Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Your prediction about outcome of Super Tuesday
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 109 (453326)
02-01-2008 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Buzsaw
02-01-2008 8:13 PM


Sadly for America "Kingdom On Earth" candidate Obama, the mysterious pseudo Islamo black radical with close ties to and loyal long time member of an Africa first church which promotes racist black supremicy in America with close ties to the Nation of Islam will likely be the next president of the US of A.
I'm really not understanding where you are getting this Islamo black radical theory, Buz. In fact, some have alleged that his unequivocal support of AIPAC is evidence that the "Zionists" have him in their pocket. Are his denunciations of radical Islamic organizations just lip service?
Unless Huckabee should pull out a trump card, I'll likely go with Romney.
Do you really want to go with someone who not only flip flops on every issue as is, but even flip flops in the span of three seconds when it comes to the Bible?
Neither of them is conservative enough to suit me. I began to lean toward Thompson, but alas.
I've always liked Fred, but yes, alas...

“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2008 8:13 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2008 9:48 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 109 (453339)
02-01-2008 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Chiroptera
02-01-2008 8:20 PM


Topic drift
My comment pertained to the candidate Obama and why I think America will go with such an ideologically radical inclined choice.
Your comment has no bearing to topic so no response.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Chiroptera, posted 02-01-2008 8:20 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 109 (453342)
02-01-2008 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Hyroglyphx
02-01-2008 8:49 PM


Hi Nem; glad you're active again. Perhaps the place to respond in debth on Obama is the Obama thread. Perhaps tomorrow I'll find some time to post some more in that relative to your questions.
Pertaining to your comment on Romney, I'd go for Hucky but am afraid that would be a vote for McCain who has a record about 180 degrees from what he's mouthing to get elected. I don't think Hucky likes Romney and will likely throw his support to McCain if he continues to remain the tipper guy who will likely tip the primary to his suiting.
There remains no bonafide conservative, including Hucky according to his record (abe: though I may end up voting for Hucky. I've never been so frustrated and undecided in my life.)
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-01-2008 8:49 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2642 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 34 of 109 (453356)
02-01-2008 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Chiroptera
02-01-2008 8:20 PM


Off topic - Content "hidden" - Start a new topic or something - Adminnemooseus
It will be interesting whether a US attack on Iran will the the "invasion of Poland" that will lead the world to finally say that enough is enough.
{Content "hidden" as being off-topic. Use "peek" if you must, but do not reply. Maybe find a better place for it? - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above. Despite that I agree about the "hidden" content.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add subtitle.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Chiroptera, posted 02-01-2008 8:20 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1344 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 35 of 109 (453486)
02-02-2008 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Buzsaw
02-01-2008 8:13 PM


more obama innuendo.
Sadly for America "Kingdom On Earth" candidate Obama, the mysterious pseudo Islamo black radical with close ties to and loyal long time member of an Africa first church which promotes racist black supremicy in America with close ties to the Nation of Islam will likely be the next president of the US of A.
more slime. you're like a hagfish or something. you just don't stop oozing the disgusting sludge, do you?
You can be reasonably sure every hyper-racist Nation of Islamist member will be pulling the lever for this professor of Christianity who openly mouths Christian rhetoric but cozies up to hyper radical black supremicy racist types who have friendly relations and close ties with the Nation of Islam.
yeah, no, he's what the radical islamic sects would call "an infidel." professing christianity after being raised a muslim = death to the infidel.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2008 8:13 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2008 4:00 PM arachnophilia has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1344 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 36 of 109 (453487)
02-02-2008 11:02 AM


i think hillary's probably taking the democratic nomination, and romney is taking the republicans.
but i'd much rather obama and mccain.


Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Quetzal, posted 02-02-2008 3:36 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5872 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 37 of 109 (453518)
02-02-2008 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by arachnophilia
02-02-2008 11:02 AM


but i'd much rather obama and mccain.
Me, too. If it came down to that choice, I might actually have the opportunity to rationally determine who would be the best candidate/president, rather than trying to choose the least worst.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by arachnophilia, posted 02-02-2008 11:02 AM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 109 (453520)
02-02-2008 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by arachnophilia
02-02-2008 11:01 AM


Re: more obama innuendo.
Arach writes:
yeah, no, he's what the radical islamic sects would call "an infidel." professing christianity after being raised a muslim = death to the infidel.
You make my point. The mystery involves just that: Where are the Islamic threats, protests, and admonitions to and about Obama from the Islamic fundi clerics; narry a peep. Why? Because they can see what you people refuse to see, that the people Obama hangs out with promote their agenda. They know that what he says is justified by Islamic law so long as his record does not confirm his political electioneer rhetoric and in the end Islam is advanced.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by arachnophilia, posted 02-02-2008 11:01 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Chiroptera, posted 02-02-2008 5:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 47 by arachnophilia, posted 02-04-2008 4:37 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 39 of 109 (453528)
02-02-2008 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Buzsaw
02-01-2008 8:13 PM


Buz, do you know who these men are?
Do you know who these people are, and, perhaps more importantly, when and where this picture was taken?
When: December 4, 1997
Who: Taliban representatives
Where: Texas
They were there to visit George W. Bush and his oil executive cronies when he was Governor of Texas.
There's also that whole thing with Bush flying members of Bin Laden's family back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11, too.
Guess if you want real evidence of who has connections to radical Islamists, we need look no further than the current Commander in Chief, do we?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2008 8:13 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2008 9:32 PM nator has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 109 (453529)
02-02-2008 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Buzsaw
02-02-2008 4:00 PM


I'm suspicious.
I'm beginning to think that Buz is a secret Obama operative who has hit upon an ingenious way to goad us all to vote for Obama.

