Human Evolution (re: If evolved from apes, why still apes?)

Duplicate posting. - See below.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

Duplicate - See below.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

Duplicate posting - See below.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

quote:

---

I'm sure you have been given this question by some preacher or another member of the CCOI-tm by Jar ( Christian Cult of Ignorance) as a supposed killer of Darwinism.

​

If so you should reject such as individual or organization of a source for any of your ideas. They are either deliberately lying or utterly and willful ignorant.

---

After reading aroudn for a long while, I've noticed that whenver a creationist says something, the evolutionist come back and not only offers a counter-example, but slams the creationist with insulst such as "Christian Cult of Ignorance" (Christianity isn't a cult) or "utterly and willful[ly] ignorant". Then, as far as I can tell, whenever a creationist comes with a counter-example to an evolutionist, they only state the counter-example. Seriously, the evolutionists on this site aren't really representing evolutionists very well.Remember, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Or, "Do to other people what you would want them to do to you." Even though it's in the Bible, doesn't mean that it isn't good advice for everybody.

quote:

---

Fish, m'boy, please get a clue.

---

First, I think it's 'Previously Refuted A Thousand Times', not that it matters. Your way works to.Second, your refutes to this topic were seemingly against me. If you'll notice, the message you replied to never had any arguments for or against the topic, just a little encouragement and question.Third, you just made my point. By constantly calling me a 'fish' (I know fully well what Ichthus is and its acronym (I think that it's Iesous Christos (h) Theos (h) Uios Sotos, in the original greek language).Fourth, Creationism is not recycled feces. My point is thus: Every major civilization at the beginning of time (dated around 6,000 A.D. has believed not only in a God (or gods), but in a creation. There was absolutely no way that these civilizations, separated by at most seventeen thousand miles, the world's biggest (and possibly roughest) ocean, and the world's highest mountains. Therefore, the only explanation would be that all of these stories came from a real event. If you disagree, please do so and explain your theory on how these civilizations could have communicated the creation theory over this time.P.S. Just as a side-note, evolutionism only came into being in the 1800's. According to creationists, that'd be only 200 out of 6000-8000 years, or 3%-2.5% of humanity. To evolutionists, it'd be 0.00013% of humanity. Either way, creationism has been accepted far longer and even now by far more people than evolutionism. By sheer numbers, let along the truth, creationism wins.

quote:

---

his "numbers" game is fine. Lets play it with scientific evidence. When we do that creationism and other ideas, such as a global flood, come up with no scientific support while the theory of evolution comes up with mountains of supporting evidence.

---

Well, how about fossils of animals that seem to have died violent deaths, or fossils that cover two or more sedimentary layers, or layers that were considered older are above 'younger' ones. Or even that pollen spores have been found in the Grand Canyon inside of rocks that are supposedly so old life wasn't even beginning to form, let alone plants. It seems that

The animals that died violent deaths indicate a flood

The fossils that are in two layers indicate a flood (or rapid sediment deposition)

Evolution is either wrong or vastly incorrect in its timescale.

​

Is this not evidence?