpunk writes:That's called science fiction, not science.

The O.P. writes:In fact, there are seven ERVs between humans and chimps...

I saw a show on the Discovery Science Channel where one guy was playing with a baloon filled with salt and watched how that salt settled, then claimed, "that's how the world was formed!"

1) That apes turned into humans

4) That if there's life on Mars, that means there were Martians (as some "scientists" now claim.So again,since that's how science fiction writers come up with their plots, then that's called science fiction, not science.

LOL. Again, claiming there were glaciers is as much science fiction as claiming that the world was once covered with lava. It's all speculation that comes from looking at a piece of ground, then claiming that the whole ground was once that way.
In fact, that's how scientists make up reality. That's how they speculate how the world was formed and anything else that happened before there were any witnesses. I saw a show on the Discovery Science Channel where one guy was playing with a baloon filled with salt and watched how that salt settled, then claimed, "that's how the world was formed!"And that's how scientists (it's importnant that they call themselves scientists so people will listen to them)have formulated:1) That apes turned into humans
2) How the world was formed
3) That the world was covered in ice
4) That if there's life on Mars, that means there were Martians (as some "scientists" now claim.So again,since that's how science fiction writers come up with their plots, then that's called science fiction, not science.

LOL. Again, claiming there were glaciers is as much science fiction as claiming that the world was once covered with lava.

I saw a show on the Discovery Science Channel where one guy was playing with a baloon filled with salt and watched how that salt settled, then claimed, "that's how the world was formed!"

And since an ape has never been witnessed giving birth to a human

That's no more evidence of common descent than looking at a woman who looks like my aunt then claiming that she's a close relative of my aunt. That's making imaginary connections where none exist.Evidence is OBERSVABLE PHENOMENA, not imaginary connections. And since an ape has never been witnessed giving birth to a human or anything resembling a human since man has walked the earth, then evolution is not observable phenomena, only imaginary connections.

That's no more evidence of common descent than looking at a woman who looks like my aunt then claiming that she's a close relative of my aunt. That's making imaginary connections where none exist.

Evidence is OBERSVABLE PHENOMENA, not imaginary connections.

And since it's never been observed that an animal's DNA has ever been inserted into a human ...

The first publicized case of animal-human hybrids took place in 1996 when Jose Cibelli, a scientist at the University of Massachusetts, took DNA from his white blood cells by swabbing the inside of his cheek. He then inserted the DNA sample into a hollowed-out cow egg.

If such an embryo (were allowed) develop, he said, the result would resemble a human being but carry bovine mitochondria, the energy-producing component of every cell.

Last October (2001), Greenpeace Germany dug up a patent claim for a similar human-animal hybrid, only this time it involved a pig. U.S.-based Biotransplant and Australia-based Stem Cell Sciences grew a pig-human embryo to 32 cells before ending its life.

"If the embryo had lived, it would be 95% human."

... a flock of about 50 smelly sheep, many of them possessing partially human livers, hearts, brains and other organs...(The researcher couldn't) wait to examine the effects of the human cells he had injected into the fetus’ brain about two months ago.

In the past two years, scientists have created pigs with human blood, fused rabbit eggs with human DNA and injected human stem cells to make paralyzed mice walk.

Sorry, but since the OP's scenario doesn't happen in real life ...

Forensics deals in observable phenomena, not imaginary scenarios.

And since it's never been observed that an animal's DNA has ever been inserted into a human and produced a half-man, half beast, then evolution is a fairy tale ....

which is why it's still only called a theory.

Refpunk writes:Forensics deals in observable phenomena

Referenced Link writes: One way to distinguish between copying and independent creation is suggested by analogy to the following two cases from the legal literature. In 1941 the author of a chemistry textbook brought suit charging that portions of his textbook had been plagiarized by the author of a competing textbook ... In 1946 the publisher of a trade directory for the construction industry made similar charges against a competing directory publisher... In both cases, mere similarity between the contents of the alleged copies and the originals was not considered compelling evidence of copying. After all, both chemistry textbooks were describing the same body of chemical knowledge (the books were designed to "function similarly") and both directories listed members of the same industry, so substantial resemblance would be expected even if no copying had occurred. However, in both cases errors present in the "originals" appeared in the alleged copies. The courts judged that it was inconceivable that the same errors could have been made independently by each plaintiff and defendant, and ruled in both cases that copying had occurred. The principle that duplicated errors imply copying is now well established in copyright law. (In recognition of this fact, directory publishers routinely include false entries in their directories to trap potential plagiarizers.)Can "errors" in modern species be used as evidence of "copying" from ancient ancestors? In fact, the answer to this question appears to be "yes," since recent molecular genetics investigations have uncovered some examples of the same "errors" present in the genetic material of humans and apes. To understand these findings it is necessary to know a little about DNA, the chemical molecule in which genetic information is stored.

Refpunk writes:And since it's never been observed that an animal's DNA has ever been inserted into a human and produced a half-man, half beast, then evolution is a fairy tale which is why it's still only called a theory.