not sure how to debate existence, which the word is like all words, they describe something.
existing isn't an idea..its an asserted fact that science has not produced an answer to.
i cant debate it in science that's based on something tentative.
I'm deeply concerned that science is given too much freedom with tentative theories in regard to what i call : the LAW of existence.
is this then debatable? or forever to be overlooked by science?
(its viable in the ID debate since existence is what religion was spawned from by the question that only man can ask: where did we come from, and how can we exist? which ironically was also the basis of scientific enquiry) -IMO
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
™ Version 4.2