Aliens and the Bible

Seems to me that this pretty much invalidates much of the bible. I don't really have a problem with adding a twist to a good story, but it does present some problems for believers don't you think? He reminds me of Spock, relation perhaps?**abe** What message would you predict is correct? Did they write the bible with the intent to be correctly interpreted with modern english? Why didn't they change the text back then if everyone was reading the bible and saying "God is an alien who rides flying chariots from mars"I am with Jar, it just seems to be more logical. It says what it means.
**abe**Edited by Vacate, : Hebrew scripture predicts God is greenEdited by Vacate, : Formatting

But then in a sense aren't you saying that the true message of the bible changes along with the evolution of language?I agree with you in the idea that had there been a UFO in those times they would have ascribed it to miracles. However, if you are saying that this is in fact what the bible is saying - what else is incorrect? How much of the bible is open for UFO minded interpetation? True, but it does invalidate the writers interpretation of events he does not understand.

Do you have any proof that we are near "the end", if not then how do you know that this language, at this time is conductive to a correct interpretation? (or a better understood interpretation of meaning) Better yet read about the flood with UFO's in mind!!---------------
Seeing the unfortunate results of his experiment Emperor Plptn beams up Noah and his family to a secure location in orbit near the small moon of Endor (Pronounced Moon in modern English)“As you can see, my young apprentice, your friends have failed. Now witness the firepower of this fully ARMED and OPERATIONAL battle station!”A relaxing voyage in a Virtual Reality simulator and a uneventful launch of the Genesis Torpedo and the world as we know it is devoid of flood evidence without “invalidating the other translations”----------Sounds like I am just making shit up, and I am. But are they stories that are meant to convey reality or just a method of keeping the faith? If its just a story than how can it become more true as the language evolves?Oh - Try this if you are wondering how to get the quote boxes. [qs]quote boxes are easy[/qs] and it becomes: You can also hit the "Peek" button on the bottom of peoples posts if you wonder what various codes they have used.Sorry for the theft of your code Razd!

Of course some will be subtle, its kind of a necessity to look for the subtle clues when the earth shaking ones never take place. I remember on my dads farm when one chicken always followed the dogs around. It even slept with them. I was young, so I assumed the chicken was stupid, instead you suggest it was a message? Certainly an odd case. What happened to the lioness? I mean, before one declares this a "mini miracle" I think it begs the question of the fitness of the lioness. Was this animal fit and healthy? Did it mate and produce offspring? Could it have been the lion equivalent of stupid? A prophecy was fulfilled and only one witness! Typical. Billions of people looking for answers and it comes when only one person was looking. It is also somewhat anticlimactic - The poor lamb goat kid got eaten. So what you are saying is back then such a fulfillment would make sense to someone who witnesses these mini-miracles, but a person today would see it as a simple oddity. You see, today we do make such distinctions. Are you taking this statement back? You made it in message 80 and it does not seem to apply in this case. Does it only apply to aliens and not to lions who forget to eat goats?