Spare a thought for the stay-at-home voter;
His empty eyes gaze at strange beauty shows
And a parade of the gray suited grafters:
A choice of cancer or polio. -- The Rolling Stones

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2008 4:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 109 (453543)
02-02-2008 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by nator
02-02-2008 5:55 PM


Re: Buz, do you know who these men are?
You've got me there, madear. Now unless I heard it wrong, he's wanting to sell the Saudis 20 billion worth of arms all the while working fevorishly to goad Israel into forking up strategic portions of their tiny little nation to their avowed enemies.
The Republican party is sinking continually into deeper disarray and the nation is going to hell in a hand basket as the saying goes.
As it was with ancient Israel when they departed from Jehovah God's precepts they lost the blessings of Jehovah God.
We deserve no better than Obama, Ms Clinton or John McCain, the pseudo Republican.
Imo, Obama who I pick as the most likely ultimate winner is the most risky choice, as per the reasons I've stated, for America, considering all the national security he would then have authority over and access to and given the Taliban, Wahabehs & Jihadists are ever fevorishly working as moles to infiltrate all levels of American government.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by nator, posted 02-02-2008 5:55 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by nator, posted 02-03-2008 10:29 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 52 by Rrhain, posted 02-05-2008 5:15 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 61 by obvious Child, posted 02-06-2008 6:50 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 42 of 109 (453587)
02-03-2008 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Buzsaw
02-02-2008 9:32 PM


Re: Buz, do you know who these men are?
Wouldn't the candidate most like George Bush be the most risky candidate, since Bush's actions have increased the number of Islamic terrorists in the world, not decreased it, and has made us more dependent upon foreign oil, not less?
After all, it wasn't Democrats who invited the Taliban to the US and courted them for an oil pipeline deal, despite the fact we knew of their horrible opprssion of their people and their ties to terrorism.
It was the Republicans, Buz.
The neoconservative, right-wing, old-money, conservative Christian Republicans who got into bed with the Taliban. And, I might add, they got into bed with Saddam Hussein, years before.
So, why on earth would you think that a Democrat, rather than a NeoCon, right wing Republican, would be most likely to be a tool of the Taliban, when history provides you with ample evidence that it is actually the Neocon, right-wing Republican Christian that is by far the most risky candidate?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2008 9:32 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 02-03-2008 11:05 AM nator has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 109 (453592)
02-03-2008 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by nator
02-03-2008 10:29 AM


Re: Buz, do you know who these men are?
Bush hasn't increased the # of terrorists. He's just flushed them out. He didn't cause 9/11. His problem has been appeasement building up hostile Islamic nations who still seek Islamic global domination since 9/11. What he's done has all been in the open but a mole would operate under the table.
Had people like me had any idea how the Bush policy would play out we'd never have voted for him. You can't trust any polititians any more it appears.
To delve further into this leads further off topic.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by nator, posted 02-03-2008 10:29 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 02-03-2008 2:12 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 44 of 109 (453645)
02-03-2008 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Buzsaw
02-03-2008 11:05 AM


Re: Buz, do you know who these men are?
quote:
Bush hasn't increased the # of terrorists. He's just flushed them out.
No, buz.
If you invade and destroy a Islamic country with a secular government for no good reason, and occupy that country and are sluggish to rebuild its infrastructure so the people cannot get back to work and normal life, and you detain thousands for no reason and give them no legal recourse, and you torture detainees, you are bound to piss a lot of them off.
What are pissed off Muslims vulnerable to?
Islamic extremist recruiting.
Don't believe me? What about government intelligence agencies:
Read the whole article here
WASHINGTON, Sept. 23 ” A stark assessment of terrorism trends by American intelligence agencies has found that the American invasion and occupation of Iraq has helped spawn a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks.
The classified National Intelligence Estimate attributes a more direct role to the Iraq war in fueling radicalism than that presented either in recent White House documents or in a report released Wednesday by the House Intelligence Committee, according to several officials in Washington involved in preparing the assessment or who have read the final document.
The intelligence estimate, completed in April, is the first formal appraisal of global terrorism by United States intelligence agencies since the Iraq war began, and represents a consensus view of the 16 disparate spy services inside government. Titled “Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States,’’ it asserts that Islamic radicalism, rather than being in retreat, has metastasized and spread across the globe.
An opening section of the report, “Indicators of the Spread of the Global Jihadist Movement,” cites the Iraq war as a reason for the diffusion of jihad ideology.
The report “says that the Iraq war has made the overall terrorism problem worse,” said one American intelligence official.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 02-03-2008 11:05 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by arachnophilia, posted 02-04-2008 4:47 AM nator has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5521 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 45 of 109 (453709)
02-03-2008 7:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by teen4christ
01-30-2008 7:57 PM


Here's my guess.
McCain Wins.
Hillary gets enough delegates to be in a confortable position (a margin of 150 to 250 over Obama), But Obama fights on up until March 4 2008. Texas is deciding the Democrats race. You can call me nuts!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by teen4christ, posted 01-30-2008 7:57 PM teen4christ has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by fallacycop, posted 02-04-2008 10:10 AM fallacycop has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024