So as a curious Evolution/Creation studier, i was just wandering if the science/evolutionary people have a reason for rocks at like the grand canyon or other parts that havey flat rock and perfectly laid down. It appears like it was laid down rapidly, so wouldnt that be in support of the flood when the waters receded. Also wouldnt that mean in terms of creation theory that the rocks at the bottom are actually the youngest and the rocks at the top are the oldest??
i was just wandering if the science/evolutionary people have a reason for rocks at like the grand canyon or other parts that havey flat rock and perfectly laid down. It appears like it was laid down rapidly
Why doesn't it appear that they were laid down slowly?
Mark
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
How do you propose to slip young rocks in beneath rocks that are already there? That seems a mite tricky to me.
Not for the Great Layer. He can lay down and shuffle anything He likes. When He laid down a Devonian layer He could always dig it up, turn it over, and lay it down again, under a Precambrian layer if He chose to. Anything laid down in any order by the Great Layer will be hard to explain. He laid Mary down in a Hebrew town right under Joseph’s nose. Indeed the Great Layer knows a thing or two about seducing married women who claim to be virgins. He probably laid down some pre-stratified sperm that got to Mary’s eggs just ahead of Joseph’s. Now that’s divine stratification for you!