Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Creationist Method
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 48 of 93 (413486)
07-31-2007 3:15 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Doddy
07-30-2007 9:11 PM


Re: Maybe change your wording?
That is not quite true. For instance creationists regularly deny the existence of transitional fossils - or more than a few transitional fossils - rather than admit that there are many.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Doddy, posted 07-30-2007 9:11 PM Doddy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Doddy, posted 07-31-2007 3:47 AM PaulK has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 50 of 93 (413493)
07-31-2007 3:50 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Doddy
07-31-2007 3:47 AM


Re: Maybe change your wording?
The existence. Randman, for instance repeatedly insisted that there were only a few transitional fossils. i.e. He assumed that the commonly used examples were the only transitional fossils known.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Doddy, posted 07-31-2007 3:47 AM Doddy has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 88 of 93 (424868)
09-29-2007 3:27 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by Rob
09-29-2007 12:15 AM


Re: The ID Method
I'm familiar with the Design Inference - I even have the book.
But it's not a method that the ID movement actually uses. It's not a method that anyone seems to seriously use.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Rob, posted 09-29-2007 12:15 AM Rob has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024